Optimal nonlinear Bayesian experimental design: An application to amplitude versus offset experiments

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 411-421

  van den Berg, Jojanneke ^a   Curtis, Andrew ^b,c   Trampert, Jeannot ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b SCHLUMBERGER CAMBRIDGE RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Design; Experimental; Inversion; Nonlinear; Survey

Indexed keywords

AVO METHOD; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DATA;

EID: 0344035468     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02048.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aki, K. & Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitave Seismology: Theory and Methods, San Francisco: Freeman.
2. Atkinson, A.C. & Donev, A.N., 1992. Optimum Experimental Design, Oxford Science Publications.
3. Box, G.E.P. & Lucas, H.L., 1959. Design of Experiments in Non-linear Situations, Biometrika, 46, 77-90.
4. Chaloner, K. & Verdinelli, I., 1995. Bayesian Experimental Design: A Review, Statistical Science, 10, 273-304.
5. Curtis, A., 1999a. Optimal Experiment Design: Cross-borehole Tomographic Examples, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 637-650.
6. Curtis, A., 1999b. Optimal Design of Focused Experiments and Surveys, Geophys. J. Int., 139, 205-215.
7. Curtis, A. & Maurer, H., 2000. Optimizing designs of geophysical experiments and surveys: Is it worthwhile?, EOS. Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 81, 20, 224-225.
8. Curtis, A. & Spencer, C., 1999. Survey Design Strategies for linearized nonlinear inversion, 69th Annual Int. Meeting, Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1775-1778.
9. Ford, I., Titterington, D.M. & Kitsos, C.P., 1989. Recent Advances in Non-linear Experimental Design, Technometrics, 31, 49-60.
10. Johnson, N.L. & Leone, F.C., 1977. Statistics and Experimental Design in Engineering and the Physical Sciences, Wiley series in probabability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York.
11. Lepage, G.P., 1978. A New Algorithm for Adaptive Multidimensional Integration, Journal of Computational Physics, 27, 192-203.
12. Sebastiani, P. & Wynn, H.P., 2000. Maximum Entropy Sampling and Optimal Bayesian Experimental Design, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 62, 145-157.
13. Shannon, C.E., 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Tech. J., 27, 379-423.
14. Shewry, M.C. & Wynn, H.P., 1987. Maximum Entropy Sampling, Journal of Applied Statistics, 14, 165-170.
15. Squires, G.L., 1985. Practical Physics, 3rd edn, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
16. Tarantola, A., 1987. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Parameter Estimation, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
17. Tarantola, A. & Valette, B., 1982. Inverse Problems = Quest for Information, J. Geophys., 50, 159-170.
18. Yilmaz, O., 2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion and Interpretation of Seismic Data, Society of Exploration Geophysics.