The effect of cryptic female choice on sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 276, Issue 1670, 2009, Pages 3123-3131

  Van Velzen, Ellen ^a   Schärer, Lukas ^b   Pen, Ido ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cryptic female choice; Sex allocation; Simultaneous hermaphroditism; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; CRYPSIS; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; HERMAPHRODITE; HERMAPHRODITISM; MATE CHOICE; SEX ALLOCATION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; EVOLUTION; HERMAPHRODITISM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX ALLOCATION; SPERM; SPERM COMPETITION;

EID: 68849119868     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0566     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arnold, S. J. 1994 Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144, S126-S149. (doi:10.1086/285656)
2. Ball, M. A. & Parker, G. A. 2003 Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females. J. Theor. Biol. 224, 27-42. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00118-8)
3. Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21)
4. Brauer, V. S., Schärer, L. & Michiels, N. K. 2007 Phenotypically flexible sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 61, 216-222. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00018.x)
5. Charlesworth, D. 1984 Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22, 333-348. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01683.x)
6. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1978 Model for evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112, 975-997. (doi:10.1086/283342)
7. Charnov, E. L. 1979 Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 2480-2484. (doi:10.1073/pnas.76.5. 2480)
8. Charnov, E. L. 1982 In The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Charnov, E. L. 1996 Sperm competition and sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Evol. Ecol. 10, 457-462. (doi:10.1007/BF01237878)
10. Charnov, E. L., Smith, J. M. & Bull, J. J. 1976 Why be an hermaphrodite. Nature 263, 125-126. (doi:10.1038/263125a0)
11. Dewsbury, D. A. 2005 The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 831-837. (doi:10.1093/icb/45.5.831)
12. Eberhard, W. G. 1996 Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Geritz, S. A. H., Kisdi, E., Meszena, G. & Metz, J. A. J. 1998 Evolutionarily singular strategies and adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12, 35-37. (doi:10.1023/A: 1006554906681)
14. Ghiselin, M. T. 1969 Evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 44, 189-208. (doi:10.1086/406066)
15. Greeff, J. M. & Michiels, N. K. 1999 Sperm digestion and reciprocal sperm transfer can drive hermaphrodite sex allocation to equality. Am. Nat. 153, 421-430. (doi:10.1086/303184)
16. Greeff, J. M. & Parker, G. A. 2000 Spermicide by females: what should males do? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1759-1763. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1207)
17. Greeff, J. M., Nason, J. D. & Compton, S. G. 2001 Skewed paternity and sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants and animals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2143-2147. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1771)
18. Haase, M. & Karlsson, A. 2004 Mate choice in a hermaphrodite: you won't score with a spermatophore. Anim. Behav. 67, 287-291. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.009)
19. Hamilton, W. D. 1967 Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156, 477-488. (doi:10.1126/science.156.3774.477)
20. Jarne, P. & Auld, J. R. 2006 Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60, 1816-1824.
21. Leonard, J. L. 1990 The hermaphrodite dilemma. J. Theor. Biol. 147, 361-372. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80493-X)
22. Leonard, J. L. 2005 Bateman's principle and simultaneous hermaphrodites: a paradox. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 856-873. (doi:10.1093/icb/45.5. 856)
23. Lloyd, D. G. 1975 Maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45, 325-339. (doi:10.1007/BF01508307)
24. Michiels, N. K. 1998 Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In Sperm competition and sexual selection (eds T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller), pp. 219-254. London, UK: Academic Press.
25. Michiels, N. K. & Bakovski, B. 2000 Sperm trading in a hermaphroditic flatworm: reluctant fathers and sexy mothers. Anim. Behav. 59, 319-325. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1315)
26. Michiels, N. K. & Newman, L. J. 1998 Sex and violence in hermaphrodites. Nature 391, 647. (doi:10.1038/35527)
27. Parker, G. A. 2006 Sexual conflict over mating and fertilisation: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 235-259. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1785)
28. Pen, I. & Weissing, F. J. 1999 Sperm competition and sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites: a new look at Charnov's invariance principle. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 517-525.
29. Pen, I. & Weissing, F. J. 2002 Optimal sex allocation: steps towards a mechanistic theory. In Sex ratios concepts and research methods (ed. I. C. W. Hardy), pp. 26-45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Pitnick, S. & Brown, W. D. 2000 Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice. Evolution 54, 1052-1056.
31. Pongratz, N. & Michiels, N. K. 2003 High multiple paternity and low last-male sperm precedence in a hermaphroditic planarian flatworm: consequences for reciprocity patterns. Mol. Ecol. 12, 1425-1433. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01844.x)
32. Schärer, L. 2009 Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 63, 1377-1405. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00669.x)
33. Schärer, L. & Janicke, T. In press. Sex allocation and sexual conflict in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Biol. Lett. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0100)
34. Schärer, L. & Ladurner, P. 2003 Phenotypically plastic adjustment of sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 935-941. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2323)
35. Sluys, R. 1989 Sperm resorption in triclads (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida). Invert. Reprod. Dev. 15, 89-95.
36. Snyder, B. F. & Gowaty, P. A. 2007 A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61, 2457-2468. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00212.x)
37. Vreys, C. & Michiels, N. K. 1998 Sperm trading by volume in a hermaphroditic flatworm with mutual penis intromission. Anim. Behav. 56, 777-785. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0829)
38. Weeks, S. C., Benvenuto, C. & Reed, S. K. 2006 When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 449-464. (doi:10.1093/icb/icj048)
39. Westheide, W. 1999 Ultrastructure and functional significance of intestinojunctional spermathecae in enchytraeids (Oligochaeta, Annelida). Hydrobiologia 406, 199-211. (doi:10.1023/A:1003753018558)