Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections

Transfusion

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 995-1001

  Rader, Aaron W ^b   France, Christopher R ^a   Carlson, Bruce ^b  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD DONOR; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; ERYTHROCYTE; FAINTNESS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPERVENTILATION; MALE; NAUSEA; PALLOR; PHLEBOTOMY; RED CROSS; RESTLESSNESS; SWEATING; UNCONSCIOUSNESS; VOMITING;

ATTITUDE; BLOOD DONORS; ERYTHROCYTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEUKAPHERESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PHLEBOTOMY;

EID: 34249019181     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01223.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wallace EL, Churchill WH, Surgenor DM, et al. Collection and transfusion of blood and blood components in the United States, 1992. Transfusion 1995 35 : 802 12.
2. Wallace EL, Churchill WH, Surgenor DM, Cho GS, McGurk S. Collection and transfusion of blood and blood components in the United States, 1994. Transfusion 1998 38 : 625 36.
3. Sullivan MT, Wallace EL. Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 1999. Transfusion 2005 45 : 141 8.
4. Ferguson E. Predictors of future behavior: a review of the psychological literature on blood donation. Br J Health Psychol 1996 1 : 287 308.
5. Linden JV, Gregorio DI, Kalish RI. An estimate of blood donor eligibility in the general population. Vox Sang 1988 54 : 96 100.
6. Wu Y, Glynn SA, Schreiber GB, et al. First-time blood donors: demographic trends. Transfusion 2001 41 : 360 4.
7. Zuck TF, Thomson RA, Schreiber GB, et al. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS): rationale and methods. Transfusion 1995 35 : 944 51.
8. Thomson RA, Bethel J, Lo AY, et al. Retention of "safe" blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study Transfusion 1998 38 : 359 67.
9. Popovsky MA. Multicomponent apheresis blood collection in the United States: current status and future directions. Transfus Apher Sci 2005 32 : 299 304.
10. Matthes GA. Options and cost effectiveness of multicomponent blood collection. Transfus Apher Sci 2002 27 : 115 21.
11. Harrison JF. Automated red cell collection - quality and value. Transfus Med 2006 16 : 155 64.
12. France CR, France JL, Roussos M, Ditto B. Mild reactions to blood donation predict a decreased likelihood of donor return. Transfus Apher Sci 2004 30 : 17 22.
13. Kaloupek DG, Scott JR, Khatami V. Assessment of coping strategies associated with syncope in blood donors. J Psychosom Res 1985 29 : 207 14.
14. Ogata H, Iinuma N, Nagashima K, Akabane T. Vasovagal reactions in blood donors. Transfusion 1980 20 : 679 83.
15. Sauer LA, France CR. Caffeine attenuates vasovagal reactions in female first-time blood donors. Health Psychol 1999 18 : 403 9.
16. Staallekker LA, Stammeijer RN, Dudok de Wit C. A Dutch blood bank and its donors. Transfusion 1980 20 : 66 70.
17. Newman BH, Newman DT, Ahmad R, Roth AJ. The effect of whole-blood donor adverse events on blood donor return rates. Transfusion 2006 46 : 1374 9.
18. France CR, Rader A, Carlson B. Donors who react may not come back: analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions. Transfus Apher Sci 2005 33 : 99 106.
19. Chambers LA, Kennedy JM, Dy B. Increased rate of prefaint reactions to double red cell collections. Transfusion 2005 45 (Suppl 23A.
20. Fry A. High school blood drives: the place for automation donations. Transfusion 2005 45 (Suppl 154A.
21. Newman BH. Vasovagal reaction rates and body weight: findings in high- and low-risk populations. Transfusion 2003 43 : 1084 8.
22. Newman BH. Vasovagal reactions in high school students: findings relative to race, risk factor synergism, female sex, and non-high school participants. Transfusion 2002 42 : 1557 60.