Iteratively constructive sequential design of experiments and surveys with nonlinear parameter-data relationships

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Guest, T ^a,b   Curtis, A ^a,b  

^a Edinburgh Collaborative of Subsurface Science and Engineering   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DATUM; ENTROPY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY;

EID: 69249142305     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2008JB005948     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards (2002), Quantitative Seismology, Univ. Science
2. Books, Calif. Atkinson, A., and A. Donev (1992), Optimum Experimental Designs, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
3. Barth, N., and C. Wunsch (1990), Oceanographic experiment design by simulated annealing, J. Phys. Oceanogr, 20(9), 1249-1263.
4. Box, G., and H. Lucas (1959), Design of experiments in non-linear situations, Biometrika, 46, 77-90.
5. Chaloner, K., and I. Verdinelli (1995), Bayesian experimental design: A review, Stat. Sci., 10(3), 273-304.
6. Curtis, A. (1999a), Optimal experiment design: Cross-borehole tomographic examples, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 637-650.
7. Curtis, A. ( 1999b), Optimal design of focused experiments and surveys, Geophys. J. Int., 139, 205-215.
8. Curtis, A. (2004a), Theory of model-based geophysical survey and experimental design: part 1. Linear problems, Leading Edge, 23(10), 997-1004.
9. Curtis, A. (2004b), Theory of model-based geophysical survey and experimental design: part 2. Nonlinear problems, Leading Edge, 23(10), 1112-1117.
10. Curtis, A., and H. Maurer (2000), Optimizing the design of geophysical experiments: Is it worthwhile?, Leading Edge, 10, 1059-1062.
11. Curtis, A.and R. Wood, (2004), Optimal elicitation of probabilistic information from experts, in Geological Prior Information, Geol. Soc. of London Spec. Publ. 239, edited by A. Curtis and R. Wood, Geol. Soc. of London, London.
12. Curtis, A., A. Michelini, D. Leslie, and A. Lomax (2004), A deterministic algorithm for experimental design applied to tomographic and microseismic monitoring surveys, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 595-606.
13. Fedorov, V. V. (1972), Theory of Optimal Experiments, Elsevier, New York.
14. Ford, I., D. M. Titterington, and C. P. Kitsos (1989), Recent advantages in nonlinear experimental design, Technometrics, 31(1), 49-51.
15. Furman, A., T. P. A. Ferre, and A. W. Warrick (2004), Optimization of ert surveys for monitoring transient hydrological events using perturbation sensitivity and genetic algorithms, Vadose Zone J., 3, 1230-1239.
16. Furman, A., T. P. A. Ferre, and G. L. Heath (2007), Spatial focusing of electrical resistivity surveys considering geologic and hydrologie layering, Geophysics, 72(2), F65-F73.
17. Hamada, M., H. F. Martz, C. S. Reese, and A. G. Wilson (2001), Finding near-optimal bayesian experimental designs via genetic algorithms, Am. Stat., 55(3), 175-181.
18. Hu, I. (1998), On sequential designs in nonlinear problems, Biometrika, 85(2), 496-503.
19. Kijko, A. (1977a), An algorithm for the optimal distribution of a regional seismic network, I, Pure Appl. Geophys., 115, 999-1009.
20. Kijko, A. (1977b), An algorithm for the optimum distribution of a regional seismic network: II. An analysis of the accuracy of location of local earthquakes depending on the number of seismic stations, Pure Appl. Geophys., 115, 1011-1021.
21. Lindley, D. (1956), On a measure of the information provided by an experiment, Ann. Math. Stat., 27(4), 986-1005.
22. Maurer, H., and D. E. Boerner (1998), Optimized design of geophysical experiments, Leading Edge, 17(8), 1119.
23. Maurer, H., D. E. Boerner, and A. Curtis (2000), Design strategies for electomagnetic geophysical surveys, Inverse Probl., 16, 1097-1117.
24. Muller, P., and G. Parmigiani (1996), Numerical evaluation of informationtheoretic measures, in Bayesian Analysis in Statistics and Economics: Essays in Honor of Arnold Zellner, edited by D. Berry, K. Chaloner, and J. Geweke, pp. 397-406, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, N. J.
25. Rabinowitz, N., and D. M. Steinberg (2000), A statistical outlook on the problem of seismic network configuration, in Advances in Seismic Event Location, Modern Approaches in Geophysics, vol. 13, edited by C. Thurber and N. Rabinowitz, chap. 3, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
26. Ryan, K. J. (2003), Estimating expected information gains for experimental designs with application to the random fatigue-limit model, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 12(3), 585-603.
27. Shannon, C. E. (1948), A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, 623-656.
28. Shewry, M. C., and H. P. Wynn (1987), Maximum entropy sampling, J. Appl. Stat., 14, 165-170.
29. Silvey, S. D. (1980), Optimal Design - An Introduction to the Theory for Parameter Estimation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
30. Steinberg, D. M., N. Rabinowitz, Y. Shimshoni, and D. Mizrachi (1995), Configuring a seismographic network for optimal monitoring of fault lines and multiple sources, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85(6), 1847-1857.
31. Stummer, P., H. Maurer, H. Horstmeyer, and A. G. Green (2002), Optimization of dc resistivity data acquisition: Real-time experimental design and a new multielectrode system, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote, 40(12), 2727-2735.
32. Stummer, P., H. Maurer, and A. G. Green (2004), Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information, Geophysics, 69(1), 120-139.
33. van den Berg, J., A. Curtis, and J. Trampert (2003), Optimal nonlinear bayesian experimental design: An application to amplitude versus offset experiments, Geophys. J. Int., 155, 411-421.
34. Wilkinson, P., J. Chambers, P. Meldrum, R. Ogilvy, and S. Caunt (2006), Optimization of array configurations and panel combinations for the detection and imaging of abadoned mineshafts using 3d crosshole electrical resistivity tomography, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., II, 213-221.
35. Winterfors, E., and A. Curtis (2008), Numerical detection and reduction of non-uniqueness in nonlinear inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 24(2), 025,016, 14 pp.
36. Yilmaz, Ö. (2001), Seismic Data Analysis, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Okla.