Impact of fibronectin on surface properties of intraocular lenses

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 247, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1277-1283

  Schroeder, Andreas C ^a   Lingenfelder, Christian ^b   Seitz, Berthold ^a   Grabowy, Udo ^c   Spraul, Christoph W ^d   Gatzioufas, Zisis ^a   Herrmann, Mathias ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Fluoron GmbH   (Germany)

^c NTTF GmbH   (Germany)

^d Basteicenter   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Contact angle; Fibronectin; Foreign body response; Hydrophilic; Hydrophobic; IOL; Surface

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID; FIBRONECTIN; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SILICONE;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONTACT ANGLE; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; INFECTION SENSITIVITY; LENS IMPLANT; MATERIAL COATING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADSORPTION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FIBRONECTINS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 68549086880     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1130-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Richter-Mueksch S, Kahraman G, Amon M, Schild-Burggasser G, Schauersberger J, Abela-Formanek C (2007) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility after implantation of sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1414-1418
2. Schild G, Amon M, Abela-Formanek C, Schauersberger J, Bartl G, Kruger A (2004) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a single-piece, sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens with collagen (Collamer): 1-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1254-1258
3. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Schild G, Kolodjaschna J, Barisani-Asenbauer T, Kruger A (2002) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of 2 foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis or pseudoexfoliation syndrome: Comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1160-1172
4. Schauersberger J, Amon M, Kruger A, Abela C, Schild G, Kolodjaschna J (2001) Comparison of the biocompatibility of 2 foldable intraocular lenses with sharp optic edges. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1579-1585
5. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG (1999) Surface cytologic features on intraocular lenses: Can increased biocompatibility have disadvantages? Arch Ophthalmol 117:872-878
6. Kanagawa R, Saika S, Ohmi S, Tamura M, Nakao T (1990) Presence and distribution of fibronectin on the surface of implanted intraocular lenses in rabbits. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228:398-400
7. Linnola RJ, Werner L, Pandey SK, Escobar-Gomez M, Znoiko SL, Apple DJ (2000) Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. Part 2: Explanted intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1807-1818
8. Linnola RJ, Werner L, Pandey SK, Escobar-Gomez M, Znoiko SL, Apple DJ (2000) Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. Part 1: Histological sections. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1792-1806
9. Ratner BD (2001) Replacing and renewing: Synthetic materials, biomimetics, and tissue engineering in implant dentistry. J Dent Educ 65:1340-1347
10. Herrmann M, Vaudaux PE, Pittet D, Auckenthaler R, Lew PD, Schumacher-Perdreau F, Peters G, Waldvogel FA (1988) Fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin act as mediators of adherence of clinical staphylococcal isolates to foreign material. J Infect Dis 158:693-701
11. Vaudaux P, Pittet D, Haeberli A, Lerch PG, Morgenthaler JJ, Proctor RA, Waldvogel FA, Lew DP (1993) Fibronectin is more active than fibrin or fibrinogen in promoting Staphylococcus aureus adherence to inserted intravascular catheters. J Infect Dis 167:633-641
12. Schroeder AC, Schmidbauer JM, Sobke A, Seitz B, Ruprecht KW, Herrmann M (2008) Influence of fibronectin on the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to coated and uncoated intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:497-504
13. Dick HB, Frohn A, Augustin AJ, Wolters B, Pakula T, Pfeiffer N (2001) Physicochemical surface properties of various intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic Res 33:303-309
14. Tehrani M, Dick HB, Wolters B, Pakula T, Wolf E (2004) Material properties of various intraocular lenses in an experimental study. Ophthalmologica 218:57-63
15. Probst K, Fijnheer R, Schellekens P, Rothova A (2004) Intraocular and plasma levels of cellular fibronectin in patients with uveitis and diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol 88:667-672
16. Johnston RL, Spalton DJ, Hussain A, Marshall J (1999) In vitro protein adsorption to 2 intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1109-1115
17. Linnola RJ, Sund M, Ylonen R, Pihlajaniemi T (2003) Adhesion of soluble fibronectin, vitronectin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:146-152
18. Saika S, Tanaka S, Ohmi S, Minamide A, Ohnishi Y, Yamanaka A, Ooshima A, Kimura M (1997) Deposition of extracellular matrix on intraocular lenses in rabbits: An immunohistochemical and transmission electron microscopic study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:241-247
19. Saika S, Miyamoto T, Yamanaka A, Kawashima Y, Okada Y, Tanaka S, Yamanaka O, Ohmi S, Ohnishi Y, Ooshima A (1998) Immunohistochemical evaluation of cellular deposits on posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:758-765
20. Kohnen T (1996) The variety of foldable intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 22(Suppl 2):1255-1258
21. Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Lina G, Roques C, Pellon G, Freney J, Renaud FN (2003) Biofilm formation on intraocular lenses by a clinical strain encoding the ica locus: A scanning electron microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4382-4387
22. Sandhu S, Luthra A (2002) New biointeracting materials. Med Device Technol 13:10-16