Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for hydrologic modeling

Journal of Hydroinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 282-296

  Mishra, Srikanta ^a  

^a INTERA Incorporated   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrologic; Modeling; Sensitivity; Techniques; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949142997     PISSN: 14647141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2009.048     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ang, A. H.-S. & Tang, W. H. 1984 Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol.II Decision, Risk and Reliability. Wiley, New York.
2. Benjamin, J. R. & Cornell, C. A. 1970 Probability, Statistics and Decisions for Civil Engineers. McGraw Hill, New York.
3. Beven, K.J. & Binley, A. 1992 The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Process. 6, 279-298.
4. Bonnlander, B. V. & Weigend, A. S. 1994 Selecting input variables using mutual information and nonparametric density estimation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ISANN'94), Tainan, Taiwan, pp. 42-50.
5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. & Stone, C. J. 1984 Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
6. Chang, C.-H., Yang, J.-C. & Tung, Y.-K. 1997 Uncertainty analysis by point estimate methods. ASCE J. Hydraul. Eng. 123 (3), 244-250.
7. Dettinger, M. D. & Wilson, J. L. 1981 First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow. Water Resour.Res. 17(1), 149-157.
8. Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. 1981 Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York.
9. EPA 1997 Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis. EPA/630/R-97/001, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
10. Granger, C. W. J. & Lin, J. 1994 Using mutual information to identify lags in nonlinear models. J. Time Ser. Anal. 15, 371-384.
11. Gwo, J. P., Toran, L. E., Morris, M. D. & Wilson, G. V. 1996 Subsurface stormflow modeling with sensitivity analysis using a Latin-hypercube sampling technique. Ground Water 34 (5), 811-818.
12. Hahn, G. J. & Shapiro, S. S. 1967 Statistical Models in Engineering. Wiley, New York.
13. Hamed, M. M., Conte, J. P. & Bedient, P. B. 1995 Probabilistic screening tool for groundwater contamination and risk assessment. ASCE J. Environ. Eng. 121 (11), 767-774.
14. Harr, M. E 1987 Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York.
15. Harr, M. E. 1989 Probabilistic estimates for multivariate analyses. Appl. Math. Model. 13 (5), 313-318.
16. Helton, J. C. 1993 Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 42, 327-373.
17. Iman, R. L. & Conover, W. J. 1982 A distribution free approach to inducing rank correlation among inputs. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 11, 335-360.
18. Iman, R. L. & Helton, J. C. 1985 Investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Risk Anal. 8 (1), 71-90.
19. James, A. L. & Oldenburg, C. M. 1997 Linear and Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis for subsurface multiphase contaminant transport. Water Resour. Res. 33 (11), 2495-2503.
20. Keeny, R. L. & von Winterfeld, D. 1991 Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 38 (3), 191-201.
21. Kessler, J. H. & McGuire, R. M. 1999 Total system performance assessment using a logic tree approach. Risk Anal. 19, 915-932.
22. Madsen, H., Krenk, S. & Lind, N. C. 1986 Methods of Structural Safety. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N J.
23. McKay, M. D., Conover, W. J. & Beckman, R. J. 1979 A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 (3), 239-245.
24. Melching, C. S. 1992 An improved first-order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling. J. Hydrol. 132, 157-177.
25. Mishra, S. 2000 Uncertainty propagation using the point estimate method. In Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modeling: Coping with Uncertainty (ed. F. Stauffer, W. Kinzelbach, K. Kovar & E. Hoehn), pp. 292-296. IAHS Publ. 265, International Association of Hydrological Sciences. Wallingford, UK.
26. Mishra, S. 2002 Assigning Probability Distributions to Input Parameters of Performance Assessment Models. Report SKB- TR-02-11. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm.
27. Mishra, S. 2003 Beyond Monte Carlo simulation-alternative techniques for probabilistic groundwater modeling. In Groundwater Quality Modeling and Management under Uncertainty (ed. S. Mishra), pp. 204-214. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
28. Mishra, S., Deeds, N. E. & RamaRao, B. S. 2003 Application of classification trees in the sensitivity analysis of probabilistic model results. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73, 123-129.
29. Mishra, S. & Freeze, G. A. 1998 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Techniques Applied to the Performance Assessment of the Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste in Japan. Report prepared for Advanced Information Technology, Inc. Tokyo, Japan.
30. Mishra, S. & Knowlton, R. G. 2003 Testing for input-output dependence in performance assessment models. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, Las Vegas, NV. American Nuclear Society, Illinois, USA, pp. 882-887.
31. Mishra, S. & Parker, J. C. 1989 Effects of parameter uncertainty on predictions of unsaturated flow. J. Hydrol. 108, 19-25.
32. Mishra, S., Statham, W. H., Deeds, N. E. & RamaRao, B. S. 2002 Measures of uncertainty importance for Monte Carlo simulation results. In: Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA'02), Detroit, MI. American Nuclear Society, Illinois, USA, pp. 435-442.
33. Morgan, M. G. & Henrion, M. 1990 Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Morris, M. D. 1991 Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33 (2), 161-174.
35. Muleta, M. K. & Nicklow, J. W. 2005 Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. J. Hydrol. 306, 127-145.
36. Neuman, S. P. 2003 Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions. Stochast. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 17 (5), 291-305.
37. Poeter, E. & Anderson, D. 2005 Multimodel ranking and inference in ground water modeling. Ground Water 43 (4), 597-605.
38. Press, W. H., Teukloksky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. 1992 Numerical Recipes in Fortran. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Rama Rao, B. S., Mishra, S. & Andrews, R. W. 1998 Uncertainty importance of correlated variables in a probabilistic performance assessment. In: Proceedings of the SAMO'98, Second International Symposium on Sensitivity Analysis for Model Output, Venice, Italy, 19-22 April. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp. 215-218.
40. Ruskauff, G. J., Mishra, S., Ewing, J. E. & Deeds, N. E. 2006 Local and global sensitivity analysis for a complex flow model. In: Proceedings, MODFLOW and More 2006, Golden, CO.
41. Saltelli, A., Chan, K. & Scott, M. (Eds.) 2000 Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, Chichester
42. Sitar, N., Cawlfield, J. D. & der Kiureghian, A. 1987 First-order reliability approach to stochastic analysis of subsurface flow and solute transport. Water Resour. Res. 23 (5), 794-804.
43. Tung, Y.-K. & Yen, B.-C. 2005 Hydrosystems Engineering Uncertainty Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.
44. Unlu, K., Parker, J. C. & Chong, P. K. 1995 Comparison of three uncertainty analysis methods to assess impacts on groundwater of constituents leached from land-disposed waste. Hydrogeol. J. 3 (2), 4-18.
45. Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 1997 Modem Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York.
46. Xiang, Y. & Mishra, S. 1997 Probabilistic multiphase flow modeling using the limit-state method. Ground Water 35 (5), 820-826.