Communication research and the study of surveillance

Communication Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 277-293

  Gates, Kelly ^a   Magnet, Shoshana ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68549127380     PISSN: 10714421     EISSN: 15477487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10714420701715357     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Andrejevic, M., 2002a. The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19: 230–248.
2. Andrejevic, M., 2002b. The kinder, gentler gaze of Big Brother: Reality TV in the era of digital capitalism. New Media and Society, 4: 251–270.
3. Andrejevic, M., 2003. Reality TV: The work of being watched, Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
4. Andrejevic, M., 2007. iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
5. Bannister, J., Fyfe, N. R., and Kearns, A., 1998. “ Closed circuit television and the city ”. In Surveillance, closed circuit television and social control, Edited by: Norris, C., Moran, J., and Armstrong, G., 21–40. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
6. Baudrillard, J., 1980. “ The implosion of meaning in the media and the implosion of social in the masses ”. In The myths of information: Technology and postindustrial culture, Edited by: Woodward, K., Madison, WI: Coda Press.
7. Campbell, J., and Carlson, M., 2002. Panopticon.com: Online surveillance and the commodification of privacy. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46: 586–606.
8. Caplan, J., 2001. “This or that particular person”: Protocols of identification in nineteenth-century Europe ”. In Documenting individual identity, Edited by: Caplan, J., and Torpey, J., 49–66. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Caplan, J., and Torpey, J., eds. 2001. Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Carey, J., 1989. Communication as culture: Essays on media and society, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
11. Carlson, M., 2006. Tapping into TiVo: Digital video recorders and the transition from schedules to surveillance in television. New Media and Society, 8: 97–115.
12. Clarke, R., 1994. The digital persona and its application to data surveillance. Information Society, 10: 77–91.
13. Davis, M., 1992. City of quartz, New York: Vintage Books.
14. Doyle, A., 2006. “ An alternative current in surveillance and control: Broadcasting surveillance footage of crimes ”. In The new politics of surveillance and visibility, Edited by: Haggerty, K., and Ericson, R., 199–224. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
15. Dubrofsky, R. E., 2007. Therapeutics of the self: Surveillance in the service of the therapeutic. Television and New Media, 8: 263–284.
16. Elmer, G., 2004. Profiling machines: Mapping the personal information economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Ericson, R. V., and Haggerty, K. D., 1997. Policing the risk society, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18. Foucault, M., 1997. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, New York: Vintage Books. (A. Sheridan, trans.).
19. Gandy, O. H., Jr. 1993. The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal information, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. Giddens, A., 1987. The nation-state and violence: Volume two of a contemporary critique of historical materialism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Graham, S., 1998. “ Towards a fifth utility? On the extension and normalisation of public CCTV ”. In Surveillance, closed circuit television and social control, Edited by: Norris, C., Moran, J., and Armstrong, G., 89–112. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
22. Groombridge, N., 2002. Crime control or crime culture TV?. Surveillance and Society, 1: 30–43.
23. Haggerty, K., and Ericson, R., 2006. The new politics of surveillance and visibility, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
24. Huey, L., Walby, K., and Doyle, A., 2006. “ Cop watching in the downtown eastside: Exploring the use of (counter) surveillance as a tool of resistance ”. In Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life, Edited by: Monahan, T., 149–166. New York: Routledge.
25. Innis, H. A., 1951. The bias of communication, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
26. Jamieson, D., 2006. “ Speaker of the house: When these cameras don't like what they see, they let you know about it ”. In The District Line Washington, DC
27. Lalvani, S., 1996. Photography, vision, and the production of modern bodies, Albany: State University of New York Press.
28. Laudon, K. C., 1986. Dossier society: Value choices in the design of national information systems, New York: Columbia University Press.
