Quo vadis efficiency analysis of water distribution? A comparative literature review

Utilities Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 225-232

  Walter, Matthias ^a   Cullmann, Astrid ^b   von Hirschhausen, Christian ^a,b   Wand, Robert ^a   Zschille, Michael ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b DIW BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Efficiency analysis; Literature review; Water distribution

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMY OF SCALE; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; POPULATION DENSITY; WATER ECONOMICS; WATER INDUSTRY; WATER SUPPLY; WATER USE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 68549109383     PISSN: 09571787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Antonioli B., and Filippini M. The use of variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Utilities Policy 10 3-4 (2001) 181-187
2. Anwandter L., and Ozuna Jr. T. Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities. Environment and Development Economics 7 4 (2002) 687-700
3. Battese G.E., and Coelli T.J. A model for technical efficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20 2 (1995) 325-332
4. Berg S., and Lin C. Consistency in performance rankings: the Peru water sector. Journal of Applied Economics 40 6 (2007) 793-805
5. Bhattacharyya A., Harris T.R., Narayanan R., and Raffiee K. Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Regional Science and Urban Economics 25 6 (1995) 759-784
6. Bottasso, A., Conti, M., 2003. Cost inefficiency in the English and Welsh water industry: an Heteroskedastic stochastic cost frontier approach. Economics discussion papers 573, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
7. Caudill S.B., Ford J.M., and Gropper D.M. Frontier estimation and firm-specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 13 1 (1995) 105-111
8. Coelli T., and Walding S. Performance measurement in the Australian water supply industry. In: Coelli T., and Lawrence D. (Eds). Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities (2006), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
9. Coelli T.J., Estache A., Perelman S., and Trujillo L. A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators (2003), World Bank Publications, Washington, DC
10. Corton M.L. Benchmarking in the Latin American water sector: the case of Peru. Utilities Policy 11 3 (2003) 133-142
11. Corton M.L., and Berg S.V. Benchmarking Central American water utilities. Utilities Policy (2008) 10.1016/j.jup.2008.11.001
12. Cubbin J. Efficiency in the water industry. Utilities Policy 13 4 (2005) 289-293
13. Cubbin J., and Tzanidakis G. Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry. Utilities Policy 7 2 (1998) 75-85
14. Dassler T., Parker D., and Saal D.S. Methods and trends of performance benchmarking in UK utility regulation. Utilities Policy 14 3 (2006) 166-174
15. De Witte K., and Saal D.S. Is a Little Sunshine All We Need? On the Impact of Sunshine Regulation on Profits, Productivity and Prices in the Dutch Drinking Water Sector (October 2008). Available at SSRN: (2008). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290919
16. Estache, A., Kouassi, E., 2002. Sector organization, governance and the inefficiency of African water utilities. In: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3374.
17. Estache A., and Rossi M. How different is the efficiency of public and private water companies in Asia. World Bank Economic Review 16 1 (2002) 139-148
18. Estache A., Rossi M.A., and Ruzzier C.A. The case for international coordination of electricity regulation: evidence from the measurement of efficiency in South America. Journal of Regulatory Economics 25 3 (2004) 271-295
19. Estache A., and Trujillo L. Efficiency effects of 'privatization' in Argentina's water and sanitation services. Water Policy 5 4 (2003) 369-380
20. Fabbri P., and Fraquelli G. Costs and structure of technology in the Italian water industry. Empirica 27 1 (2000) 65-82
21. Farsi M., Fetz A., and Filippini M. Economies of scale and scope in multi-utilities. Energy Journal 29 4 (2008) 123-144
22. Filippini M., Hrovatin N., and Zorić J. Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods. Journal of Productivity Analysis 29 2 (2008) 169-182
23. Fraquelli G., Piacenza M., and Vannoni D. Scope and scale economies in multi-utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations. Applied Economics 36 18 (2004) 2045-2057
24. Garcia S., Moreaux M., and Reynaud A. Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: an application to the water sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25 4 (2007) 791-820
