Syntactic pattern matching with GraphSpider and MPL

3rd International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine, SMBM 2008 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 129-132

  Clegg, Andrew B ^a   Shepherd, Adrian J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; HIGH PRECISION; MATCHING ENGINES; META PATTERN; PART OF SPEECH; PATTERN SET; SOURCEFORGE; SUBGRAPHS; SYNTACTIC PATTERNS;

PATTERN MATCHING; SEMANTICS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 68649094880     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Alan R Aronson. 2001. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, pages 17-21. Hanley and Belfus, Inc.
2. Oliver Christ. 1994. A modular and flexible architecture for an integrated corpus query system. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Computational Lexicography and Text Research (COMPLEX '94), pages 23-32, Budapest.
3. Andrew B. Clegg. 2008. Computational-Linguistic Approaches to Biological Text Mining. PhD thesis, Birkbeck, London.
4. Hamish Cunningham, Diana Maynard, Kalina Bontcheva, Valentin Tablan, Cristian Ursu, Marin Dimitrov, Mike Dowman, Niraj Aswani, Ian Roberts, Yaoyong Li, and Andrey Shafirin. 2007. Developing Language Processing Components with GATE Version 4 (a User Guide). The University of Sheffield, http://www.gate.ac. uk/.
5. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2006), Genoa, Italy, May.
6. Christine Doran, Michael Niv, Breck Baldwin, Jeffrey Reynar, and B. Srinivas. 1996. Mother of Perl: A multi-tier pattern description language. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Jenny Finkel, Shipra Dingare, Hoy Nguyen, Malvina Nissim, Christopher Manning, and Gail Sinclair. 2004. Exploiting context for biomedical entity recognition: From syntax to the web. In Nigel Collier, Patrick Ruch, and Adeline Nazarenko, editors, Proceedings of the International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications (JNLPBA), pages 88-91, Geneva, Switzerland, August 28-29.
8. Claire Grover, Mirella Lapata, and Alex Lascarides. 2005. A comparison of parsing technologies for the biomedical domain. Natural Language Engineering, 11(1):27-65.
9. Seth Kulick, Ann Bies, Mark Liberman, Mark Mandel, Ryan McDonald, Martha Palmer, Andrew Schein, Lyle Ungar, Scott Winters, and Pete White. 2004. Integrated annotation for biomedical information extraction. In Lynette Hirschman and James Pustejovsky, editors, HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: BioLINK 2004, Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases, pages 61-68, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, May 6. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Roger Levy and Galen Andrew. 2006. Tregex and Tsurgeon: tools for querying and manipulating tree data structures. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2006), Genoa, Italy, May.
11. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1994. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
12. Jiří Mírovský. 2008. Netgraph - making searching in treebanks easy. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP 2008), pages 945-950, Hyderabad, India, January.
13. Claire Nédellec. 2005. Learning Language in Logic - Genic Interaction Extraction Challenge. In Proceedings of Learning Language in Logic (LLL05), Bonn, Germany, August.
14. Sampo Pyysalo, Filip Ginter, Juho Heimonen, Jari Björne, Jorma Boberg, Jouni Järvinen, and Tapio Salakoski. 2007a. BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(50), February.
15. Sampo Pyysalo, Filip Ginter, Veronika Laippala, Katri Haverinen, Juho Heimonen, and Tapio Salakoski. 2007b. On the unification of syntactic annotations under the Stanford dependency scheme: A case study on BioInfer and GENIA. In Proceedings of the Workshop on BioNLP 2007: Biological, translational, and clinical language processing, pages 25-32, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Sebastian Riedel and Ewan Klein. 2005. Genic interaction extraction with semantic and syntactic chains. In Proceedings of Learning Language in Logic (LLL05), Bonn, Germany, August.
17. Fabio Rinaldi, Gerold Schneider, Kaarel Kaljurand, Michael Hess, and Martin Romacker. 2006. An environment for relation mining over richly annotated corpora: the case of GENIA. BMC Bioinformatics, 7 (Suppl 3)(S3), November.
18. Barbara Rosario and Marti Hearst. 2004. Classifying semantic relations in bioscience texts. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'04), Main Volume, pages 430-437, Barcelona, Spain, July.
19. Zhongmin Shi, Baohua Gu, Fred Popowich, and Anoop Sarkar. 2005. Synonym-based query expansion and boosting-based re-ranking: A two-phase approach for genomic information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2005), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November.
20. Yuka Tateisi, Akane Yakushiji, Tomoko Ohta, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Syntax annotation for the GENIA corpus. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing 2005, Companion volume, pages 222-227, Jeju Island, Korea, October.
21. Akane Yakushiji, Yuka Tateisi, Yusuke Miyao, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2001. Event extraction from biomedical papers using a full parser. In Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pages 384-395. World Scientific Publishing.