Differential evolution of advertisement call traits in dart-poison frogs (anura: Dendrobatidae)

Ethology

Volumn 115, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 801-811

  Erdtmann, Luciana ^a,b   Amézquita, Adolfo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^b Insto Nacl Pesquisas da Amazonia   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CALLING BEHAVIOR; CONSPECIFIC; FROG; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PHYLOGENETICS; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; STOCHASTICITY;

ANIMALIA; ANURA; DENDROBATIDAE;

EID: 68949083499     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01673.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amézquita, A., Hödl, W., Lima, A. P., Castellanos, L., Erdtmann, L. K. Araújo, M. C. 2006 : Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system in the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Evolution 60, 1874 1887.
2. Backwell, P. R. Y. Jennions, M. C. 1993 : Mate choice in Hyla ebraccata: sexual selection, mate recognition and signal selection. Anim. Behav. 45, 1248 1250.
3. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001 : Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1129 1140.
4. Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001 : Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination. Ethology 107, 65 84.
5. Bernal, X. E., Rand, A. S. Ryan, M. J. 2006 : Acoustic preferences and localization performance of blood-sucking flies (Corethrella Coquillett) to túngara frog calls. Behav. Ecol. 17, 709 715.
6. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr. Ives, A. R. 2003 : Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717 745.
7. Boul, K. E., Funk, W. C., Darst, C. R., Cannatella, D. C. Ryan, M. J. 2007 : Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. Proc. R. Soc. B. 274, 399 406.
8. Candolin, U. 2003 : The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78, 575 595.
9. Carson, H. L. 2003 : Mate choice theory and the mode of selection in sexual populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6584 6587.
10. Cocroft, R. B. Ryan, M. J. 1995 : Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim. Behav. 49, 283 303.
11. Cocroft, R. B., McDiarmid, R. W., Jaslow, A. P. Ruiz-Carranza, P. M. 1990 : Vocalizations of eight species of Atelopus (Anura: Bufonidae): with comments on communication in this genus. Copeia 1990, 631 643.
12. Dall, S. R. X., Giraldeau, L., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M. Stephens, D. W. 2005 : Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 187 193.
13. Duellman, W. E. Trueb, L. 1994 : Biology of Amphibians, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1985 : Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1 15.
15. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991 : Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42, 615 635.
16. Gerhardt, H. C. 1994 : The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 293 324.
17. Gerhardt, H. C. Huber, F. 2002 : Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
18. Gerhardt, H. C. Klump, G. M. 1988 : Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: a limitation on mate choice. Anim. Behav. 36, 1247 1249.
19. Grant, T., Frost, D. R., Caldwell, J. P., Gagliardo, R., Haddad, C. F. B., Kok, P. J. R., Means, D. B., Noonan, B. P., Schargel, W. E. Wheeler, W. C. 2006 : Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). B. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 299, 1 262.
20. Hansen, T. F. Martins, E. P. 1996 : Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50, 1404 1417.
21. Hansen, T. F. Orzack, S. H. 2005 : Assessing current adaptation and phylogenetic inertia as explanations of trait evolution: the need for controlled comparisons. Evolution 59, 2063 2072.
22. Hebets, E. A. Papaj, D. R. 2005 : Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 197 214.
23. Hödl, W. Amézquita, A. 2001 : Visual Signaling in Anuran Amphibians. In : Anuran Communication, 1rst edn (Ryan, M. J., ed). Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, pp. 121 141.
24. Housworth, E. A., Martins, E. P. Lynch, M. 2004 : The phylogenetic mixed model. Am. Nat. 163, 84 96.
25. Ibáñez, R. D., Rand, A. S., Ryan, M. J. Jaramillo, C. A. A. 1999 : Vocalizations of Frogs and Todas from Barro Colorado Nature Monument, Soberania National Park and Adjacent Areas. Mizracht & Pujol, Panama.
