Broad motives in short scales: A questionnaire for the zurich model of social motivation

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 141-149

  Schönbrodt, Felix D ^a,c   Unkelbach, Sven R ^b   Spinath, Frank M ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evolution; Motivation; Questionnaire construction and validation; Zurich model of social motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249096682     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.141     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Asendorpf, J.B. (2000). Idiographische und nomothetische Ansätze in der Psychologie [Ideographic and nomothetic ap-proaches in psychology]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 208, 72-90.
2. Asendorpf, J.B. (2004). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit [The psychology of personality] (3. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
3. Bischof, N. (1975). A systems approach toward the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Development, 46, 801-817.
4. Bischof, N. (1993). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation I: Die Regulation der sozialen Distanz - Von der Feldtheorie zur Systemtheorie [On the regulation of social distance - From field theory to systems theory]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 5-43.
5. Bischof, N. (2001). Das Rätsel Ödipus. Die biologischenWurzeln des Urkonflikts von Intimität und Autonomie [The riddle of Oedipus: The biological roots fo the core conflict between intimacy and autonomy]. München: Piper.
6. Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1991). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung fünf robuster Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [A questionnaire for assessing five robust personality factors]. Diagnostica, 37(1), 29-41.
8. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books.
9. Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
10. Diamond, L.M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116-119.
11. Gubler, H., & Bischof, N. (1991). A systems theory perspective. In M.E. Lamb & H. Keller (Eds.), Infant development: Perspectives from German-speaking countries (pp. 35-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Gubler, H., & Bischof, N. (1993). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation II: Computerspiele als Werkzeug der motivationspsychologischen Grundlagenforschung [Computer games as a tool for basic research on motivation]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 287-315.
13. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P.R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1-22. (Pubitemid 124006509)
14. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor-analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
15. Jackson, D.N. (1967). Manual for the personality research form. Goshen: Research Psychologist Press.
16. Körner, A., Geyer, M., & Brähler, E. (2002). Das NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI): Validierung anhand einer deutschen Bevölkerungsstichprobe [German validation of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory]. Diagnostica, 48, 19-27.
17. Lamb, M.E., Bornstein, M.H., & Teti, D.M. (2002). Development in infancy: An introduction (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Lamb, M.E., & Keller, H. (1991). Infant development: Perspectives from German-speaking countries. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. McClelland, D.C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
20. Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Murray, H.A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Pollak, S.D. (2005). Early adversity and mechanisms of plasticity: Integrating affective neuroscience with developmental approaches to psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 735-752.
23. Schmalt, H.-D., Sokolowski, K., & Langens, T. (2000). Das Multi- Motiv-Gitter für Anschluß, Leistung und Macht (MMG): Manual [The Multi-Motive-Grid for affiliation, achievement, and power (MMG): Manual]. Frankfurt am Main: Swets & Zeitlinger.
24. Schultheiss, O.C. (2001). An information processing account of implicit motive arousal. In M.L. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 12: New directions in measures and methods) (pp. 1-41). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25. Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.-D., Langens, T.A., & Puca, R.M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: The Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126-145.
26. Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D.N., & Beloch- Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF): Handanweisung [German Personality Research Form (PRF): Manual]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
27. Winter, D.G., John, O.P., Stewart, A.J., Klohnen, E.C., &Duncan, L.E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230-250.