Humus conditions of stands with different proportion of Douglas fir in the Hůrky Training Forest District and Kr̊tiny Training Forest Enterprise

Journal of Forest Science

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 345-356

  Mensik L ^a   Kulhavy J ^a   Kantor, P ^a   Remes M ^a  

^a MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

C N ratio; Carbon and nitrogen; DOC; Forest floor reserves; PH; Soil; Species composition

Indexed keywords

FLOORS; NITROGEN; ORGANIC CARBON; PH; SOILS;

C/N RATIO; CARBON AND NITROGEN; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; DIFFERENT PROPORTIONS; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; FOREST FLOORS; SOIL ACIDIFICATIONS; SPECIES COMPOSITION;

FORESTRY;

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; FOREST FLOOR; HUMUS; MESOTROPHIC ENVIRONMENT; SOIL CARBON; SOIL NITROGEN;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

FAGUS; PICEA; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 68949100526     PISSN: 12124834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/9/2009-jfs     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. BERGER T.W., NEUBAUER CH., GLATZEL G., 2002. Factors controlling soil carbon and nitrogen stores in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management, 159: 3-14.
2. BINKLEY D., GIARDINA C, 1998. Why do tree species affects soil? The Warp and Woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry, 42: 89-106.
3. BUŠINA F., 2007. Natural regeneration of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) in forest stands of Training Forest District Hǔrky, Higher Forestry School and Secondary Forestry School in Pisek. Journal of Forest Science, 53: 20-34.
4. COTE L., BROWN S., PARE D., FYLES J., BAUHUS J., 2000. Dynamics of carbon acid nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixed wood. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32:1079-1090.
5. ČERMÁK J., KUČER A J., BAUERLE W, PHILIPS J., HINCKLEY T., 2007. Tree water storage and its diurnal dynamic related to sap flow and changes of trunk volume in old-growth Douglas-fir. Tree Physiology, 27:181-198.
6. EMMETT B.A., BOXMAN D., BREDEMEIER M., GUN-DERSEN P., KJONAAS O.J., MOLDAN F., SCHLEPPI P., TIETEM A A., WRIGHT R.F., 1998. Predicting the effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in conifer stands. Evidence from the NITREX ecosystem scale experiments. Ecosystem, 1: 352-360.
7. GREEN R.N., TROWNBRIDGE R.L., KLINKA K., TOWARDS A., 1993. Taxonomic Classification of Humus Forms. Forest Science Monograph 29, Supplement to Forest Science, 39: 49.
8. HRUŠKA J., CIENCIALA E., 2003. Long-term acidification and nutrient degradation of forest soils - limiting factors of forestry today. Prague, Ministry of Environment CR: 165.
9. KANTOR P., 2008. Production potential of Douglas fir at mesotrophic sites of Kftiny Training Forest Enterprise. Journal of Forest Science, 54: 321-332.
10. KANTOR P., SACH F., 2008. Water balance of young Norway spruce and European beech mountain stands in growing seasons 2005, 2006. Folia Oecologica, 35:6-14.
11. KULHAVY̌ J., 1997. Acidifikace lesních pud jako pudni proces a ekologický faktor. [Habilitačni práce.] Brno, U̇stav ekologie lesa MZLU: 96.
12. LESNÁ J., KULHAVY̌ J., 2003. Evaluation of humus conditions under different forest stands: Beech vs. spruce dominated forest stand. Ekolóia (Bratislava), 22, Supplement 3:47-60.
13. MAGILL A.H., ABER J.D., 2000. Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen relationships in forest litter as affected by nitrogen deposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32: 603-613.
