Demonstration of an eye-movement-induced visual motion illusion (Filehne illusion) in Rhesus monkeys

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2009, Pages

  Dash, Suryadeep ^a   Dicke, Peter W ^a   Chakraborty, Subhojit ^b   Haarmeier, Thomas ^a   Thier, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Perceptual organization; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MACACA; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PURSUIT, SMOOTH; RETINA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 68949149672     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.9.5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barlow, H. B., & Hill, R. M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall illusion. Nature, 200, 1345-1347.
2. Bell, C. C. (2001). Memory-based expectations in electro-sensory systems. Current Opinion Neurobiology, 11, 481-487.
3. Burge, J., Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2008). The statistical determinants of the adaptation rate in human reaching. Journal of Vision, 8(4):20, 1-19, http://journalofvision.org/8/4/20/, doi:10.1167/8.4.20.
4. Dicke, P. W., Chakraborty, S., & Thier, P. (2008). Neuronal correlates of perceptual stability during eye movements. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 991-1002.
5. Filehne, W. (1922). Über das optische Wahrnehmen von Bewegungen. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 53, 134-145.
6. Freeman, T. C. (1999). Path perception and Filehne illusion compared: Model and data. Vision Research, 39, 659-667.
7. Freeman, T. C. (2007). Simultaneous adaptation of retinal and extra-retinal motion signals. Vision Research, 47, 3373-3384.
8. Freeman, T. C., & Banks, M. S. (1998). Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors. Vision Research, 38, 41-945.
9. Goltz, H. C., DeSouza, J. F. X., Menon, R. S., Tweed, D. B., & Vilis, T. (2003). Interaction of retinal image and eye velocity in motion perception. Neuron, 39, 569-576.
10. Haarmeier, T., Bunjes, F., Lindner, A., Berret, E., & Thier, P. (2001). Optimizing visual motion perception during eye movements. Neuron, 32, 527-535.
11. Haarmeier, T., & Thier, P. (1996). Modification of the Filehne illusion by conditioning visual stimuli. Vision Research, 36, 741-750.
12. Haarmeier, T., & Thier, P. (1998). An electrophysiological correlate of visual motion awareness in man. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 464-471.
13. Judge, S. J., Richmond, B. J., & Chu, F. C. (1980). Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method. Vision Research, 20, 535-538.
14. Kanai, R., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2005). Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Research, 45, 3109-3116.
15. Keck, M. J., & Pentz, B. (1977). Recovery from adaptation to moving gratings. Perception, 6, 719-725.
16. Keller, E. L., & Khan, N. S. (1986). Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey. Vision Research, 26, 943-955.
17. Kodaka, Y., Miura, K., Suehiro, K., Takemura, A., & Kawano, K. (2004). Ocular tracking of moving targets: Effects of perturbing the background. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 2474-2483.
18. Liebermann, H. R., & Pentland, A. P. (1982). Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The best PEST. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14, 21-25.
19. Lindner, A., Haarmeier, T., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Thier, P. (2006). Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1899-1912.
20. Mack, A., & Herman, E. (1973). Position constancy during pursuit eye movements: An investigation of the Filehne illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 71-84.
21. Mack, A., & Herman, E. (1978). The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements. Vision Research, 18, 55-62.
22. Mather, G., Vestraten, F., & Anstis, S. (Eds.) (1998). The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A., & Teller, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 286-298.
24. Mohrmann, H., & Thier, P. (1995). The influence of structured visual backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation, steady state pursuit and smooth-pursuit termination. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 83-93.
25. Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 43, 482-489.
26. Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 782-787.
27. Thier, P., & Erickson, R. G. (1992). Responses of visualtracking neurons from cortical area MST-l to visual, eye and head motion. European Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 539-553.
28. Thier, P., Haarmeier, T., Chakraborty, S., Lindner, A., & Tikhonov, A. (2001). Cortical substrates of perceptual stability during eye movements. Neuroimage, 14, S33-S39.
29. Thompson, P. (1880). Optical illusions of motion. Brain, 3, 289-298.
30. Tikhonov, A., Haarmeier, T., Thier, P., Braun, C., & Lutzenberger, W. (2004). Neuromagnetic activity in medial parieto-occipital cortex reflects the perception of visual motion during eye movements. Neuroimage, 21, 593-600.
31. Verstraten, F. A. J., Fredericksen, R. E., Grüsser, O.-J., & van der Grind, W. A. (1994). Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion. Vision Research, 34, 1149-1155.
32. von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464-476.
33. Wertheim, A. H. (1994). Motion perception during self-motion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited. Behavioral Brain Science, 17, 293-355.