Science and the death penalty: DNA, innocence, and the debate over capital punishment in the United States

Law and Social Inquiry

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 603-633

  Aronson, Jay D ^a   Cole, Simon A ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749116794     PISSN: 08976546     EISSN: 17474469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01159.x     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Acker, James R. 2009. Actual Innocence: Is Death Different Behavioral Sciences and the Law 27 (3 297 311.
2. American Bar Association. 1997. Recommendation No. 107. Chicago: American Bar Association.
3. Angell, Marcia. 1996. Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case. New York : Norton.
4. Aronson, Jay D. 2007. Genetic Witness: Science, Law, and Controversy in the Making of DNA Profiling. New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers University Press.
5. ASCLAD/LAB. 2005. ASCLD/LAB Limited Scope Interim Inspection Report: Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Forensic Science Central Laboratory. April 9. http://www.dfs.virginia.gov/services/forensicBiology/ externalReviewAuditReport.pdf (accessed February 5, 2009).
6. Bandes, Susan A. 2008. After Innocence: Framing Wrongful Convictions. Utah Law Review, 5. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1034472 (accessed February 20, 2009).
7. Banner, Stuart. 2002. The Death Penalty. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
8. Baumgartner, Frank R., Suzanna L. De Boef Amber E. Boydstun. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discover of Innocence. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
9. Bedau, Hugo Adam. 2004a. Abolishing the Death Penalty in the United States: An Analysis of Institutional Obstacles and Future Prospects. In Capital Punishment: Strategies for Abolition, eds. Peter Hodgkinson William A. Schabas, 186 207. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10. Bedau, Hugo Adam. 2004b. An Abolitionist's Survey of the Death Penalty in America Today. In Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? The Experts from Both Sides Make Their Case, ed. Hugo Adam Bedau Paul G. Cassell, 15 50. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
11. Bedau, Hugo Michael Radelet. 1987. Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases. Stanford Law Review 40 : 21 173.
12. Berger, Margaret A. 2000. Expert Testimony: The Supreme Court's Rules. Issues in Science and Technology 16 (4 57 63.
13. Berman, Douglas A. 2006. Of Innocence and Over-Punishment. In Sentencing Law and Policy. http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing-law-and-policy/2006/01/ of-innocence-an.html (accessed March 6, 2009).
14. Bieber, Frederick. 2005. Ethics, Science and the Law of Capital Punishment. Indiana Law Journal 80 : 69 72.
15. Borchard, Edwin. 1942 [1932]. Convicting the Innocent: Errors of Criminal Justice. Hamden, CT : Archon.
16. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. In The Science Studies Reader, ed. Mario Biagioli, 31 50. New York : Routledge.
17. Butler, John M. 2005. Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers, 2nd ed. New York : Elsevier Academic Press.
18. Bykowicz, Julie. 2008. Sizing Up Wrongful Execution Risk. Baltimore Sun, September 6.
19. Cadiz, Laura. 2004. MD-based DNA Lab Fires Analyst over Falsified Tests. Baltimore Sun, November 18.
20. Clarke, Alan W., Eric Lambert Laurie Anne Whitt. 2000-2001. Executing the Innocent: The Next Step in the Marshall Hypotheses. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 26 : 309 44.
21. Cole, Simon A. 2005. More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 : 985 1078.
22. Cole, Simon A. 2006. Is Fingerprint Identification Valid? Rhetorics of Reliability in Fingerprint Proponents' Discourse. Law and Policy 28 (1 109 35.
23. Cole, Simon A. 2007. Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Thinking about Expert Evidence as Expert Testimony. Villanova Law Review 52 : 803 42.
24. Collins, H. M. 1981. Introduction: Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism. Special Issue: Knowledge and Controversy: Studies of Modern Natural Science. Social Studies of Science 11 (1 3 10.
25. Connors, Edward, Thomas Lundregan, Neal Miller Tom McEwen. 1996. Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial. Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice.
26. Davis, Angela Y. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York : Seven Stories Press.
27. Dent, Rebecca. 2006. The Detection and Characterization of Forensic DNA Profiles Manipulated by the Addition of PCR Amplicon. MA thesis, Centre for Forensic Science, University of Western Australia.
28. Dewan, Shalia K. 2004. In Georgia Case, the Reach of DNA Appeals Is Tested. New York Times, July 19.
29. Dieter, Richard C. 1994. Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the Death Penalty. Death Penalty Information Center, http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/599 (accessed March 6, 2009).
