Evaluation of hardness and surface roughness of two maxillofacial silicones following disinfection

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 49-53

  Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ^a   Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves ^a   dos Santos, Daniela Micheline ^a   Dekon, Stefan Fiúza de Carvalho ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Disinfection; Hardness; Maxillofacial prosthesis

Indexed keywords

SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISINFECTION; DRUG EFFECT; EVALUATION; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

DISINFECTION; HARDNESS; HARDNESS TESTS; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 68549107614     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242009000100009     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Lemon JC, Chambers MS, Jacobsen ML, Powers JM. Color stability of facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Dec;74(6):613-8.
2. rd, Craig RG. Physical properties of a pigmented silicone maxillofacial material as a function of accelerated aging. J Dent Res. 1980;59(7):1141-8.
3. Hanson MD, Shipman B, Verran J, Maryan CJ. Commercial cosmetics and their role in the coloring of facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Dec;50(6):818-20.
4. Goiato MC, Ribeiro PP, Santos DM, Fernandes AUR, Santos PH, Pellizzer EP. Effect of pigmentation and chemical disinfection on the elastic recovery and tear strength of a silicone maxillofacial prosthetic material. Rev Odontol Unesp. 2004 Oct-Dec;33(4):189-94.
5. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 May;77(5):535-9.
6. American Society for Testing and Materials. Designation D 2240-81: standard test method for rubber properties - Durometer hardness. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Section 9. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1988.
7. Lewis DH, Castleberry DJ. An assessment of recent advances in external maxillofacial materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Apr;43(4):426-32.
8. May PD. Maxillofacial prostheses of chlorinated polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1978 May;12(3):421-31.
9. Bell WT, Chalian VA, Moore BK. Polydimethyl siloxane materials in maxillofacial prosthetics: evaluation and comparison of physical properties. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Sep;54(3):404-10.
10. Wolfaardt JF, Chandler HD, Smith BA. Mechanical properties of a new facial prosthetic material. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Feb;53(2):228-34.
11. Sanchez RA, Moore DJ, Cruz DL, Chappell R. Comparison of the physical properties of two types of polydimethyl siloxane for fabrication of facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 May;67(5):679-82.
12. Polyzois GL. Mechanical properties of 2 new addition-vulcanizing silicone prosthetic elastomers. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jul/Aug;12(4):359-62.
13. Moore DJ, Glaser ZR, Tabacco MJ, Linebaugh MG. Evaluation of polymeric materials for maxillofacial prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1977 Sep;38(3):319-26.
14. a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1998. p. 83-106.