Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 50-58

  Young, Graeme ^a   Keir, Nancy ^b   Hunt, Chris ^a   Woods, Craig A ^b  

^a Visioncare Research Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Care products; Corneal staining; Dry eye; Soft contact lenses

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; FLUORESCEIN; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); POLYQUATERNIUM 1; SILICONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONJUNCTIVA DISEASE; CONJUNCTIVAL STAINING; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEAL STAINING; DRY EYE; EYE BURNING; EYE DISCOMFORT; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; HYPEREMIA; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIRMER TEST; TEAR FILM; VISUAL DISORDER; WETTABILITY;

BIGUANIDES; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; DISINFECTANTS; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYPEREMIA; POLYMERS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL; SILICONES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TEARS; TIME FACTORS; WETTABILITY; XEROPHTHALMIA;

EID: 68549122960     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31819630d3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bois A, Brazeau D, Goldberg S, et al. Performance of two single-solution contact lens care systems. Optician 1996;211:37- 42.
2. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:23-30.
3. Epstein AB. SPK with daily wear of silicone hydrogel lenses and MPS. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:30.
4. Fonn D. Observations of corneal staining with MPS and silicone hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:32.
5. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-761.
6. Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S, et al. Image analysis of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003;26:3-9.
7. Lebow KA, Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:213-220.
8. Amos C. A clinical comparison of two soft lens care systems used with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optician 2004;227:16-20.
9. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, et al. Corneal staining with multi-purpose solutions as a function of time. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:84.
10. Begley CG, Waggoner PJ, Jani NB, et al. The effects of soft contact lens disinfection solutions on rabbit corneal epithelium. CLAO J 1994;20:52-58.
11. Pham XT, Huff JW. Cytotoxicity evaluation of multi-purpose contact lens solutions using an in vitro test battery. CLAO J 1999;25:28-35.
12. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mori O, Kawaminami S. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of six multipurpose soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006;26:476-482.
13. Levy B. Superficial corneal "staining"-clinical observation and risk assessment. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:165-166.
14. Andrasko GJ, Ryen KA. A series of evaluations of MPS and silicone hydrogel lens combinations. Rev Cornea Contact Lens 2007;36-42.
15. Carnt N, Willcox MDP, Evans V, et al. Corneal staining: the IER matrix study. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:38-43.
16. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84:309-315.
17. Papas EB, Carnt N, Willcox MD, et al. Complications associated with care product use during silicone daily wear of hydrogel contact lens. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:392-393.
18. Lofstrom T, Anderson JS, Kruse A. Tarsal abnormalities: A new grading system. CLAO J 1998;24:210-215.
19. Epstein AB. Contact lens care products effect on corneal sensitivity and patient comfort. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:128-132.
20. Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, et al. A unified theory of the role of the ocular surface in dry eye. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:643-651.
21. Lievens CW, Hakim N, Chinn A. The effect of multipurpose solutions on the ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:8-11.
22. Mathers WD. Why the eye becomes dry: A cornea and lacrimal gland feedback model. CLAO J 2000;26:159-165.
23. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, et al. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:40-46.
24. Vajdic C, Holden BA, Sweeney DF, et al. The frequency of ocular symptoms during spectacle and daily soft and rigid contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:705-711.
25. Barr JT. 2004 Annual report. Contact Lens Spectrum 2005;20(1):26-32.
26. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of the other dry eye tests. Cornea 2003;22:640-650.
27. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, et al. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea 2002;21:469-475.
28. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SCG, Sanabria O, et al. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea 1998;17:38-56.
29. Lemp MA. Report of the national eye institute/industry workshop on the clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J 1995;21:221-232.
30. Nelson JD. Diagnosis of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1994;34:37-56.
31. Lamberts DW, Foster CS, Perry HD. Schirmer test after topical anesthesia and the tear meniscus height in normal eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97: 1082-1085.
32. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Abetz L, et al. The relationship between habitual patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs among patients with dry eye of varying severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4753-4761.
33. Guillon M, Styles E, Guillon JP, et al. Preocular tear film characteristics of nonwearers and soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:273-279.
34. Nichols JJ, Nichols KK, Puent B, et al. Evaluation of tear film interference patterns and measures of tear film break-up time. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79: 363-369.
35. du Toit R, Situ P, Simpson T, et al. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:455-462.
36. Narayanan S, Miller WL, Prager TC, et al. The diagnosis and characteristics of moderate to dry eye in non-contact lens wearers. Eye Contact lens 2005;31:96-104.
37. Purslow C, Wolffsohn J. The relation between physical properties of the anterior eye and ocular surface temperature. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:197- 201.
38. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Responses to a dry eye questionnaire from a normal population. J Am Optom Assoc 1987;58:588-591.
39. Bandeen-Roche K, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, et al. Self reporting assessment of dry eye in a population-based setting. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:2469-2475.
40. Dumbleton KA. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002;25:137-146.
41. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Schnider CM, et al. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:921.
42. Stern J, Wong R, Naduvlilath TJ, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6- or 30-night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:398-406.
43. Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Michell GL. The relation between tear film tests in patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 3003;23:553-560.