30. Dow, David. 2003. Can There Be a Foolproof Death-Penalty System? Bergen County Record, October 13.
31. Duggan, Erin. 2005. Death Penalty Foes Have Their Say. Albany Times Union, January 26.
32. Edmond, Gary. 2002a. Constructing Miscarriages of Justice: Misunderstanding Scientific Evidence in High Profile Criminal Appeals. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (1 53 89.
33. Edmond, Gary. 2002b. The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 (2 191 226.
34. Erickson, Doug. 2006. Tying DNA to the Needle, Oct. 21. http://www.madison.com/archives/read.php?ref=/wsj/2006/10/22/0610210525.php (accessed October 17, 2008).
35. Forst, Brian. 2004. Errors of Justice: Nature, Sources and Remedies. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
36. Fox, James Alan. 2003. Foolproof or Foolish? Boston Globe, September 28, H11.
37. Friedman, Richard D. 2003. Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture. Seton Hall Law Review 33 : 1047 70.
38. Frontline. 1997 What Jennifer Saw: Barry Scheck Frontline. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/dna/interviews/scheck.html (accessed February 5, 2009).
39. Fuller, Steve. 2006. A Step toward the Legalization of Science Studies. Social Studies of Science 36 (6 827 34.
40. Garrett, Brandon L. 2008. Judging Innocence. Columbia Law Review 108 (1 55 142.
41. Giannelli, Paul. 2007. Wrongful Convictions and Forensic Science: The Need to Regulate Crime Labs. North Carolina Law Review 86 : 163 235.
42. Gigerenzer, Gerd, Zeno Swijtink, Theodore Porter, Lorraine Daston, John Beatty Lorenz Kruger. 1989. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
43. Golan, Tal. 2004. Laws of Men and Laws of Nature. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
44. Goldberg, Steven. 1994. Culture Clash: Law and Science in America. New York : New York University Press.
45. Governor's Council Final Report. 2004. Massachusetts Governor's Council on Capital Punishment. http://www.lawlib.state.ma.us/docs/5-3- 04Governorsreportcapitalpunishment.pdf (accessed March 6, 2009).
46. Gross, Samuel R. Phoebe C. Ellsworth. 2003. Second Thoughts: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty at the Turn of the Century. In Beyond Repair? America's Death Penalty, ed. Stephen P. Garvey, 7 57. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
47. Halfon, Saul. 1998. Collecting, Testing and Convincing: Forensic DNA Experts in the Courts. Social Studies of Science 28 (5-6 801 28.
48. Hall, Bradley R. 2005. From William Henry Furman to Anthony Porter: The Changing Face of the Death Penalty Debate. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 (2 371 80.
49. Hatch, Orrin. 2000. Statement from Hearing on Post-Conviction DNA Testing: When Is Justice Served? United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, June 13.
50. Healy, Patrick D. 2005. Death Penalty Is Blocked by Democrats. New York Times, April 13, B1 B6.
51. Helman, Scott. 2005. Death Penalty Bill Fails in House, Romney Initiative Roundly Defeated. Boston Globe, November 16.
52. Hoffman, Joseph L. 2005. Protecting the Innocent: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 : 561 85.
53. Huber, Peter W. 1991. Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. New York : Basic.
54. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America, Twentieth Century Fund. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
55. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2 328 41.
56. Jordan, Kathleen Michael Lynch. 1998. The Dissemination, Standardization and Routinization of a Molecular Biological Technique. Social Studies of Science 28 (5-6 773 800.
57. Krane, Dan E., Simon Ford, Jason R. Gilder, Keith Inman, Allan Jamieson, Roger Koppl, Irving L. Kornfield, D. Michael Risinger, Norah Rudin, Mark Scott Taylor William C. Thompson. 2008. Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53 (4 1006 07.
58. Kreimer, Seth F. 2005. Truth Machines and Consequences: The Light and Dark Sides of "Accuracy" in Criminal Justice. New York University Annual Survey of American Law 60 : 655 74.
59. Kreimer, Seth F. David Rudovsky. 2002. Double Helix, Double Bind: Factual Innocence and Postconviction DNA Testing. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 : 547 617.
60. Kruger, Lorenz, Lorraine Daston Michael Heidelberger. 1990. The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
61. Latzer. 2003. Reflections on Innocence. Criminal Law Bulletin 39 (2 133 49.
62. Lentol, Joseph, Helene Weinstein Jeffrion Aubry. 2005. The Death Penalty in New York. New York: New York State Assembly.
