Changing patterns of governance for Australian universities

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 13-29

  Harman, Kay ^a   Treadgold, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949127721     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360601166786     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amaral, A., and Maassen, P., 2003. “ Preface ”. In The higher education managerial revolution?, Edited by: Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., and Larsen, I. M. xi–xiii. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (AVCC). 2003. Chancellors’ and AVCC statement on university governance Retrieved October 28, 2006 from http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/policies_programs/statements/
3. Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (AVCC). 2005. Room to move, room to excel: Commonwealth and State regulation of universities Retrieved October 28, 2006 from http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/policies_programs/statements
4. Baldridge, V. J., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G. P., and Riley, G. L., 1991. “ Alternative models of governance in higher education ”. In Organization and governance in higher education, (4th ed.), Edited by: Peterson, M. W., 30–45. Boston, MA: Ginn Press.
5. Baird, J., Beyond professionalization: Enhancing the governance culture for Australian university governing boards. Paper presented to 27th EAIR Forum. August28–31, Riga, Latvia.
6. Bennis, W., and Movius, H., 17 March 2006. “ Why Harvard is so hard to lead ”. In Chronicle of Higher Education 17 March, B.20
7. Birnbaum, R., 2003. The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 127 (Fall): 5–22.
8. Business Council of Australia (BCA). 2002. Developing a framework for the financing and governance of Australian universities: A report prepared for the BCA by the Allen Consulting Group Retrieved April 17, 2006 from http://www.gu.edu.au/vc/ate/pdf/bca.pdf
9. Committee of University Chairmen (CUC). 2004. Review of university governance 1997–2000 Retrieved April 12, 2006 from http://www.shef.ac.uk/cuc/
10. Dawkins, J. S., 1988. Higher education: A policy statement, Canberra: AGPS.
11. Dearing Report. Department of Education and Science. 1997. Higher education in the learning society: Main report, London: HMSO.
12. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). 2002. Higher education at the crossroads: An overview paper, Canberra: DEST.
13. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). 2003a. Meeting the challenges: The governance and management of universities, Canberra: DEST.
14. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). 2003b. Our universities: Backing Australia’s future, Canberra: DEST.
15. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). December 2004. Issues paper: Rationalising responsibility for higher education in Australia, December, Canberra: DEST.
16. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). 2005. Building better foundations for higher education in Australia: A discussion about re-aligning Commonwealth–State responsibilities, Canberra: DEST.
17. Dobkin Hall, P., 2003. A history of nonprofit boards in the United States: BoardSource E-Book series Retrieved May 16, 2006 from http://www.boardsource.org
18. Edwards, M., May 2003. Review of New Zealand tertiary education institution governance, May, Wellington: Ministry of Education.
19. Gumport, P. J., 2001. Divided we govern? Peer review Retrieved September 18, 2006 from http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-spo1/pr-spo1feature1.cfm
20. Harman, K. M., 1989. Culture and conflict in academic organisation: Symbolic aspects of university worlds. Journal of Educational Administration, 27(3): 30–54.
21. Healy, G., 2006. Influence in high places hampered by inexperience. Campus Review, 16(6): 1–5. 15 February.
22. Hermalin, B. E., 2002. Boards of trustees in higher education: A research program Ithaca, NY Cornell Higher Education Research Institute. Retrieved April 20, 2006 from http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/conf/chericonf2002.html
23. Hoare Report. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA). 1995. Higher education management review committee: Report of a committee of inquiry, Canberra: AGPS.
24. Illing, D., 20 July 2005. “ Changing role for the chancellor ”. In Australian 20 July, 35–36.
25. Ingram, R. T., 1993. “ Exercising stewardship in times of transition ”. In Governing Public Colleges and Universities: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 3–22. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Jackson, J., and Cowley, J., 2002. Blinking dons or donning blinkers? Fiduciary and common law obligations of members of governing boards of Australian universities. Southern Cross University Law Review, 6: 8–76.
27. Kaplan, G. E., 2002. How academic ships actually navigate, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute.
28. Kaplan, G. E., 2004. Do governance structures matter?. New Directions for Higher Education, 127 (Fall): 23–34.
29. Kay, J., and Silberston, A., 1995. Corporate governance. National Institute Economic Review, 153 (August): 84–98.
30. Kerr, C., 1993. “ Foreword ”. In Governing public colleges and universities: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, xix–xx. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Kezar, A., 2004. What is more important to effective governance: Relationships, trust and leadership, or structures and formal processes?. New Directions for Higher Education, 127(Fall): 35–46.
32. Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration. 2003. Final report: HM Treasury, London: HMSO. Retrieved September 4, 2006 from http://www.lambertreview.org.uk
33. Learmount, S., June 2002. Theorizing corporate governance: New organizational alternatives (Working Paper No. 237), June, Cambridge: Cambridge University. ESRC Centre for Business Research
34. Letza, S., and Sun, X., 2002. Corporate governance: paradigms, dilemmas and beyond. Poznan University of Economics Review, 2(1): 43–63.
35. Lombardi, J. V., Craig, D. D., Capaldi, D., and Gater, D. S., 2004. University organisation, governance and competitiveness: Annual report Retrieved December 12, 2005 from http://thecenter.ufl.edu/UniversityOrganisation.pdf
36. Martin, B., and Etzkowitz, H., 2000. The origin and evolution of the university species. Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 13(3–4): 9–34.
37. Meek, V. L., and Hayden, M., 2005. “ The governance of public universities in Australia: Trends and contemporary issues ”. In Taking public universities seriously, Edited by: Iacobucci, F., and Tuohy, C., 379–401. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38. Middlehurst, R., 2004. Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4) October: 258–279.
39. Moodie, G., 2003. “ Irrelevant counsel ”. In Symposium: The 2003–04 Federal Budget: Australian Review of Public Affairs Retrieved October 3, 2006 from http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2003/06/moodie/html
40. Musselin, C., 2005. “ Change or continuity in higher education governance? ”. In Governing knowledge, Edited by: Bleiklie, I., and Henkel, M., 65–80. Amsterdam: Springer.
41. Neave, G., 2006. Governance, power and coordination. IAU Horizons, 12(1): 4
42. Neave, G., and van Vught, F., 1991. Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe, Oxford: Pergamon.
43. Olsen, J. P., 1988. “ Administrative reform and theories of organization ”. In Organizing governance: Governing organizations, Edited by: Campbell, C., and Peters, B. G., 233–254. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
44. Olsen, J. P., and Gornitzka, A., 2006. Making sense of change in university governance. IAU Horizons, 11(4): 1–11.
45. Paterson, J., June 2001. Corporate governance, the limits of rationality and proceduralisation (Working Paper No. 198), June, Cambridge: Cambridge University. ESRC Centre for Business Research
46. Peters, B. G., 2001. The future of governing, (2nd ed.), Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
47. Phillips, J., Summing up: Where to from here?. Proceedings of 2003 National Conference on University Governance. November15–17, Melbourne. Retrieved October 12, 2006 from http://governance.canberra.edu.au/the.institute/recent-events/uni_governance.html
48. Shattock, M., 2002. Re-balancing modern governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3): 235–244.
49. Sonnenfeld, J. A., 2002. What makes great boards great. Harvard Business Review, 80(9): 106–112.
50. Tierney, W. G., 2003. Introduction. American Behavioural Scientist, 46(7): 859–864.
51. Tierney, W. G., and Minor, J. T., 2003. Challenges for governance: A national report: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis (CHEPA), Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, Rossier School of Education.
52. Wood, F., and Smith, R., 1992. Governing bodies of 26 Australian universities. Journal of Tertiary Education Administration, 4(1): 61–74.