Modeling information quality risk for data mining in data warehouses

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 332-350

  Su, Ying ^a   Peng, Jie ^b   Jin, Zhanming ^c  

^a Tsinghua University   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA   (China)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Data mining (dm); Data warehouse; Information quality; Quality risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749116367     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: 15497860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030902761411     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ballou DP and Pazer HL. 1985. Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems. Manage Sci 31(2):150
2. Ballou DP and Tayi GK. 1999. Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments. Assoc Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 42(1):73-8
3. Ballou D, Madnick S, and Wang R. 2003. Special section: Assuring information quality. J Manage Information Systems 20(3):9-11
4. Bose I and Mahapatra RK. (2001. Business data mining-A machine learning perspective. Information Manage 39(3):211-25
5. Chen SY and Liu XH. 2004. The contribution of data mining to information science. J Information Sci 30(6):550-8
6. Compieta P, Di Martino S, Bertolotto M, et al. 2007. Exploratory spatio-temporal data mining and visualization. J Visual Languages Computing 18(3):255-79
7. DeLone WH and McLean ER. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J Manage Information Systems 19(4):9-30
8. English LP. 1999. Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality Methods for Reducing Costs and Increasing Profits. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA
9. Eppler MJ. 2003. Managing Information Quality Increasing the Value of Information in Knowledge-Intensive Products and Processes. Springer, Berlin, Germany
10. Feltham GA. 1972. Information evaluation. Studies in Accounting Res 5:36-8. American Accounting Assoc, Sarasota, FL, USA
11. Fisher CW, Chengalur-Smith I, and BallouDP. 2003. The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Information Systems Res 14(2):170-88
12. Goodhue DL. 1995. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci 41(12):1827
13. Huang K-T, Lee YW, and Wang RY. 1999. Quality Information and Knowledge. Prentice Hall Publishers, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
14. Kim W, Choi BJ, Hong EK, et al. 2003. A taxonomy of dirty data. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 7(1):81-99
15. Loshin D. 2001. Enterprise Knowledge Management: the Data Quality Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego, CA, USA
16. Madhok V. 2000. Ensuring data quality for data mining-A case study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Quality (MIT IQ Conference). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
17. Mitra P and Chaudhuri C. 2006. Efficient algorithm for the extraction of association rules in data mining. Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA 2006 (Pt 2): 3981: 1-10
18. Mohamadi H, Habibi J, Abadeh MS, et al. 2008. Datamining with a simulated annealing based fuzzy classification system. Pattern Recognition 41(5):1824-33
19. Motro A and Rakov I. 1996. Estimating the quality of data in relational databases. Paper presented at the 1996 Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, USA, October 25-26
20. Nicolaou AI andMcKnightDH. 2006. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Res 17(4):332-51
21. Rieh SY and Belkin NJ. 2002. Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. J Am Soc Information Sci 53(2):145-61
22. Sen A and Sinha AP. 2007. Toward developing data warehousing process standards: An ontology-based review of existing methodologies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Part C-Applications and Reviews 37(1):17-31
23. Sen A, Sinha AP, and Ramamurthy K. 2006. Data warehousing process maturity: An exploratory study of factors influencing user perceptions. IEEE Transactions Engineering Manage 53(3):440-55
24. Shao T and Krishnamurty S. 2008. A clustering-based surrogate model updating approach to simulation-based engineering design. J Mechanical Design 130(4):041101-1-13
25. Snavely H. 1967. Accounting information criteria. The Accounting Rev 42(2):223-32
26. Su Y and Jin Z. 2006. A methodology for information quality assessment in the designing and manufacturing process of mechanical products. In: Al-Hakim L (ed), Information Quality Management: Theory and Applications. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA, pp. 190-22
27. Taylor RS. 1986. Value-Added Processes in Information Systems. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, USA
28. Wand Y and Wang RY. 1996. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. association for computing machinery. Communications of the ACM 39(11):86-95
29. Wang RY and Strong DM. 1996. Beyond accuracy:What data qualitymeans to data consumers. J Manage Information Systems 12(4):5
30. Zhu X and Gauch S. 2000. Incorporating quality metrics in centralized distributed information retrieval on the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Athens, Greece, July 24-28
31. Zmud RW. 1978. An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decision Sci 9(2):187-95