63. Liebman, James S. 2002. The New Death Penalty Debate: What's DNA Got to Do with It? Columbia Human Rights Law Review 33 : 527 54.
64. Liebman, James S., Jeffrey Fagan Valerie West. 2000. A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995. New York: Columbia University http://www2.law.columbia.edu/instructionalservices/liebman/liebman2.pdf (accessed March 6, 2009).
65. Liptak, Adam. 2007. At 60% of Total, Texas Is Bucking Execution Trend. New York Times, December 26, A1.
66. Loevinger, Lee. 1967. Law and Science as Rival Systems. University of Florida Law Review 19 : 530 51.
67. Lutton, Linda. 2000. The End of Executions? In These Times, October.
68. Lynch, Michael, Simon A. Cole, Ruth McNally Kathleen Jordan. 2008. Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
69. Mandery, Evan J. 2004. Massachusetts and the Changing Debate on the Death Penalty. Criminal Law Bulletin 40 (5 518 22.
70. Markman, Stephen Paul Cassell. 1988. Protecting the Innocent: A Response to the Bedau-Radelet Study. Stanford Law Review 41 : 121 60.
71. Marshall, Lawrence C. 2004. The Innocence Revolution and the Death Penalty. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 : 573 84.
72. Massachusetts Governor's Office. 2003. Romney Takes Scientific Approach to Death Penalty. Press release.
73. Massachusetts Governor's Office. 2005. Relying on Science, Romney Files Death Penalty Bill. Press release.
74. McGlone, Tim. 2006. Nearly 500 Military DNA Cases Under Investigation. Virginian-Pilot, May 17.
75. Mnookin, Jennifer L. 2001. Fingerprint Evidence in an Age of DNA Profiling. Brooklyn Law Review 67 (1 13 70.
76. Murphy, Erin. 2007. The New Forensics: Criminal Justice, False Certainty, and the Second Generation of Scientific Evidence. California Law Review 95 : 721 97.
77. Nowak, Rachel. 2003. Rough Justice. New Scientist. http://www. newscientist.com/article/mg17823985.300-rough-justice.html?full=true (accessed February 5, 2009).
78. Office of the Independent Investigator for the Houston Police Department Crime Laboratory and Property Room. 2006. Independent Investigator Issues Fifth Report on Houston Police Department Crime Lab. May 11. http://www. hpdlabinvestigation.org/pressrelease/060511pressrelease.pdf (accessed November 7, 2008).
79. Pinch, Trevor Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science 14 : 399 441.
80. Pokorak, Jeffrey J. 2005. Unintended Consequences of the Scientific Evidence Requirement. Indiana Law Journal 80 : 75 80.
81. Purnick, Joyce. 2004. Temperature Seems to Cool on Death Law. New York Times, December 20, B1.
82. Radelet, Michael. 2001. The Death Penalty and the Conviction of the Innocent. Paper presented at the Wrongful Convictions: Causes and Remedies conference, Cardozo Law School, March 22, in New York, NY.
83. Radelet, Michael L., Hugo Adam Bedau Constance L. Putnam. 1992. In Spite of Innocence: Erroneous Convictions in Capital Cases. Boston, MA : Northeastern University Press.
84. Radelet, Michael L. Marian J. Borg. 2000. The Changing Nature of Death Penalty Debates. Annual Review of Sociology 26 : 43 61.
85. Raymond, Margaret. 2001. The Problem with Innocence. Cleveland State Law Review 49 : 449 63.
86. Rimer, Sara. 2002. Convict's DNA Sways Labs, Not a Determined Prosecutor. New York Times, February 6, A14.
87. Risinger, D. Michael. 2007. Innocents Convicted: An Empirically Justified Factual Wrongful Conviction Rate. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 97 (3 761 806.
88. Risinger, D. Michael, Michael J. Saks, William C. Thompson Robert Rosenthal. 2002. The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion. California Law Review 90 (1 1 56.
89. Rooney, James P. The Demise of the Scientific Death Penalty. Massachusetts Citizens against the Death Penalty. http://mcadp.org/EndSciDP.html (accessed February 5, 2009).
90. Rosen, Richard A. 2003. Innocence and Death. North Carolina Law Review 82 : 61 113.
91. Rosen, Richard A. 2006. Reflections on Innocence. Wisconsin Law Review 2006 : 237 89.
92. Ruethling, Gretchen. 2005. Illinois State Police Cancels Forensic Lab's Contract, Citing Errors. New York Times, August 20, A8.
