Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of adnexal tumors;Évaluation de la séquence de diffusion pour l'étude des tumeurs annexielles

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 90, Issue 5 C1, 2009, Pages 589-596

  Roussel, A ^a,b   Thomassin Naggara, I ^a   Darai, E ^a   Marsault, C ^a   Bazot, M ^a  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^b SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Adnexal tumor; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion weighted imaging; MRI; Ovarian cancer

Indexed keywords

ADNEXA DISEASE; ANDROBLASTOMA; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BRENNER TUMOR; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; CYSTADENOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; FEMALE; GRANULOSA CELL TUMOR; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY METASTASIS; OVARY TUMOR; PELVIS TUMOR; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; TERATOMA; UTERUS TUMOR; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT TUMOR; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADNEXA UTERI; ADNEXAL DISEASES; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68949105453     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)74025-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, Kinkel K, Yu KK, Sica G, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000;214:39-46.
2. Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1297-304.
3. Kremer S, Oppenheim C, Schmitt E, Dietemann JL. Imagerie de diffusion: principes et applications cliniques. J Ra-diol 2007;88:428-43.
4. Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;217:331-45.
5. Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Takahashi M. Ultrafast MR-imaging of the abdomen: echo planar imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:367-74.
6. Yoshikawa T, Kawamitsu H, Mitchell DG, Ohno Y, Ku Y, Seo Y, et al. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187: 1521-30.
7. La Folie T, Gabaudan C, Triaire B, Ri-chez P, Briant JF. L'IRM corps entier avec séquence de diffusion: technique, intérêts et applications générales. J Radiol 2008;89:603-5.
8. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushi-ma I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:53-60.
9. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai Zl, Gao Yg, An NY, Ma L, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:172-8.
10. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, Daire JL, Fan B, Menu Y. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003;226: 71-8.
11. Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T, Umeoka S, Mikami Y, Fujii S, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26:682-7.
12. Inada Y, Matsuki M, Nakai G, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, et al. Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: Is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging? Eur J Radiol Jan 2008. In press.
13. Shen SH, Chiou YY, Wang JH, Yen MS, Lee RC, Lai CR, et al. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:481-8.
14. Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kigawa J, Sato S, Kanasaki Y, Nakanishi J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:384-9.
15. Zhang Y, Liang BL, Gao L, Ye RX, Shen J, Zhong JL. Diffusion weighted imaging features of normal uterine cervix and cervical carcinoma. Ai Zheng 2007;26: 508-12.
16. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O. Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 2005;15:71-8.
17. McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fy-les A, Haider MA. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1058-64.
18. Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Nishie A, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:271-8.
19. Kier R, Smith RC, McCarthy SM. Value of lipid- and water-suppression MR images in distinguishing between blood and lipid within ovarian masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:321-5.
20. Stevens SK, Hricak H, Campos Z. Teratomas versus cystic hemorrhagic adnexal lesions: differentiation with proton-selective fat-saturation MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:481-8.
21. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, Harada M, Sakamoto Y, Takahashi M, et al. Value of phase-shift gradient-echo MR imaging in the differentiation of pelvic lesions with high signal intensity at T1-weighted imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:759-64.
22. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 2001; 21:475-90.
23. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K, Shibata T, et al. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991;180:73-8.
24. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Talerman A, Dunton C. Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:465-71.
25. Troiano RN, Lazzarini KM, Scoutt LM, Lange RC, Flynn SD, McCarthy S. Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology 1997; 204:795-8.
26. Maldjian JA, Listerud J, Moonis G, Siddiqi F. Computing diffusion rates in T2-dark hematomas and areas of low T2 signal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22: 112-8.
27. Moteki T, Ishizaka H. Evaluation of cystic ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from turbo-FLASH MR images. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:612-20.
28. Moteki T, Ishizaka H. Evaluation of cystic ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from reordered turboflash MR images. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:955-63.
29. Moteki T, Ishizaka H. Diffusion-weighted EPI of cystic ovarian lesions: evaluation of cystic contents using apparent diffusion coefficients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:1014-9.
30. Sarty GE, Kendall EJ, Loewy J, Dhir A, Olatunbosun OA, Pierson RA. Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging of ovarian masses: a first experience with 12 cases. Magma 2004;16:182-93.
31. Kaji Y, Matsuo M, Matsuki M, Yoshida M, Hayashi M, Nanno H, et al. Cystic ovarian lesions in SSFP diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2002;1:183-9.
32. Katayama M, Masui T, Kobayashi S, Ito T, Sakahara H, Nozaki A, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:250-6.
33. Moteki T, Horikoshi H, Endo K. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in endometrial and other pelvic cysts. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:463-70.