14. MAŘAN B., KÁŠ K., 1948. Biologie lesa I - pedologie a mi-krobiologie lesa. Praha, Melantrich: 573.
15. MICHALZIK B., KALBITZ K., PARK J.H., SOLINGER S., MATZNER E., 2001. Fluxes and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen - a synthesis for temperate forests. Biogeochemistry, 52:173-205.
16. MZE, 2008. Report on the state of forest and forestry in the Czech Republic 2007. Prague, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: 98.
17. NEMEC A., 1928. Studie o humifikaci lesnich pu̇d. Praha, MZe RCS, 38: 239.
18. NĚMEČEK J., MACKǓ J., VOKOUN J., VAVŘlČEK D., NOVÁK P., 2001. Taxonomicky klasifikacnf system pud Cesk6 republiky. Praha, CZU: 79.
19. PASTOR J., ABER D.J., McCLAUGHERTY CH.A., MELILLO M.J., 1984. Aboveground production and N a P cycling along nitrogen mineralization on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology, 65: 256-268.
20. PELlSEK J., 1964. Lesnické pu̇doznalství. Praha, SZN: 568.
21. PLÍVA K., 1987. Typologický klasifikačnf systém ÚHÚL. Brandys nad Labem, UHUL: 52.
22. PRESCOTT C.E., CHAPPELL H.N., VESTERDAL L., 2000. Nitrogen turnover in forest floors of coastal Douglas-fir at sites differing in soil nitrogen capital. Ecology, 81: 1878-1886.
23. PRU̇ŠA E., 2001. Pěstováini lesu̇ na typologických základech. 1. vyd. Kostelec nad Černymi lesy, Lesnická práce: 594.
24. PUHE J., ULRICH B., 2001. Global Climate Change and Human Impacts on Forest Ecosystems. Ecological Studies No. 143. Berlin, Springer: 593.
25. QUITTE E., 1971. Klimatické oblasti Československa. Studia Geographica 16. Brno, GgÚ ČSAV: 73.
26. ROBERTSON G.P., BLEDSOE C.S., COLEMAN D.C., SOL-LINS P. (eds), 1999. Standard Soil Methods for Long-term Ecological Research. New York, Oxford University Press: 462.
27. SAMEC P., FORMÁNEK P., 2007. Mikrobiologie lesních pu̇d. Kostelec nad Černymi lesy, Lesnická práce: 126.
28. nd Ed. London, Academic Press: 352.
29. ŠÁLY R., 1977. Lesnícke pôdoznalectvo. 2. vyd. Zvolen, VŠLD: 380.
30. ŠÁLY R., 1978. Pôda - zaklad Iesnej produkcie. Bratislava, Príroda: 23
31. TRUHLÁŘ J., 1996. Pěstovanf lesu̇ v biologiekém pojetf. Brno, MZLU,ŠLP:117.
32. ULRICH B., 1983. Soil acidity and its relations to acid deposition, in: Effects of accumulation of air pollutants in forest ecosystems. Proceedings of Workshop Held at Göttingen, West Germany 1982. Berlin, Springer: 127-146.
33. ULRICH B., 1989. Effects of acidic precipitation on forest ecosystems in Europe. In: ADRIANO D.C., JOHNSON A.H. (eds), Acidic Precipitation. Vol.2. Biological and Ecological Effects. New York, Springer-Verlag: 189-272.
34. VAN BREEMEN N., FINZI A.C., 1998. Plant-soil interactions. Ecological aspects and evolutionary implications. Biogeochemistry, 42:1-19.
35. VITOUSEK P., GOSZ J.R., GRIER CH.C., MELILLO J.M., REINERS W.A., 1982. A comparative analysis of potential nitrification and nitrate mobility in forest ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 52:155-177.
36. WARING R.H., RUNNING S.W., 1998. Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales. San Diego, London, Academic Press: 370.
37. WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006. IUSS Working Group. 2nd Ed. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome: 128.
38. YANO Y., McDOWELL W.H., ABER J.D., 2000. Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon in forest soil solution and effects of chronic nitrogen deposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32:1743-1751.
39. ZBÍRAL J., HONSA I., MALÝ S., 1997. Analyza pud III. Jed-notné pracovní postupy. Brno, ÚKZÚZ: 150.
40. ZLATNÍK A., 1976. Lesnicka fytocenologie. Praha, SZN: 495.