Implementing digital technology to enhance student learning of pathology

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 172-178

  Farah, C S ^a   Maybury, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Constructivist pedagogy; Dental curriculum; Dental education; E learning; Electracy; Systemic pathology; Virtual microscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CURRICULUM; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, DENTAL; HUMANS; LEARNING; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; QUEENSLAND; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 68649089955     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00570.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brown L, Mehra S, Rattan R, Thomas G. Comparing lecture and e-learning as pedagogies for new and experienced professionals in dentistry. Br Dent J 2004: 197: 95-97.
2. Blake CA, Lavoie HA, Millette CF. Teaching medical histology at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine: transition to virtual slides and virtual microscopes. Anat Rec B New Anat 2003: 275: 196-206.
3. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage, 1994.
4. Aperio Technologies. http://www.aperio.com. [Accessed: November 29, 2008].
5. Kumar RK, Velan GM, Korell SO, Kandara M, Dee FR, Wakefield D. Virtual microscopy for learning and assessment in pathology. J Pathol 2004: 204: 613-618.
6. Ulmer GL. Heuretics: the logic of invention. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
7. Ulmer GL. Internet invention: from literacy to electracy. Boston: Longman, 2003.
8. Chickering AW, Gamson ZF. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bull 1987: 39: 3-7.
9. Biggs J. Teaching for quality at university: what the student does. 2nd edn. Maidenhead, Berkshire: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, 2003.
10. Marton F, Saljo R. Approaches to learning. In: Marton F, Hounsell D, Entwistle N, eds The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984: 36-55.
11. Gibbs D, Gosper M. The upside-down-world of e-learning. J Learn Des 2006: 1: 46-54.
12. Laurillard D. Learning from problem solving. In: Marton F, Houn- sell D, Entwistle N, eds The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984: 124-143.
13. Boshuizen HPA, van de Wiel MWJ. Using multiple representations in medicine: how students struggle with them. In: van Someron MW, Reimann P, Boshuizen HPA, de Jong T, eds Learning with multiple representations. Oxford: Elsivier Science, 1998: 237-262.
14. Kress GR. Multimodality. In: Cope B, Kalantzis M, New London Group, eds. Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. London & New York: Routledge, 2000: 182-202.
15. Kress GR, Van Leeuwen T. Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London & New York: Arnold & Oxford University Press, 2001.