93. Saks, Michael J. Jonathan J. Koehler. 2005. The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science. Science 309 : 892 95.
94. Sarat, Austin. 2003. The Future of the Death Penalty. Paper presented at Executing Justice: America and the Death Penalty, April 26, University of California, Santa Barbara.
95. Sarat, Austin. 2006. The Rhetoric of Race in the "New Abolitionism In From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty in America, ed. Charles J. Ogletree, Jr. and Austin Sarat, 260 84. New York : New York University Press.
96. Sarat, Austin Nasser Hussain. 2004. On Lawful Lawlessness: George Ryan, Executive Clemency, and the Rhetoric of Sparing Life. Stanford Law Review 56 (5 1307 44.
97. Scheck, Barry Peter Neufeld. 2002. Toward the Formation of "Innocence Commissions" in America. Judicature 86 : 98 105.
98. Scheck, Barry, Peter Neufeld Jim Dwyer. 2000. Actual Innoncence: Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted. New York : Penguin Putnam, Inc.
99. Scheck, Barry, Peter Neufeld Jim Dwyer. 2001. Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right. New York : Penguin Putnam, Inc.
100. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 2004. Errors in Evidence. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 9.
101. Serrill, Michael. 1985. Cathy and Gary in Medialand. Time, May 27, 66.
102. Shapiro, Barbara J. 1991. Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probably Cause: Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence. Berkeley : University of California Press.
103. Steiker, Carol S. Jordan M. Steiker. 2003. Abolition in Our Times. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 : 323 43.
104. Steiker, Carol S. Jordan M. Steiker. 2005. The Seduction of Innocence: The Attraction and Limitations of the Focus on Innocence in Capital Punishment Law and Advocacy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 : 587 624.
105. Tenner, Edward. 1996. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York : Knopf.
106. Thompson, William C. 2006. Tarnish on the "Gold Standard": Recent Problems in Forensic DNA Testing. The Champion, January/February, 10 16.
107. Thompson, William C. 2008. The Potential for Error in Forensic DNA Testing (and How that Complicates the Use of DNA Databases for Criminal Identification). GeneWatch. http://www.gene-watch.org/genewatch/fullpaper-Bill- Thompson.pdf (accessed February 4, 2009).
108. Thompson, William C., Simon Ford, Travis Doom, Michael Raymer Dan E. Krane. 2003. Evaluating Forensic DNA Evidence: Essential Elements of a Competent Defense Review. Part 1. The Champion, April, 16 25.
109. Tucker, Cynthia. 2002. Promote Use of DNA Tests for All Suspects. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, February 10, E10.
110. US Department of Justice. 2004. The FBI DNA Laboratory, A Review of Protocol and Practice Vulnerabilities. Washington, DC : Office of the Inspector General.
111. Walker, Adrian Doris Sue Wong. 1997. No Death Penalty, By One Vote. Boston Globe, November 7.
112. Warden, Rob. 2005. Wilkie Collins's The Dead Alive: The Novel, the Case, and Wrongful Convictions. Evanston, IL : Northwestern University Press.
113. Warden, Rob. 2006. The Rape that Wasn't: The First DNA Exoneration in Illinois. http://www.law.northwestern.edu/wrongfulconvictions/exonerations/ ilDotsonSummary.html (accessed February 19, 2009).
114. Weir, Bruce S. 2007. The Rarity of DNA Profiles. Annals of Applied Statistics 1 (2 358 70.
115. Weisberg, Robert. 2005. The Death Penalty Meets Social Science: Deterrence and Jury Behavior Under New Scrutiny. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 : 151 70.
116. Zerwick, Phoebe. 2005. Mixed Results: Forensics, Right or Wrong, Often Impresses Jurors. Winston-Salem Journal, August 29.
117. Zimring, Franklin E. 2003. The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
118. Zimring, Franklin E. 2005. Symbol and Substance in the Massachusetts Commission Report. Indiana Law Journal 80 : 115 29.
119. Furman v. Georgia, 1 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
120. Gregg v. Georgia, 429 U.S. 153 (1976).
121. Herrera v. Collins, 1506 U.S. 390 (1993).
122. Kansas v. Marsh, 126 S. Ct. 2516 (2006).
123. McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
124. United States v. Quinones [2002a], 205 F. Supp. 2d 256 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
125. United States v. Quinones [2002b], 196 F. Supp. 2d 416 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
126. Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 - (April 24, 1996).