Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue SPEC. ISS. A, 2009, Pages

  Godoy, Franklin Garcia ^a   Godoy, Alexander Garcia ^a   Godoy, Cristina Garcia ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; ARGININE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM CARBONATE; CREST REGULAR DENTIFRICE; DENTAL ALLOY; DISPERSALLOY; FILTEK SUPREME; FLUORIDE SODIUM; GOLD ALLOY; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; TOOTHPASTE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DRUG COMBINATION; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ARGININE; CALCIUM CARBONATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DRUG COMBINATIONS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MATERIALS TESTING; SILICON DIOXIDE; SODIUM FLUORIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTHBRUSHING; TOOTHPASTE;

EID: 68649083247     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kanter J, Koski RE, Martin D. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:505-5l3.
2. Ehmford L. Surface microstructure of composite resins after toothbrush- dentifrice abrasion. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;41:241-245.
3. Aker JR. New composite resins: Comparison of their resistance to toothbrush abrasion and characteristics of abraded surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 105:633-635.
4. oldstein OR, Turner T. The effect of toothbrushing on a hybrid composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:498-500.
5. Neme AL, Wagner WC, Pink FE, Frazier KB. The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes and toothbrushing on the surface roughness of resin composite materials in vitro. Oper Dent 2003;28:808-815.
6. Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ, Coury TL. Effect of equivalent grit sizes utilizing different polishing motions on selected restorative materials.Quintessence list 1996;27:279-285.
7. Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin N Am 1989;33:305-318.
8. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composites surfaces after various finishing procedures. Oral Health 1975;65:29-33.
9. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra-and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:l-14.
10. Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:461-469.
11. Brambilla E, Cagetti MV, Gagliani M, Fadini L, Garcia-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent 2005;18: 173-176.
12. Carlén A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofllm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001;22:481-487.
13. Steinberg D, Eyal S. Early formation of Streptococcus sobrinus on various dental restorative materials. J Dent 2002;30:47-51.
14. Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss El. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface topography of resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:732-736.