Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial

Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 323-329

  Emanuele, Nicholas ^a   Klein, Ronald ^b   Moritz, Thomas ^c   Davis, Matthew D ^d   Glander, Kathleen ^d   Anderson, Robert ^e   Reda, Domenic ^c   Duckworth, William ^f   Abraira, Carlos ^g  

^a HINES VA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Hines VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e VA NEBRASKA WESTERN IOWA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^f CARL T HAYDEN VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Photography; Retinopathy; Retinopathy screening; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE FUNDUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETINA MACULA EDEMA;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MACULAR EDEMA; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PHOTOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 69249114696     PISSN: 10568727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abraira C., Duckworth W., McCarren M., Emanuele N., Arca D., Reda D., and Henderson W. Design of the cooperative study on glycemic control and complications in diabetes mellitus Type 2 (Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial). Journal of Diabetes and its Complications 17 (2003) 314-322
2. Cohen J., and Fleiss J.L. Equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33 (1973) 613-619
3. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1960) 37-46
4. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 823-833
5. Emanuele N., Sacks G., Klein R., Duckworth W., Abraira C., and VADT Group. Ethnicity, race and basal retinopathy correlates in the Veterans Diabetes Trial. Diabetes Care 28 (2005) 1954-1958
6. Harding S.P., Broadbent D.M., Neoh C., White M.C., and Vora J. Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: The Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. BMJ 311 (1995) 1131-1135
7. Hutchinson A., McIntosh A., Peters J., O'Keeffe C., Khunti K., Baker R., and Booth A. Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy-a systematic review. Diabetic Medicine 17 (2000) 495-506
8. Kinyoun J.L., Barton F., Fisher M., Hubbard L., Aiello L., and Ferris III F. Detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 5. The ETDRS Research Group. Ophthalmology 96 (1989) 746-750
9. Kinyoun J.L., Martin D.C., Fujimoto W.Y., and Leonetti D.L. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 33 (1992) 1888-1893
10. Lawrence M.G. The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: An analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 102 (2004) 321-340
11. Lee V.S., Kingsley R.M., Lee E.T., Lu M., Russell D., Asal N.R., Bradford Jr. R.H., and Wilkinson C.P. The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography. Ophthalmology 100 (1993) 1504-1512
12. Lin D.Y., Blumenkranz M.S., and Brothers R. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 1 (1999) 477-487
13. Moss S., Klein R., Kessler S., and Richie K. Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 92 (1985) 62-67
14. Nathan D., Fogel H., Godine J., Lou P., D'Amico D., Regan C., and Topping T. Role of diabetologist in evaluating diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 14 (1991) 26-33
15. Pugh J., Jacobson J., Van Heuven W., Watters J., Tuley M., Lairson D., Lorimor R., Kapadia A., and Velez R. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care 16 (1993) 889-895
16. Scanlon P.H., Malhotra R., Greenwood R.H., Aldington S.J., Foy C., Flatman M., and Downes S. Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy. British Journal of Ophthalmology 87 (2003) 1258-1263
17. Sussman E., Tsiaras W., and Soper K. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 247 (1982) 3231-3234
18. Whited J.D. Accuracy and reliability of teleophthalmology for diagnosing diabetic retinopathy and macular edema: A review of the literature. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 8 (2006) 102-111