Coronary artery disease: Assessment with a comprehensive MR imaging protocol - Initial results

Radiology

Volumn 225, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 300-307

  Plein, Sven ^a   Ridgway, John P ^a   Jones, Tim R ^a   Bloomer, Timothy N ^a   Sivananthan, Mohan U ^a  

^a LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coronary vessels, MR; Heart, function; Heart, perfusion; Myocardium, MR

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0036788357     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2243011436     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. van der Geest RJ, Lelieveldt BP, Reiber JH. Quantification of global and regional ventricular function in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:348-358.
2. Pflugfelder PW, Sechtem UP, White RD, Higgins CB. Quantification of regional myocardial function by rapid cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150: 523-529.
3. Holman ER, Vliegen HW, van der Geest RJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of regional left ventricular function after myocardial infarction in the pig assessed with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:161-169.
4. Buser PT, Auffermann W, Holt WW, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of global left ventricular function with the use of cine nuclear magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:1294-1300.
5. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 204:373-384.
6. Cullen JHS, Horshfield MA, Reek CR, Cherryman GR, Barnett DB, Samani NJ. A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first pass contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:1386-1394.
7. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000; 101:1379-1383.
8. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001; 103:2230-2235.
9. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445-1453.
10. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100:1992-2002.
11. Danias PG, Manning WJ. Coronary MR angiography: current status. Herz 2000; 25:431-439.
12. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, et al. Double-oblique free-breathing high resolution three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:524-531.
13. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:828-832.
14. Sandstede JJW, Pabst T, Beer M, et al. Three-dimensional MR coronary angiography using the navigator technique compared with conventional coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:135-139.
15. Regenfus M, Ropers D, Achenbach S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:44-50.
16. Chia JM, Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 678-688.
17. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:952-962.
18. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2001; 219:828-834.
19. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:264-269.
20. Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, et al. Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 230-236.
21. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Boesiger P. Sensitivity encoded cardiac MR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001; 3:1-10.
22. Kim WY, Stuber M, Kissinger KV, Andersen NT, Manning WJ, Botnar RM. Impact of bulk coronary motion on right coronary MR angiography and vessel wall imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:383-390.
23. Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergmann GW. Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability of the rest period and implication for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 213:751-758.
24. Sensky PR, Jivan A, Hudson NM, et al. Coronary artery disease: combined stress MR imaging protocol-one-stop evaluation of myocardial perfusion and function. Radiology 2000; 215:608-614.