Modification of the Filehne illusion by conditioning visual stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 741-750

  Haarmeier, Thomas ^a   Thier, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Motion perception; Perceptual stability; Smooth pursuit

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETINA IMAGE; SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0029914975     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00154-9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anstis, S. M. & Gregory, R. L. (1965). The after-effect of seen motion: The role of retinal stimulation and of eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 173-174.
2. Barlow, H. B. & Hill, R. M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall illusion and of eye movements. Nature, 200, 1434-1435.
3. Brenner, E. (1993). Judging an object's velocity when its distance changes due to ego-motion. Vision Research, 33, 487-504.
4. Cornsweet, T. (1962). The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485-491.
5. Ehrenstein, W. H., Mateeff, S. & Hohnsbein, J. (1986). Temporal aspects of of position constancy during ocular pursuit. Pflügers Archiv, 406, R15, 47.
6. Ehrenstein, W. H., Mateeff, S. & Hohnsbein, J. (1987). Influence of exposure duration on the strength of the Filehne illusion. Perception, 16, 253 (A29b).
7. Erlebacher, A. & Sekuler, R. (1971). Response frequency equilization: A bias model for psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 315-320.
8. Filehne, W. (1922). Über das optische Wahrnehmen von Bewegungen. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 53, 134-145.
9. de Graaf, B. & Wertheim, A. H. (1988). The perception of object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: Adjacency is not a factor contributing to the Filehne illusion. Vision Research, 28, 497-502.
10. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
11. von Holst, E. & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464-476.
12. Keck, M. J. & Pentz, B. (1977). Recovery from adaptation to moving gratings. Perception, 6, 719-725.
13. Keller, E. L. & Khan, N. S. (1986). Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey. Vision Research, 26, 943-955.
14. Kimmig, H. G., Miles, F. A. & Schwarz, U. (1992). Effects of stationary textured backgrounds on the initiation of pursuit eye movements in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 68, 2147-2164.
15. Lieberman, H. R. & Pentland, A. P. (1982). Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The best PEST. Behaviour Research Methods and Instruments, 14, 21-25.
16. Mack, A. & Herman, E. (1973). Position constancy during pursuit eye movements: An investigation of the Filehne illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 71-84.
17. Mack, A. & Herman, E. (1978). The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements. Vision Research, 18, 55-62.
18. McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A. & Teller, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 286-298.
19. Mohrmann, H. & Thier, P. (1995). The influence of structured visual backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation, steady state pursuit and smooth-pursuit termination. Biological Cybernetics. In press.
20. Post, R. B. & Leibowitz, H. W. (1985). A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception. Perception, 14, 631-643.
21. Raymond, J. E. & Shapiro, K. L. (1984). Optokinetic backgrounds affect perceived velocity during ocular tracking. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 221-224.
22. Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 43, 482-489.
23. Spigel, I. M. (1962). Contour absence as a critical factor in the inhibition of the decay of the movement after-effect. Journal of Psychology, 50, 221-228.
24. Taylor, M. M. & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 782-787.
25. Verstraten, F. A. J., Fredericksen, R. E., Grüsser, O.-J. & van der Grind, W. A. (1994). Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion. Vision Research, 34, 1149-1155.
26. Wallach, H., Becklen, R. & Nitzberg, D. (1985). The perception of motion during colinear eye movments. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 18-22.
27. Wertheim, A. H. (1981). On the relativity of perceived motion. Acta Psychologyogica, 48, 97-110.
28. Wertheim, A. H. (1987). Retinal and extraretinal information in movement perception: How to invert the Filehne illusion. Perception, 16, 299-308.
29. Wertheim, A. H. (1994). Motion perception during self-motion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 293-355.
30. Wertheim, A. H. & Bekkering, H. (1992). Motion thresholds of briefly visible stimuli increase asymmetrically with age. Vision Research, 32, 2379-2384.
31. Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology Monographs (Suppl. 1).
32. Yee, R. D., Daniels, S. A., Jones, O. W., Baloh, R. W. & Honrubia, V. (1983). Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 24, 1115-1122.