Mechanical Properties of 2 New Addition-Vulcanizing Silicone Prosthetic Elastomers

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 359-362

  Polyzois, Gregory L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILASTIC;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0033154750     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Andres CJ, Haug SP, Brown DT, Bernal G. Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers. Part II. Report of survey. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:519-522.
2. Adisman IK, Minsley CE. Maxillofacial prosthetics. In: Öwall B, Käyser AF, Carlsson GE (eds). Prosthodontics, Principles and Management Strategies. London: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996:216-217.
3. Wolfaardt JF, Chandler HD, Smith BA. Mechanical properties of a new facial prosthetic material. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:228-234.
4. Polyzois GL, Andreopoulos AG. Some physical properties of an improved facial elastomer: A comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:26-32.
5. Polyzois GL. Evaluation of a new silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthodont 1995;4:38-41.
6. International Organization for Standardization specification no. 37: Rubber vulcanized - Determination of tensile stress-strain properties. Geneva: ISO, 1977.
7. International Organization for Standardization specification no. 34: Rubber vulcanized-Determination of tear strength (trouser, angle and crescent test pieces). Geneva: ISO, 1979.
8. American Society for Testing and Materials designation D2240: Standard test methods for rubber properties - Durometer hardness. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, section 9. Philadelphia: ASTM, 1988.
9. Lewis DH, Castleberry DJ. An assessment of recent advances in external maxillofacial materials. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:426-432.
10. Moore DJ. Overview of materials for extra-oral prosthesis. In: Zlotolow I, Esposito S, Beumer J (eds). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Maxillofacial Prosthetics, New York, 1995:108-115.
11. Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Physical properties of three maxillofacial materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:379-383.
12. Abdelnnabi MM, Moore DJ, Sakumura JS. In vitro comparison study of MDX-4-4210 and polydimethyl siloxane silicone materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:523-526.
13. Kouyoumdjan J, Chalian VA, Moore BK. A comparison of the physical properties of a room temperature vulcanizing silicone modified and unmodified. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:388-391.
14. Conroy B, Haylock C, Hulterström A, Pratt G, de Ruite W, Winter R. Report of a four year research and development program involving the Institute of Maxillo-Facial Technology and the University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology aimed at the production of a new facial prosthetic system. In: Conroy B (ed). Proceedings of the Institute of Maxillo-Facial Technology and the International Facial Prosthetic Workshop, Roehampton, UK, 1979:218-245.