The new ecological paradigm revisited: anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 329-347

  Lundmark, Carina ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69349096530     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620701430448     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albrecht, D., Bultena, G., Hoiberg, E., and Nowak, P., 1982. The new environmental paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 13: 39–43.
2. Barbour, I. G., ed. 1973. Western man and environmental ethics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Barry, J., and Wissenburg, M., eds. 2001. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4. Brown, L. R., 1978. The twenty-ninth day, New York: Norton.
5. Catton, W. R., and Dunlap, R. E., 1980. A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1): 15–47.
6. nd edn), London: Routledge.
7. Continental Group. 1982. Toward responsible growth: economic and environmental concern in balance, Stamford, CT: The Continental Group.
8. Dalton, R. J., Gontmacher, Y., Lovrich, N. P., and Pierce, J. C., 1999. “ Environmental attitudes and the new environmental paradigm ”. In Critical masses: citizens, nuclear weapons production, and environmental destruction in the United States and Russia, Edited by: Dalton, R. J., Garb, P., Lovrich, N. P., Pierce, J. C., and Whitely, J. M., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Devall, B., 1993. Living richly in an age of limits: using deep ecology for an abundant life, Salt Lake City: Gibbs Smith Publishers.
10. Devall, B., and Sessions, G., 1985. Deep ecology: living as if nature mattered, Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith Books.
11. Dobson, A., 1998. Justice and the environment. Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Dobson, A., 2003. Citizenship and the environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A., 1982. Risk and culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. nd edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Dryzek, J., and Schlosberg, D., 2001. Debating the earth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Dunlap, R. E., 1975. Sociological and social-psychological perspectives on environmental issues: a bibliography, Exchange Bibliography No. 916, Monticello: Council of Planning Librarians.
17. Dunlap, R. E., and Van Liere, K. D., 1978. The ‘new environmental paradigm’: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9: 10–19.
18. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., and Jones, R. E., 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 425–442.
19. Eckersley, R., 1992. Environmentalism and political theory: towards an ecocentric approach, New York: UCL Press.
20. Eckersley, R., 1995. Liberal democracy and the rights of nature: the struggle for inclusion. Environmental Politics, 4(4): 169–198. Special issue on ecology and democracy
21. Ehrlich, P. R., and Ehrlich, A. H., 1972. Population, resources, environment: issues in human ecology, San Francisco: Freeman.
22. Fox, W., 1995. Toward a transpersonal ecology. Developing new foundations for environmentalism, New York: State University of New York Press.
23. Geller, J. M., and Lasley, P., 1985. The new environmental paradigm scale: a reexamination. Journal of Environmental Education, 17(1): 9–12.
24. Gooch, G., 1995. Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 27(4): 513–539.
25. Goodin, R. E., 1996. Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives. Political Studies, 44(5): 835–849.
26. Hay, P., 2002. A companion to environmental thought, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
27. Jamison, A., 2003. Miljö som politik, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
28. nd edn), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Lalonde, R., and Jackson, E. L., 2002. The new environmental paradigm scale: has it outlived its usefulness?. Journal of Environmental Education, 33(4): 28–36.
30. Leopold, A., 1949. A sand county almanac, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Lundmark, C., 1998. Eco-democracy. A green challenge to democratic theory and practice, Umeå: Umeå University Press.
32. Mathews, F., 1994. The ecological self, London: Routledge.
33. Meadows, D. H., 1972. The limits to growth, New York: Universe Books. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind
34. Meyer, J. M., 2001. Political nature. Environmentalism and the interpretation of Western thought, Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
35. Milbrath, L. W., 1986. “ Environmental beliefs and values. Contemporary problems and issues ”. In Political psychology, Edited by: Hermann, M. G., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
36. Naess, A., 1973. The shallow and the deep: long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16: 95–99.
37. Naess, A., 1989. Ecology, community and lifestyle: outline of an ecosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Noe, F. P., and Snow, R., 1990. The new environmental paradigm and further scale analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 21: 20–26.
39. Ophuls, W., 1977. Ecology and the politics of scarcity, San Francisco: Freeman.
40. Pirages, D. C., and Ehrlich, P. R., 1974. Ark II: social responses to environmental imperatives, San Francisco: Freeman.
41. Regan, T., 1983. The case for animal rights, Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
42. Rothenberg, D., 1993. Is it painful to think? Conversations with Arne Naess, Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
43. Schlosberg, D., 2002. Environmental justice and the new pluralism. The challenge of difference for environmentalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Schultz, P. W., and Oskamp, S., 1996. Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: general environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59: 375–383.
45. Sessions, G., 1992. “ Ecocentrism, wilderness, and global ecosystem protection ”. In The wilderness condition: essays on environment and civilization, Edited by: Oelschlaeger, M., San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
46. Singer, P., 1977. Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals, New York: Avon Books.
47. Stenmark, M., 2000. Miljöetik och miljövård. Miljöfrågornas värderingsmässiga dimension, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
48. Stern, P. C., 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 407–424.
49. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., and Guagnano, G. A., 1995. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18): 1611–1636.
50. Taylor, P. W., 1992. “ The ethics of respect for nature ”. In The animal rights/environmental ethics debate. The environmental perspective, Edited by: Hargrove, E., New York: State University of New York Press.
51. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildavsky, A., 1990. Cultural theory, Boulder, San Francisco & Oxford: Westview Press.
52. Thompson, S. C. G., and Barton, M. A., 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14: 149–158.
53. Tingsten, H., 1969. Demokratiens problem, (6th edn), Stockholm: Bokförlaget aldus/Bonnier.
54. Vincent, A., 1992. Modern political ideologies, Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
55. Weigel, R. H., and Weigel, J., 1978. Environmental concern: the development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10: 3–15.
56. Widegren, Ö., 1998. The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30(1): 75–100.