25. Garcia S., and Thomas A. The structure of municipal water supply costs: application to a panel of French local communities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 16 1 (2001) 5-29
26. García-Sánchez I.M. Efficiency measurement in Spanish local government: the case of municipal water services. Review of Policy Research 23 2 (2006) 355-371
27. García-Valinas M.A., and Muniz M.A. Is DEA useful in the regulation of water utilities? A dynamic efficiency evaluation. Applied Economics 39 2 (2007) 245-252
28. Greene W. Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics 126 2 (2005) 269-303
29. Greene W. Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis 23 1 (2005) 7-32
30. Hunt L.C., and Lynk E.L. Privatisation and efficiency in the UK water industry: an empirical analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57 3 (1995) 371-388
31. Kim H.Y., and Clark R.M. Economies of scale and scope in water supply. Regional Science and Urban Economics 18 4 (1988) 479-502
32. Kirkpatrick C., Parker D., and Zhang Y.F. State versus private sector provision of water services in Africa: an empirical analysis. The World Bank Economic Review 20 1 (2006) 143-163
33. Kumbhakar S.C., and Orea L. Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model. Empirical Economics 29 1 (2004) 169-183
34. Lin C. Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: evidence from the Peru water sector. Utilities Policy 13 3 (2005) 230-239
35. Marques R.C., and Contreras F.H.G. Performance-based potable water and sewer service regulation. The regulatory model. Cuadernos de Administración 20 34 (2007) 283-298
36. Mizutani F., and Urakami T. Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Papers in Regional Science 80 2 (2001) 211-230
37. Nauges C., and van den Berg C. Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies. Journal of Regulatory Economics 34 2 (2008) 144-163
38. Piacenza M., and Vannoni D. Choosing among alternative cost function specifications: an application to Italian multi-utilities. Economics Letters 82 3 (2004) 415-422
39. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Sáez-Fernández F.J., and González-Gómez F. Does service quality matter in measuring the performance of water utilities?. Utilities Policy 16 1 (2008) 30-38
40. Renzetti, S., Dupont, D., 2008. Measuring the technical efficiency of municipal water suppliers: the role of environmental factors. In: Working Papers 0802, Brock University, Department of Economics.
41. Saal D.S., and Parker D. The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model. Managerial and Decision Economics 21 6 (2000) 253-268
42. Saal D.S., and Parker D. Productivity and price performance in the privatized water and sewerage companies of England and Wales. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20 1 (2001) 61-90
43. Saal, D.S., Parker, D., 2005. Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: a panel input distance function approach. In: Aston Business School Working Paper RP0502.
44. Saal D.S., and Parker D. Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: a lesson in the implications of inappropriately assuming a common frontier. In: Coelli T., and Lawrence D. (Eds). Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities (2006), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
45. Saal D.S., Parker D., and Weyman-Jones T. Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000. Journal of Productivity Analysis 28 1 (2007) 127-139
46. Saal, D.S., Reid, D., 2004. Estimating opex productivity growth in English and Welsh water and sewerage companies: 1993-2003. In: Aston Business School Working Paper RP0434.
47. Sauer J., and Frohberg K. Allocative efficiency of rural water supply - a globally flexible SGM cost frontier. Journal of Productivity Analysis 27 1 (2007) 31-40
48. Shih, J.S., Harrington, W., Pizer, W.A., Gillingham, K., 2004. Economies of scale and technical efficiency in community water systems. Resources for the future. Discussion paper 04-15.
49. Stern J. UK regulatory price reviews and the role of efficiency estimates. (editorial). Utilities Policy 13 4 (2005) 273-278
50. Thanassoulis E. DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies. European Journal of Operational Research 127 1 (2000) 1-13
51. Thanassoulis E. The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: water distribution. European Journal of Operational Research 126 2 (2000) 436-453
52. Torres M., and Morrison Paul C.J. Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: a cost function approach with endogenous output. Journal of Urban Economics 59 1 (2006) 104-120
53. Tupper H.C., and Resende M. Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study. Utilities Policy 12 1 (2004) 29-40