A structural validation of an inventory based on the abridged five factor circumplex model (AB5C)

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 462-472

  Bäckström, Martin ^a   Larsson, Magnus R ^a   Maddux, Rachel E ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABRIDGED FIVE FACTOR CIRCUMPLEX MODEL; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTIONAL STABILITY; EXTRAVERSION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE (STATISTICS); SWEDEN; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY;

EID: 69249220160     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223890903088065     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aluja, A., García, O., & García, L. F. (2002). A comparative study of Zucker-man's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713-725.
2. Aluja, A., García, O., García, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the "NEO-PI-R" factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879-1889.
3. Bäckström, M. (2007). Higher order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 63-70.
4. Backström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335-344.
5. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824.
6. Bentler, P. (1989). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Burke, A. L. & Witt, A. L. (2004). Personality and high-maintenance employee behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 349-363.
9. Chuah, C. S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, W. B. (2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 359-376.
10. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 653-665.
11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. De Raad, B. (1998). Five big, big five issues: Rationale, content, structure, status and crosscultural assessment. European Psychologist, 3, 113-124.
13. De Raad, B., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347-364.
14. De Raad, B., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1993). A circumplex approach to the five factor model: A facet structure of trait adjectives supplemented by trait verbs. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 493-505.
15. DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the big five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151.
16. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896.
17. Digman, M. J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
18. Digman, M. J. (1997). Higher-order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
19. Edwards, L. K., & Edwards, A. L. (1991). A principal-components analysis of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory factor scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 766-772.
20. García, L. F., Aluja, A., García, Ó., & Cuevas, L. (2005). Is openness to experience an independent personality dimension? Convergent and discriminant validity of the openness domain and its NEO-PI-R facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 132-138.
21. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "Description of Personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
22. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
23. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
24. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
25. Gustafsson, J.E., & Stahl, P. A. (2005). STREAMS 3.0 user's guide. Mölndal, Sweden: MultivariateWare HB.
26. Hofstee, B. K. W. (2003). Structures of personality traits. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol.5. Personality and social psychology (pp. 231-254). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27. Hofstee, B. K. W., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, R. L. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
28. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 66-100). New York: Guildford.
29. Johnson, A. J., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five-factor model with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563-576.
30. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
31. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO personality inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182-191.
32. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, Jr. T. P., (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
33. McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561.
34. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, Jr., P. T., & Bond, M. H. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
35. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
36. Paunonen, S. V., Haddock, G., Forsterling, F., & Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17, 413-433.
37. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Assessing the big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. In B. de Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 30-54). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
38. Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893-898.
39. Tabachnick, G. B., & Fidell, S. L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
40. Wiggins, J. S. (1980). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 265-293). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.