Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of dihydromyrcenol in rats

International Journal of Toxicology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 80-87

  Politano, Valerie T ^a,b,c   Lewis, Elise M ^a,b,c   Hoberman, Alan M ^a,b,c   Christian, Mildred S ^a,b,c   Diener, Robert M ^a,b,c   Api, Anne Marie ^a,b,c  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS   (United States)

^b CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c Argus International Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

CAS 18479 58 8; CAS 25279 09 8; Developmental toxicity; Dihydromyrcenol; Fragrance

Indexed keywords

CORN OIL; DIHYDROMYRCENOL; DRUG ADDITIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BODY WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; FOOD INTAKE; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; RAT; RIB; SOFT TISSUE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VERTEBRA; WEIGHT GAIN;

ABNORMALITIES, DRUG-INDUCED; ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; FETUS; MALE; MONOTERPENES; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; OCTANOLS; PERFUME; PREGNANCY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

RATTUS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 68649113526     PISSN: 10915818     EISSN: 1092874X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1091581809333892     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. International Fragrance Association (IFRA). 2004 Volume of Use Survey. www.ifraorg.org.
2. International Fragrance Association (IFRA). 2007 Fragrance Use Level Survey. www.ifraorg.org.
3. Ford RA, Domeyer B, Easterday O, Maier K, Middleton J. Criteria for development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000;31(pt 1):166-181.
4. Cadby PA, Troy WR, Vey MG. Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: providing estimates for safety evaluation. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002;36:246-252.
5. Bhatia SP, Lalko J, Brain KR, Green DM, Api AM. In vitro human skin penetration of the fragrance material Dimyrcetol®. Presented at: 29th Annual Meeting of the American College of Toxicology; November 9-12, 2008; Tucson, AZ.
6. McGinty D, Letizia CS, Api AM. Fragrance material review on dihydromyrcenol. Food Chem Toxicol. Submitted for publication.
7. Bickers D, Calow P, Greim H, et al. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of alcohols branched chain unsaturated when used as fragrance ingredients. Food Chem Toxicol. Submitted for publication.
8. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM). Acute Oral Toxicity With Dimyrcetol in Rats. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: RIFM; 1975. Unpublished report from Symrise GmbH & Co. KG, report number 54837.
9. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM). Acute Toxicity Study in Rats, Rabbits and Guinea Pigs. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: RIFM; 1977. RIFM report number 1695.
10. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM). Dimyrcetol: Ninety Day Repeated Dose Oral (Gavage) Toxicity Study in the Rat. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: RIFM; 2007. RIFM report number 52794.
11. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM). Reverse Mutation Assay (Ames-Test) With Dimyrcetol in Salmonella Typhimurium/Mammalian Microsome Reverse Mutation Assay. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: RIFM; 2000. Unpublished report from Symrise GmbH & Co. KG, report number 54843.
12. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). International Conference on Harmonization: Guideline on Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Medicinal Products. Rockville, MD: US FDA; 1994.
13. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Good Laboratory Practice Regulations: Final Rule. Rockville, MD: US FDA; 1987. 21 CFR part 58.
14. Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). Good Laboratory Practice Standard for Safety Studies on Drugs. Tokyo: MHW; 1997. MHW Ordinance Number 21, March 26, 1997.
15. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The Revised OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practices. Paris: OECD; 1998. C(97)186/ Final.
16. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
17. Wilson JG. Methods for administering agents and detecting malformations inexperimental animals. In: Wilson JG, Warkany J, eds. Teratology: Principles and Techniques. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1965:262-277.
18. Staples RE. Detection of visceral alterations in mammalian fetuses. Teratology. 1974;9(3):A37-A38.
19. Staples RE, Schnell VL. Refinements in rapid clearing technique in the KOH-alizarin red S method for fetal bone. Stain Technol. 1964;39:61-63.
20. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1967.
21. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. San Francisco, CA: Freeman; 1969.
22. Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096-1121.
23. Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics. 1964;6:241-252.
24. Siegel S. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1956.
25. Poet TS. Assessing dermal absorption. Toxicol Sci. 2000;58:1-2.
26. Khera KS. Common fetal aberrations and their teratolo-gic significance: a review. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1981;1:13-18.
27. Wickramaratne GA. The post-natal fate of supernumerary ribs in rat teratogenicity studies. J Appl Toxicol. 1988;8(2):91-94.
28. Wickramaratne GA, de S. Killick ME, Appleby H. Supernumerary ribs: a transient developmental defect in the rat. In: Greenhalgh R, Roberts TR, eds. Pesticide Science and Biotechnology. London, England: Blackwell Scientific; 1988:557-559.
29. Collins TF, Welsh JJ, Black TN, Whitby KE, O'Donnell MW Jr. Potential reversibility of skeletal effects in rats exposed in utero to caffeine. Food Chem Toxicol. 1987;25:647-662.