Validation of the spatial hearing questionnaire

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 466-474

  Tyler, Richard S ^a   Perreau, Ann E ^a   Ji, Haihong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINAURAL HEARING; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSIC; NOISE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SELF EVALUATION; SOUND DETECTION; SPATIAL HEARING QUESTIONNAIRE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69049108722     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61efe     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Colburn, H. S., Zurek, P. M., Durlach, N. I. (1987). Binaural directional hearing-impairments and aids. In W.A. Yost & G. Gourevitch (Eds). Directional Hearing (pp, 261-278). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 16, 176-186.
3. Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (1999). Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear Hear, 20, 306-334.
4. Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (2001). Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear, 22, 151-160.
5. Dunn, C. C., Tyler, R. S., Witt, S. A. (2005). Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 48, 668-680.
6. Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Skinner, M. W., et al. (2004). Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear, 25, 375-387.
7. Flamme, G. A. (2001). Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests. Trends Amplif, 5, 111-138.
8. Gatehouse, S. (1999). Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 80-103.
9. Gatehouse, S., & Noble, W. (2004). The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85-99. (Pubitemid 38295489)
10. Gifford, R. H., Shallop, J. K., Peterson, A. M. (2008). Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurootol, 13, 193-205.
11. Hawley, M.L., Litovsky, R. L., Colburn, H. S. (1999). Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 3436-3448.
12. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Measure, 20, 141-151.
13. Laszig, R., Aschendorff, A., Stecker, M., et al. (2004). Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the Nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol, 25, 958-968. (Pubitemid 39496818)
14. Litovsky, R., Parkinson, A., Arcaroli, J., et al. (2006). Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear, 27, 714-731. (Pubitemid 44691232)
15. MacKeith, N. W., & Coles, R. R. (1971). Binaural advantages in hearing of speech. J Laryngol Otol, 85, 213-232.
16. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
17. Noble, W. (1998). Self-Assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London, UK: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
18. Noble, W. (2006). Bilateral hearing aids: A review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting. Int J Audiol, 45, 63-71.
19. Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2004). Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol, 43, 100-114. (Pubitemid 38295490)
20. Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2006). Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 45, 172-181. (Pubitemid 43315654)
21. Noble, W., Ter-Horst, K., Byrne, D. (1995). Disabilities and handicaps associated with impaired auditory localization. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 129-140.
22. Nopp, P., Schleich, P., D'Haease, P. (2004). Sound localization in bilateral users of Med-El COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 25, 205-214. (Pubitemid 38736304)
23. Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Pract Assess Res Evaluat, 9. Retrieved June 4, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=11.
24. Peissig, J., & Kollmeier, B. (1997). Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal hearing and impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 1660-1670. (Pubitemid 27114270)
25. Ruscetta, M. N., Palmer, C. V., Durrant, J. D., et al. (2005). Validity, internal consistency, and test/retest reliability of a localization disabilities and handicaps questionnaire. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 585-595.
26. Tillman, T. W., & Carhart, R. (1966). An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Technical Report No SAM-TR-66-, 55, 1-12.
27. Tyler, R. S., Dunn, C. C., Witt, S. A., et al. (2006a). Soundfield hearing for patients with cochlear implants and hearing aids. In H. R. Cooper & L. C. Craddock (Eds). Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide (pp, 338-365). London, UK: Whurr Publishers.
28. Tyler, R. S., Dunn, C. C., Witt, S. A., et al. (2007). Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 28, 86S-90S.
29. Tyler, R. S., Gantz, B. J., Rubinstein, J. T., et al. (2002). Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 23, 80S-89S.
30. Tyler, R. S., Noble, W., Dunn, C., et al. (2006b). Some benefits and limitations of binaural cochlear implants and our ability to measure them. Int J Audiol, 45 (Suppl 1), S113-S119. (Pubitemid 44385184)
31. Van Hoesel, R. J. M., & Tyler, R. S. (2003). Speech perception, localization and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1617-1630.
32. Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear, 3, 128-134.
33. Vershuur, C. A., Lutman, M. E., Ramsden, R., et al. (2005). Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurol, 26, 965-971. (Pubitemid 41330713)
34. Walden, B. E., Demorest, M. E., Hepler, E. L. (1984). Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 49-56.
35. Zurek, P. M. (1993). Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In G. A. Studebaker & I. Hochberg (Eds). Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.