Time and encoding effects in the concealed knowledge test

Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 177-187

  Seymour, Travis L ^a   Fraynt, Becky R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Applied psychology; Concealed knowledge test; Detection of deception; Guilty knowledge test; Law policy; Levels of processing; Lie detection; Response time measure

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONCEALED KNOWLEDGE TEST; CRIME; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; QUALITY CONTROL; RECORDING; RECUMBENCY; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 69249217806     PISSN: 10900586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-009-9092-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. JJ Allen WG Iacono KD Danielson 1992 The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences Psychophysiology 29 504 522
2. AD Baddeley 1978 The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research Psychological Review 85 139 152
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of human memory. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
4. G Ben-Shakhar K Dolev 1996 Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effect of mental countermeasures Journal of Applied Psychology 81 273 281
5. G Ben-Shakhar E Elaad 2003 The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review Journal of Applied Psychology 88 131 151
6. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective (p. 169). New York, NY, US: Springer.
7. MM Bradley MK Greenwald MC Petry PJ Lang 1992 Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 379 390
8. D Carmel E Dayan A Naveh O Raveh G Ben-Shakhar 2003 Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: The external validity of mock crime studies Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 261 269
9. S-Ãk Christianson EF Loftus 1991 Remembering emotional events: The fate of detailed information Cognition & Emotion 5 81 108
10. FI Craik RS Lockhart 1972 Levels of processing: A framework for memory research Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 11 671 684
11. E Elaad 1990 Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations Journal of Applied Psychology 75 521 529
12. E Elaad 1997 Polygraph examiner awareness of crime-relevant information and the guilty knowledge test Law and Human Behavior 21 107 120
13. E Elaad 1999 The challenge of the concealed knowledge polygraph test Expert Evidence 6 161 187
14. E Elaad A Ginton N Jungman 1992 Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests Journal of Applied Psychology 77 757 767
15. LA Farwell E Donchin 1991 The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials Psychophysiology 28 531 547
16. MR Furr R Rosenthal 2003 Evaluating theories efficiently: The nuts and bolts of contrast analysis Understanding Statistics 2 45 67
17. N Gronau G Ben-Shakhar A Cohen 2005 Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information Journal of Applied Psychology 90 147 158
18. CR Honts MK Devitt M Winbush JC Kircher 1996 Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test Psychophysiology 33 84 92
19. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2005). Scientific status: The case for polygraph tests. In D. L. Faigman, D. H. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony (Vol. 4). Minnesota: Thompson West.
20. EA Kensinger S Corkin 2003 Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition 31 1169 1180
21. LJ Kleinsmith S Kaplan 1963 Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 190 193
22. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
23. EF Loftus GR Loftus J Messo 1987 Some facts about "weapon focus" Law and Human Behavior 11 5 5 62
24. RE Lubow O Fein 1996 Pupillary size in response to a visual guilty knowledge test: New technique for the detection of deception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2 164 177
25. DT Lykken 1959 The GSR in the detection of guilt Journal of Applied Psychology 43 385 388
26. Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
27. M Mather LL Carstensen 2003 Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces Psychological Science 14 409 415
28. GE Matt C Vazquez WK Campbell 1992 Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review Clinical Psychology Review 12 227 255
29. Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 49-86). New York: Academic Press.
30. National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
31. AL Patalano CM Seifert 1994 Memory for impasses during problem solving Memory & Cognition 22 234 242
32. Podlesny, J. A. (2003). A paucity of operable case facts restricts applicability of the guilty knowledge technique in FBI criminal polygraph examinations. Forensic Science Communications, 5, Retrieved March 6, 2006, from http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july2003/index.htm.
33. DA Pollina AB Dollins SM Senter DJ Krapohl AH Ryan 2004 Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations Journal of Applied Psychology 89 1099 1105
34. Raskin, D. C. (Ed.). (1989). Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence. New York, NY: Springer.
35. JP Rosenfeld A Angell M Johnson J-h Qian 1991 An ERP-based, control-question lie detector analog: Algorithms for discriminating effects within individuals' average waveforms Psychophysiology 28 319 335
36. JP Rosenfeld JR Biroschak JJ Furedy 2006 P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms International Journal of Psychophysiology 60 251 259
37. JP Rosenfeld B Cantwell VT Nasman V Wojdac S Ivanov L Mazzeri 1988 A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test International Journal of Neuroscience 24 157 161
38. JP Rosenfeld M Soskins G Bosh A Ryan 2004 Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information Psychophysiology 41 205 219
39. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User's Guide (Version 1.1). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
40. TL Seymour JR Kerlin 2008 Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 475 490
41. TL Seymour CM Seifert MG Shafto AL Mosmann 2000 Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge" Journal of Applied Psychology 85 30 37
42. WM Waid EC Orne MR Cook MT Orne 1978 Effects of attention, as indexed by subsequent memory, on electrodermal detection of information Journal of Applied Psychology 63 728 733
43. WM Waid EC Orne MT Orne 1981 Selective memory for social information, alertness, and physiological arousal in the detection of deception Journal of Applied Psychology 66 224 232
44. WM Waid SK Wilson MT Orne 1981 Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 1118 1125