26. Littlejohn, M. J. 1988 : The retrograde evolution of homogamic acoustic signalling systems in hybrid zones. In : The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System (Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M. J., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T. E. Walkowiak, W., eds). John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 613 635.
27. Martins, E. P. 2004 : COMPARE, version 4.6b. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Available at: http://compare.bio. indiana.edu/. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
28. Martins, E. P., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. Housworth, E. A. 2002 : Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative meted: a computer simulation test. Evolution 56, 1 13.
29. Marty, C. Gaucher, P. 1999 : Guide Sonore des Amphibiens de Guyane. Centre Bioacoustique Alpin, Paris.
30. Mayr, E. 1976 : Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussets.
31. McCraken, K. G. Sheldon, F. H. 1997 : Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3833 3836.
32. McLister, J. D., Stevens, E. D. Bogart, J. P. 1995 : Comparative contractile dynamics of calling and locomotor muscles in three hylid frogs. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 1527 1538.
33. Myers, C. W. Daly, J. W. 1980 : Taxonomy and ecology of Dendrobates bombetes, a new Andean poison frog with new skin toxins. Amer. Mus. Novitates 2692, 1 23.
34. Ord, T. J. Martins, E. P. 2006 : Tracing the origins of signal diversity in anole lizards: phylogenetic approaches to inferring the evolution of complex behaviour. Anim. Behav. 71, 1411 1429.
35. Ostrowski, T. Mahn, T. 2005 : Dendrobase.de - eine Online-Datenbank der Familie Dendrobatidae (Anura). Available at: http://www.dendrobase.de.
36. Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. Tregenza, T. 2001 : Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 364 371.
37. Pfennig, K. S. 1998 : The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc. R. Lond. B 265, 1743 1748.
38. Podos, J. 2001 : Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409, 185 188.
39. Revell, L. J., Harmon, L. J. Collar, D. C. 2008 : Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process and rate. Syst. Biol. 57, 591 601.
40. Ruiz-Carranza, P. M. Ramírez-Pinilla, M. P. 1992 : Una nueva especie de Minyobates (Anura: Dendrobatidae) de Colombia. Lozania 61, 1 16.
41. Ryan, M. J. 1988 : Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication. In : The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System (Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M. J., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T. E. Walkowiak, W., eds). John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 637 675.
42. Ryan, M. J. Rand, A. S. 1993 : Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lon. B 340, 187 195.
43. Santos, J. C., Coloma, L. A. Cannatela, D. C. 2003 : Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12792 12797.
44. Seddon, N. 2005 : Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59, 200 215.
45. Sihler, A. Sihler, G. 2006 : AZDR.com Dendrobase Ranch. Available at: http://www.azdr.com.
46. SPSS Inc. 2005 : SPSS Base 11.0 for Macintosh User's Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
47. Streelman, J. T. Danley, P. D. 2003 : The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 126 131.
48. Tuttle, M. D. Ryan, M. J. 1981 : Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the Neotropics. Science 214, 677 678.
49. Wells, K. D. 1977 : The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim. Behav. 25, 666 693.
50. Wilczynski, W. Ryan, M. J. 1999 : Geographic variation in animal communication systems. In : Geographic Variation in Behavior: Perspectives on Evolutionary Mechanisms (Foster, S. A. Endler, J. A., eds). Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 234 261.
51. Wollerman, L. Wiley, H. 2002 : Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of males calls in a Neotropical frog. Anim. Behav. 63, 15 22.
52. Zimmerman, B. L. 1983 : A comparison of structural features of calls of open and forest habitat frog species in the Central Amazon. Herpetologica 39, 235 246.
53. Zimmermann, E. 1990 : Behavioral signals and reproduction modes in neotropical frog family Dendrobatidae. Forts. Zool. 38, 61 73.
54. Zimmermann, H. Zimmermann, E. 1988 : Socialverhalten, Fortpflanzungsverhalten und Zucht der fäberfrösche D. histrionicus und D. lehmanni sowie einiger anderer Dendrobatiden. Zeit. Kölner Zoo. 24, 83 99.