Increasing numbers of bird species result from taxonomic progress, not taxonomic inflation

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 276, Issue 1670, 2009, Pages 3184-3191

  Sangster, George ^a,b  

^a NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Species concepts; Species criteria; Species limits; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; BIRD; COALESCENCE; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; BIRD; MONOPHYLY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES; TAXONOMY; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AVES; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 68949160964     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0582     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agapow, P.-M. & Sluys, R. 2005 The reality of taxonomic change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 278-280. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.001)
2. Buckley, P. A. & Buckley, F. G. 2004 Rapid speciation by a Lesser Antillean endemic, Barbados Bullfinch Loxigilla barbadensis. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club 124, 108-123.
3. Chaitra, M. S., Vasudevan, K. & Shanker, K. 2004 The biodiversity bandwagon: the splitters have it. Curr. Sci. 86, 897-899.
4. Clark, W. S. & Banks, R. C. 1992 The taxonomic status of the White-tailed Kite. Wilson Bull. 104, 571-579.
5. Clements, J. F. 2007 The Clements checklist of birds of the world, 6th edn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Cotterill, F. P. D. 2006 Taxonomic status and conservation importance of the avifauna of Katanga (south-east Congo Basin) and its environs. Ostrich 77, 1-21.
7. Cracraft, J. 1983 Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr. Ornithol. 3, 159-187.
8. Cracraft, J., Feinstein, J., Vaughn, J. & Helm-Bychowski, K. 1998 Sorting out tigers (Panthera tigris): mitochondrial sequences, nuclear inserts, systematics, and conservation genetics. Anim. Conserv. 1, 139-150. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00021.x)
9. Daugherty, C. H., Cree, A., Hay, J. M. & Thompson, M. B. 1990 Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of the tuatara (Sphenodon). Nature 347, 177-179. (doi:10.1038/347177a0)
10. de Queiroz, K. 2007 Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 56, 879-886. (doi:10.1080/10635150701701083)
11. Donoghue, M. J. 1985 A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88, 172-181. (doi:10.2307/3243026)
12. Dubois, A. 1998 Lists of European species of amphibians and reptiles: will we soon be reaching 'stability'? Amphibia-Reptilia 19, 1-28. (doi:10.1163/156853898X00304)
13. Dubois, A. 2003 The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. C. R. Biol. Suppl. 1, 9-21. (doi:10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00022-2)
14. Dubois, A. 2008 A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 93, 857-863. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00900.x)
15. Freitag, S. & Robinson, T. J. 1993 Phylogeographic patterns in mitochondrial DNA of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Auk 110, 614-622.
16. Glaw, F. & Köhler, J. 1998 Amphibian species diversity exceeds that of mammals. Herpetol. Rev. 29, 11-12.
17. Groves, C. 2001 Why taxonomic stability is a bad idea, or why are there so few species of primates (or are there?). Evol. Anthropol. 10, 192-198. (doi:10.1002/evan.10005)
18. Haffer, J. 1992 The history of species concepts and species limits in ornithology. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club Centenary Suppl 112A, 107-158.
19. Hanken, J. 1999 Why are there so many new amphibian species when amphibians are declining? Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 7-8. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01534-1)
20. Harris, D. J. & Froufe, E. 2005 Taxonomic inflation: species concept or historical geopolitical bias? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 6-7. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.004)
21. Hartert, E. 1903-1922 Die Vögel der Paläarktischen Fauna, vol. 3. Berlin, Germany: Friedländer & Sohn.
22. Isaac, N. J. B., Mallet, J. & Mace, G. M. 2004 Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 464-469. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.004)
23. Isaac, N. J. B., Mace, G. M. & Mallet, J. 2005 Response to Agapow and Sluys: the reality of taxonomic change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 280-281. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.007)
24. Kennedy, M. & Spencer, H. G. 2000 Phylogeny, biogeography, and taxonomy of Australasian teals. Auk 117, 154-163. (doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0154:PBATOA]2.0.CO;2)
25. Knapp, S., Lughadha, E. N. & Paton, A. 2005 Taxonomic inflation, species concepts and global species lists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 7-8. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.001)
26. Köhler, J., Vieites, D. R., Bonett, R. M., Hita-García, F., Glaw, F., Steincke, D. & Vences, M. 2005 Boost in species discoveries in a highly endangered vertebrate group: new amphibians and global conservation. BioScience 55, 693-696. (doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0693: NAAGCA]2.0.CO;2)
