Material properties of various intraocular lenses in an experimental study

Ophthalmologica

Volumn 218, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 57-63

  Tehrani, Mana ^a,c   Dick, H Burkhard ^a   Wolters, Beate ^a   Pakula, Tadeusz ^b   Wolf, Evan ^c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR POLYMER RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrogel; Intraocular lens; Material properties

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DIMETICONE; HEPARIN DERIVATIVE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SILICONE;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONTACT ANGLE; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHILICITY; LENS IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ACRYLATES; CALORIMETRY, DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SILICONES;

EID: 0346786516     PISSN: 00303755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000074568     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dick HB, Schwenn O: Viscoelastics in Ophthalmic Surgery, ed 1. Berlin, Springer, 2000.
2. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, Pande MV: Biocompatibility of poly(methylmethacrylate), silicone, and AcrySof intraocular lenses: Randomized comparison of the cellular reaction on the anterior lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:361-366.
3. Leaming DV: Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members - 1998 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:851-859.
4. Amon M, Menapace R, Papapanos P, Radax U, Vass C: Klinisch, morphologische Ergebnisse mit drei unterschiedlichen PMMA-Hinterkammerlinsen für die Kleinschnitt-Kataraktchirurgie. Spektrum Augenheilkd 1992;6:273-277.
5. Wenzel M, Reim M, Heinze M, Böcking A: Cellular invasion on the surface of intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988;226:449-454.
6. Yamanaka A, Kazusa R, Takayama S: Cells on the various kinds of intraocular lens implants. Eur J Implant Refract Surg 1989;1:15-17.
7. Amon M, Menapace R: In vivo documentation of cellular reactions on lens-surfaces for assessing the biocompatibility of different intraocular implants. Eye 1994;8:649-656.
8. Dick HB, Frohn A, Augustin A, Wolters B, Pakula T, Pfeiffer N: Physiochemical surface properties of various intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic Res 2001;33:303-309.
9. Amon M, Menapace R, Radax U, Freyler H: In vivo study of cell reactions on poly(methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses with different surface properties. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22(suppl 1):825-829.
10. Amon M: Biocompatibility of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:178-179.
11. International Dictionary of Medicine and Biology. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1986, vol 1, p 186.
12. Cunanan CM, Ghazizadeh M, Buchen SY, Knight PM: Contactangle analysis of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:341-351.
13. Tognetto D, Ravalico G: Inflammatory cell adhesion and surface defects on heparin-surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses in diabetic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:239-244.
14. Miyake K, Ota I, Miyake S, Maekubo K: Correlation between intraocular lens hydrophilicity and anterior capsule opacification and aqueous flare. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22(suppl 1):764-769.
15. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG: Surface cytologic features on intraocular lenses: Can increased biocompatibility have disadvantages? Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:872-878.
16. Scaramuzza A, Fernando GT, Crayford BB: Posterior capsule opacification and lens epithelial cell layer formation: Hydroview hydrogel versus AcrySof acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1047-1054.
17. Mullner-Eidenbock A, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Abela C, Petternel V, Zidek T: Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;5:734-740.
18. Kruger AJ, Schauersberger J, Abela C, Schild G, Amon M: Two year results: Sharp versus rounded optic edges on silicone lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:566-570.
19. Schauersberger J, Amon M, Kruger A, Abela C, Schild G, Kolodjaschna J: Comparison of the biocompatibility of 2 foldable intraocular lenses with sharp optic edges. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1579-1585.
20. Cunanan CM, Tarbaux NM, Knight PM: Surface properties of intraocular lens materials and their influence on in vitro cell adhesion. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:767-773.
21. Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Abela C, Mullner-Eidenbock A, Petternel V, Svolba G, Amon M: Course of postoperative inflammation after implantation of 4 types of foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1116-1120.