Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients

BJU International

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 840-846

  Shah, Hemendra ^a   Khandkar, Amit ^a   Sodha, Hiren ^a   Kharodawala, Shabbir ^a   Hegde, Sunil ^b   Bansal, Manish ^a  

^a RG Stone Urological Research Institute   (India)

^b Anaesthesiology   (India)

Author keywords

Complications; Kidney stone; PCNL; Percutaneous nephrostomy; Technique; Ureteric stent

Indexed keywords

DICLOFENAC; HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ANEMIA; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENCEPHALOMYELITIS; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FEVER; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATURIA; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OPERATION DURATION; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA; SEPSIS; SPLEEN INJURY; STAGHORN STONE; STENT RELATED PAIN; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69249146164     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08496.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2001 58 : 345 350
2. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 2004 172 : 565 567
3. Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, Tas A, Aydin S, Muslumanoglu AY. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 2007 39 : 57 63
4. Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA, Kharodawala SJ, Hegde SS, Bansal MB. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore versus tubeless. J Endourol 2008 22 : 1433 1439
5. Rana AM, Bhojwani JP, Junejo NN, Das Bhagia S. Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons? - with comprehensive technique. Urology 2008 71 : 581 585
6. Al-Ba'adani TH, Al-Kohlany KM, Al-Adimi A et al. Tubeless percutaneous neprolithotomy: the new gold standard. Int Urol Nephrol 2008 40 : 603 608
7. Abou-Elela A, Emran A, Mohsen MA, Reyad I, Bedair AS, Kader MA. Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Endourol 2007 21 : 977 984
8. Rana AM, Mithani S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day. J Endourol 2007 21 : 169 172
9. Shah HN, Hegde S, Shah JN, Mohile PD, Yuvaraja TB, Bansal MB. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2006 176 : 2488 2492
10. Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 2005 96 : 879 883
11. Marcovich R, Jacobson AI, Singh J et al. No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2004 18 : 743 747
12. Liatsikos EN, Hom D, Dinlenc CZ et al. Tail stent versus re-entry tube: a randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction. Urology 2002 59 : 15 9
13. Choi M, Brusky J, Weaver J, Amantia M, Bellman GC. Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small-bore tube. J Endourol 2006 20 : 766 770
14. Singh I, Singh A, Mittal G. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? J Endourol 2008 22 : 427 434
15. Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A, Bansal S, Yadav A, Goyal J. A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2008 22 : 439 442
16. Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Huri E, Ersekerci E, Karacagil M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safe even in supracostal access. J Endourol 2007 21 : 967 972
17. Giusti G, Piccinelli A, Taverna G et al. Miniperc? No, thank you!. Eur Urol 2007 51 : 810 815
18. Shah HN, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2006 20 : 1016 1021
19. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Hegde SS, Bansal M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with previous ipsilateral open renal surgery: a feasibility study with review of literature. J Endourol 2008 22 : 19 24
20. Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2005 66 : 500 504
21. Sofer M, Beri A, Friedman A et al. Extending the application of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2007 70 : 412 416
22. Limb J, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients. Urology 2002 59 : 527 531
23. Yang RM, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients. Urology 2004 63 : 1036 40
24. Karami H, Jabbari M, Arbab AH. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. 5 years of experience in 201 patients. J Endourol 2007 21 : 1411 1413
25. Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Holtz C, Ma W, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA. Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look? Urology 2008 71 : 218 222
26. Shpall AI, Parekh AR, Bellman GC. Modification of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: antegrade stent with flank tether. Urology 2006 68 : 880 882
27. Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2008 22 : 267 271
28. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007 51 : 899 906
29. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008 53 : 184 190