27. Kraus,O. 2002 Why no subspecies in spiders? In European Arachnology 2000: 19th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Aarhus, Denmark, 17-22 July 2000 (eds S. Toft & N. Scharff), pp. 303-314. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
28. Mayden, R. L. 1997 A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Species, the units of biodiversity. Systematics Association Special, vol. 54 (eds M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah & M. R. Wilson), pp. 381-424. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
29. Mayr, E. 1982 The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Mayr, E. & Amadon, D. 1951 A classification of recent birds. Am. Mus. Novit. 1496, 1-42.
31. Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G. W. (eds) 1979 Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
32. Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G.W. (eds) 1986 Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
33. Mayr, E. & Diamond, J. 2001 The birds of northern Melanesia: speciation, ecology, and biogeography. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Mayr, E. & Greenway, J. C. (eds) 1960 Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 9. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
35. Mayr, E. & Greenway, J. C. (eds) 1962 Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 15. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
36. Mayr, E. & Paynter, R. A. (eds) 1964 Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 10. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
37. Minelli, A. 1993 Biological systematics: the state of the art. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
38. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853-858. (doi:10.1038/35002501)
39. Outlaw, D. C., Voelker, G., Mila, B. & Girman, D. J. 2003 Evolution of long-distance migration in and the historical biogeography of Catharus thrushes: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Auk 120, 299-310. (doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0299:EOLMIA]2.0.CO;2)
40. Padial, J.M. & de la Riva, I. 2006 Taxonomic inflation and the stability of species lists: the perils of ostrich's behavior. Syst. Biol. 55, 859-867. (doi:10.1080/1063515060081588)
41. Paynter, R. A. (ed.) 1967-1970 Check-list of birds of the world, vols 12-14. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
42. Penhallurick, J. & Wink, M. 2004 Analysis of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the Procellariiformes based on complete nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Emu 104, 125-147. (doi:10.1071/MU01060)
43. Perrin, M.R. 2005 A review of the taxonomic status and biology of the Cape parrot Poicephalus robustus, with reference to the brown-necked parrot P. fuscicollis fuscicollis and the grey-headed parrot P. f. suahelicus. Ostrich 76, 195-205.
44. Peters, J. L. 1931-1951 Check-list of birds of the world, vols 1-7. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
45. Phillimore, A. B. & Owens, I. P. F. 2006 Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology? Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1049-1053. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3425)
46. Rheindt, F. E. & Austin, J. J. 2005 Major analytical and conceptual shortcomings in a recent taxonomic revision of the Procellariiformes - a reply to Penhallurick and Wink (2004). Emu 105, 181-186. (doi:10.1071/MU04039)
47. Rohwer, S. & Manning, J. 1990 Differences in timing and number of molts for Baltimore and Bullock's Orioles: implications to hybrid fitness and theories of delayed plumage maturation. Condor 92, 125-140. (doi:10.2307/1368391)
48. Sharpe, R. B. 1909 A hand-list of the genera and species of birds, vol. 5. London, UK: British Museum.
49. Tattersall, I. 2007 Madagascar's lemurs: cryptic diversity or taxonomic inflation? Evol. Anthropol. 16, 12-23. (doi:10.1002/evan.20126)
50. Tobias, J. A., Bates, J. M., Hackett, S. J. & Seddon, N. 2008 Comment on 'The latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals'. Science 319, 901c. (doi:10.1126/science.1150568)
51. Traylor, M. A. (ed.) 1979 In Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 8. Cambridge, MA: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
52. Vernon, K. 1993 Desperately seeking status: evolutionary systematics and the taxonomists' search for respectability 1940-60. Br. J. Hist. Sci. 26, 207-227. (doi:10.1017/S0007087400030764)
53. Wilmé, L., Goodman, S. M. & Ganzhorn, J. U. 2006 Biogeographic evolution of Madagascar's microendemic biota. Science 312, 1063-1065. (doi:10.1126/science.1122806)
54. Zimmer, K. J. & Whittaker, A. 2000 The Rufous Cacholote is two species (Furnariidae: Pseudoseisura). Condor 102, 409-422. (doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0409:TRCFPI]2.0.CO;2)
55. Zink, R. M. & McKitrick, M. C. 1995 The debate over species concepts and its implications for ornithology. Auk 112, 701-719.