The relative safety of automated two-unit red blood cell procedures and manual whole-blood collection in young donors

Transfusion

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1874-1883

  Benjamin, Richard J ^a   Dy, Beth A ^a   Kennedy, Jean M ^a   Notari Iv, Edward P ^a   Eder, Anne F ^a  

^a National Headquarters   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; APHERESIS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION REACTION; CONSCIOUSNESS DISORDER; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MANUAL WHOLE BLOOD COLLECTION PROCEDURE; NORMAL HUMAN; SAFETY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TWO UNIT RED BLOOD CELL COLLECTION PROCEDURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BLOOD DONORS; BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; ERYTHROCYTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RED CROSS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69249176048     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02237.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Whitaker B, Sullivan M. The 2007 national blood collection and utilization survey report. Rockville (MD) : The United States Department of Health and Human Services 2008. Available from URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ophs/ bloodsafety/2007nbcus-survey.pdf
2. Popovsky MA. Safety of 2-RBC donation: donor and recipient considerations. Transfus Apher Sci 2006 35 : 3 4.
3. Popovsky MA. Guest editor's introduction to transfusion and apheresis science: red cell automation. Transfus Apher Sci 2006 34 : 203 4.
4. Wiltbank TB, Giordano GF. The safety profile of automated collections: an analysis of more than 1 million collections. Transfusion 2007 47 : 1002 5.
5. Eder AF, Hillyer CD, Dy BA, Notari EP, Benjamin RJ. Adverse reactions to allogeneic whole blood donation by 16- and 17-year-olds. JAMA 2008 299 : 2279 86.
6. Eder AF, Dy BA, Kennedy JM, Notari EP IV., Strupp A, Wissel ME, Reddy R, Gibble J, Haimowitz MD, Newman BH, Chambers LA, Hillyer CD, Benjamin RJ. The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006. Transfusion 2008 48 : 1809 19.
7. Poles FC, Boycott M. Syncope in blood donors. Lancet 1942 240 : 531 5.
8. Popovsky MA, Whitaker B, Arnold NL. Severe outcomes of allogeneic and autologous blood donation: frequency and characterization. Transfusion 1995 35 : 734 7.
9. Halperin D, Baetens J, Newman B. The effect of short-term, temporary deferral on future blood donation. Transfusion 1998 38 : 181 3.
10. Newman BH. Vasovagal reactions in high school students: findings relative to race, risk factor synergism, female sex, and non-high school participants. Transfusion 2002 42 : 1557 60.
11. Newman BH. Vasovagal reaction rates and body weight: findings in high- and low-risk populations. Transfusion 2003 43 : 1084 8.
12. Newman BH, Roth AJ. Estimating the probability of a blood donation adverse event based on 1000 interviewed whole-blood donors. Transfusion 2005 45 : 1715 21.
13. Newman BH, Newman DT, Ahmad R, Roth AJ. The effect of whole-blood donor adverse events on blood donor return rates. Transfusion 2006 46 : 1374 9.
14. Custer B, Johnson ES, Sullivan SD, Hazlet TK, Ramsey SD, Hirschler NV, Murphy EL, Busch MP. Quantifying losses to the donated blood supply due to donor deferral and miscollection. Transfusion 2004 44 : 1417 26.
15. Wiltbank TB, Giordano GF, Kamel H, Tomasulo P, Custer B. Faint and prefaint reactions in whole-blood donors: an analysis of predonation measurements and their predictive value. Transfusion 2008 48 : 1799 808.
16. Axelrod FB, Catton P, Beller SA. A comparison of post donation reactions in 2 unit automated red cell apheresis collections using the Haemonetics MCS+ with 1 unit manual whole blood collection in autologous donors. Transfusion 1995 35 Suppl l : 65S.
17. Schmidt AL, Randels J, Wieland M, Strauss RG. Collection of 2 unit autologous or allogeneic red blood cells by apheresis using Haemonetics MCS+. J Clin Apher 1997 12 : 41.
18. Newman BH, Satz SL, Janowicz NM, Siegfried BA. Donor reactions in high-school donors: the effects of sex, weight, and collection volume. Transfusion 2006 46 : 284 8.
19. Kamel H, James R, Bravo M, Tomasulo P, Custer B. Adverse reactions in whole blood and automated 2-unit red cell donations among 2RBC-eligible allogeneic male donors: a multivariate analyis. Vox Sang 2009 96 Suppl 1 P-187 (abstract).
20. Rader AW, France CR, Carlson B. Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections. Transfusion 2007 47 : 995 1001.
21. Notari EP IV, Zou S, Fang CT, Eder AF, Benjamin RJ, Dodd RY. Age-related donor return patterns among first-time blood donors in the United States. Transfusion 2009. In press.
22. Chambers LA, Kennedy JM, Dy BA. Increased rate of prefaint reactions to double red cell collections. Transfusion 2005 45 Suppl : 23A (abstract).
23. Halterman JS, Kaczorowski JM, Aligne CA, Auinger P, Szilagyi PG. Iron deficiency and cognitive achievement among school-aged children and adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics 2001 107 : 1381 6.
24. Moore SB, Winters JL. Multiple blood donations and iron deficiency in patients with restless legs syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 2003 78 : 654 5.
25. Radtke H, Mayer B, Rocker L, Salama A, Kiesewetter H. Iron supplementation and 2-unit red blood cell apheresis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Transfusion 2004 44 : 1463 7.