(En)visioning the televisual audience: Revisiting questions of power in the age of interactive television

The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 308-326

  Tinic, Serra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967268266     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Ang, L.1996.’Living Room Wars: Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World. London: Routledge.
2. Barnouw, E. 1978. The Sponsor: Notes on a Modern Potentate. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Barthold, J. 2001. ‘Someone to Watch over You.’ Telephony. 16 Apr 83.
4. Behrens, S. 1998. ‘We’ll Look Back on This Old Barney: An Early Input-Output Gizmo You Could Hug.’ Current Online. 19 Jan. http://www.current.org/tech/tech801b.html (accessed 19 May 2003).
5. Benner, J. 2001. ‘Beware the Eye in ITV.’ Wired News. 26 June. http://www wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,44801,00.html (accessed 3 March 2003).
6. ‘Britney Rules.’ 2002. Victoria Times Colonist. 5 Feb.: D5.
7. Burke, D. 2000. Spy TV: Just Who is the Digital TV Revolution Overthrowing? London: Slab-O-Concrete Publications.
8. Carey, J. 1989. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
9. Cooper, J. 2000. ‘Inside the Box.’ Brandweek. 8 May: C32
10. EPIC. 2001. ‘Report Examines Interactive TV and Privacy.’ EPIC Alert.29 June. Washington: Author.
11. Ford, B. 2000. ‘CBS, Microsoft Ink Interactive Pact.’Ecommerce Times.8 Se+pt. http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/4236.html (accessed 19 May 2003).
12. Gandy Jr, O.1993.The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information Boulder, CO. Westview Press.
13. Howe, J. 2001. ‘Private Viewing.’ MediaWeek. 9 Sept. 11(33). IQ12.
14. Kim, P. 2001. ‘New Media, Old Ideas: The Organizing Ideology of Interactive TVJournal
15. Lyon, D. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. McAllister, M., and J. Turow. 2002. ‘New Media and the Commercial Sphere: Two Intersecting Trends, Five Categories of Concern.’`Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46 (4). 505-14.
17. Negroponte, N. 1995. Being Digital. New York: Vintage.
18. O’Leary, N. 2000. ‘Smart TV.’ Print 54 (6): 132-5.
19. Roman, K. 2002. ‘Future TV Ottawa Citizen.23 May: F`2.
20. Simitis, S. 1987. ‘Reviewing Privacy in an Information Society Pennsylvania Law Review`135:706-16.
21. Smallman, J. 2002. The Medium May Kill the Message.’ Financial Post. 8 Sept.: FP12.
22. Stewart, J. 1999. ‘Interactive Television at Home: Television Meets the Internet.’ In J. Jensen and C. Toscan eds., Interactive Television: TV of the Future or the Future of TV?, 231-68. Denmark: Aalborg University Press.
23. Stipp, H. 1998. ‘Should TV Marry PC?’ American Demographics 20 (7): 16-21.
24. Swann, P. 2000.VdotCom: The Future of Interactive Televisio ew York: TV Books. Nd
25. J. Jensen. 1999. ‘Introduction.’ In J. Jensen and C. Toscan, eds Interactive Television: TV of the Future or the Future of TV,`11-23 Denmar`k: Aalborg University Press.
26. Turow, J. 1997. Breaking Up America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Vikhman, R 2002. ‘Making Thieves’ Out of TV Viewers: The Fight over DVRs Reaches the Courts.’ National Post. 3 Aug.: Bl.
28. Wiley, L. 2002. ‘SONICblue Battles Hollywood over Use of Digital TV 28 May http://www.emedialive.com/riO/2002/news0702_02.html (accessed 3 March 2003).
29. Winseck, D. 1999.’ Back to the Future: Telecommunications, Online Information Services and Convergence from 1840