29. Levin, T. Y., 2002. “ Rhetoric of the temporal index: Surveillant narration and the cinema of “real time.”. In CTRL [SPACE ]: Rhetorics of surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, Edited by: Levin, T. Y., Frohne, U., and Weibel, P., 578–593. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Lyon, D., 2001. Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
31. Lyon, D., 2006. “ 9/11, Synopticon, and scopophilia: Watching and being watched ”. In The new politics of surveillance and visibility, Edited by: Haggerty, K., and Ericson, R., 35–54. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
32. Lyon, D., 2007. Surveillance studies: An overview, Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Manning, P. K., 1992. Information technologies and the police. Crime and Justice, 15: 349–398.
34. Marx, G., 1988. Undercover: Police surveillance in America, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35. Marx, G., 1996. “ Electronic eye in the sky: Some reflections on the new surveillance and popular culture ”. In Computers, surveillance, and privacy, Edited by: Lyon, D., and Zureik, E., 193–236. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36. Mathiesen, T., 1997. The viewer society: Michel Foucault's “panopticon” revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1: 215–234.
37. Maxwell, R., 2005. Surveillance: Work, myth, and policy. Social Text, 83: 1–19.
38. McCahill, M., 2002. The surveillance web: The rise of visual surveillance in an English city, Portland, OR: Willan.
39. McCarthy, A., 2001. Ambient television: Visual culture and public space, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
40. Meehan, E., 1990. “ Why we don't count: The commodity audience ”. In Logics of television, Edited by: Mellencamp, P., 117–137. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
41. Monahan, T., 2006. “ Questioning surveillance and security ”. In Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life, Edited by: Monahan, T., 1–26. New York: Routledge.
42. Mueller, M., 2004. Ruling the root, Cambridge: MIT Press.
43. Niccol, A., 1997. GATTACA, United States: Columbia Pictures. [Motion picture]
44. Norris, C., Moran, J., and Armstrong, G., eds. 1998. Surveillance, closed circuit television and social control, Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
45. Oullette, L., and Murray, S., 2004. “ Introduction ”. In Reality TV: Remaking television culture, Edited by: Murray, S., and Oullette, L., 1–15. New York: New York University Press.
46. Packer, J., 2006. “ Rethinking dependency: New relations of transportation and communication ”. In Thinking with James Carey: Essays on communications, transportation, history, Edited by: Packer, J., and Robertson, C., 79–100. New York: Peter Lang.
47. Phillips, D., 2004. Privacy policy and PETs. New Media and Society, 6: 691–706.
48. Rapping, E., 2004. “ The changing face of criminal violence on TV ”. In Reality TV: Remaking television culture, Edited by: Murray, S., and Oullette, L., 214–230. New York: New York University Press.
49. Reeves, J. L., and Campbell, R., 1994. Cracked coverage: Television news, the anti-cocaine crusade, and the Reagan legacy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50. Robins, K., and Webster, F., 1999. Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life, New York: Routledge.
51. Rule, J. R., 1973. Private lives and public surveillance, London: Allen Lane.
52. Schiller, D., 2007. How to think about information, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
53. Scott, J. C., 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain scheme to improve the human condition have failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54. Sekula, A., 1986. The body and the archive. October, 39: 3–64.
55. Spielberg, S., 2002. Minority Report, United States: Twentieth Century Fox and Dreamworks. [Motion picture].
56. Sullivan, B. (2007 August 14). High-tech abuse worse than ever. MSNBC.com. http://redtape.msnbc.com/2007/08/leah-lived-for.html (Accessed: 15 August 2007).
57. Tagg, J., 1987. The burden of representation, London: MacMillan.
58. Tinic, S., 2006. “ (En)visioning the television audience: Revisiting question of power in the age of interactive television ”. In The new politics of surveillance and visibility, Edited by: Haggerty, K., and Ericson, R., 308–326. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
59. Turow, J., 1997. Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Turow, J., 2006. Niche envy: Marketing discrimination in the digital age, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Williams, R., 1975. Television: Technology and cultural form, New York: Schocken Books.
62. Yesil, B., 2006. Watching ourselves: Video surveillance, urban space, and self-responsibilization. Cultural Studies, 20: 400–416.