Effect of priming cooperation or individualism on a collective and interdependent task: Changeover speed in the 4 × 100-meter relay race

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 380-389

  Bry, Clémentine ^a   Meyer, Thierry ^b   Oberlé, Dominique ^b   Gherson, Thibault ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

Collective performance; Implicit coordination; Prime to behavior effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749118823     PISSN: 08952779     EISSN: 15432904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.31.3.380     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Marien, H. (2008). Preparing and motivating behaviour outside of awareness. Science, 319, 1639.
2. Althaus, S.L., & Kim, Y.M. (2006). Priming Effects in Complex Information Environments: Reassessing the Impact of News Discourse on Presidential Approval. The Journal of Politics, 68, 960-976.
3. Banfield, J.F., Pendry, L.F., Mewse, A.J., & Edwards, M.G. (2003). The Effects of an Elderly Stereotype Prime on Reaching and Grasping Actions. Social Cognition, 21, 299-319.
4. Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
5. Bargh, J.A., Gollwitzer, P.M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
6. Bry, C., Follenfant, A., & Meyer, T. (2008). Blonde like me: when self-construals moderate stereotype priming effects on intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 751-757.
7. DeCoster, J., & Claypool, H.M. (2004). A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 2-27.
8. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 865-877.
9. Espinosa, J.A., Lerch, F.J., & Kraut, R.E. (2004). Explicit versus implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. In E. Salas & S.M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 107-129). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Follenfant, A., Légal, J-B., Marie Dit Dinard, F., & Meyer, T. (2005). Effet de l'activation de stéréotypes sur le comportement: une application en contexte sportif.[Effects of stereotype activation on behavior: An application in a sport setting] Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 55, 121-129.
11. Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: The Guildford Press.
12. Higgins, E.T., & Brendl, C.M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some "activation rules" influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218-243.
13. Kay, A.C., & Ross, L. (2003). The perceptual push: The interplay of implicit cues and explicit situational construals on behavioral intentions in the Prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 634-643.
14. Kay, A.C., Wheeler, S.C., Bargh, J.A., & Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83-96.
15. Kühnen, U., & Hannover, B. (2000). Assimilation and contrast in social comparison as a consequence of self-construal activation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 799-811.
16. Reimer, T., Park, E.S., & Hinsz, V.B. (2006). Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: An information-processing perspective for team sports. International Journal of Exercise and Sport Psychology, 4, 376-400.
17. Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C.B. (2008). Team coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163-185.
18. Schubert, T.W., & Häfner, M. (2003). Contrast from social stereotypes in automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 577-584.
19. Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., Van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2003). Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 972-987.
20. Spears, R., Gordjin, E., Dijksterhuis, A., & Stapel, D.A. (2004). Reaction in action: Intergroup contrast in automatic behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 605-616.
21. Srull, T.K., & Wyer, R.S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
22. Stanne, M.B., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 133-154.
23. Todorov, A. (2000). The accessibility and applicability of knowledge: Predicting context effects in national surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 429-451.
24. Utz, S., Ouwerkerk, J.W., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2004). What is smart in social dilemmas: Differential effects of priming competence on cooperation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 317-332.