Individual differences in response to novelty and the conditioned locomotor effects of nicotine

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 322-329

  Coolon, Rosemary A ^a   Cain, Mary E ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned hyperactivity; High responder; Individual differences; Locomotor activity; Low responder; Nicotine; Rat; Reinstatement

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE TARTRATE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENVIRONMENT; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGONISTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 68449090717     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32832f0176     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Belluzzi J, Lee A, Oliff H, Leslie F (2004). Age-dependent effects of nicotine on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology(Berl) 174:389-395.
2. Benwell ME, Balfour DJ (1992). Theeffects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accumbensdopamine and locomotor activity. Br J Phamacol 105:849-856.
3. Bevins RA, Besheer J (2001). Individualdifferences in rat locomotor activity are diminished by nicotinethrough stimulation of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Physiol Behav 72:237-244.
4. Bevins RA, Palmatier Ml (2004). Extending the role of associative learning processes innicotine addiction. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3:143-158.
5. Bevins RA, Besheer J, Pickett KS (2001). Nicotine-conditionedlocomotor activity in rats: dopamingeric and GABAergic influences onconditioned expression. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:135-145.
6. Caggiula AR, Donny EC, White AR, Chaudhri N, Booth S, Gharib MA, et al. (2001). Cue dependency of nicotineself-administration and smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70:515-530.
7. Cain ME, Denehy ED, Bardo MT (2008). Individualdifferences in amphetamine self-administration: the role of thecentral nucleus of the amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1149-1161.
8. Clarke PBS, Kumar R (1983). The effects ofnicotine on locomotor activity in nontolerant and tolerant rats. Br J Pharmacol 78:329-337.
9. Donohew RL, Lorch EP, Palmgreen P (1991). Sensation seeking and targeting of televisedanti-drug PSAs. In: Donohew L, Sypher H, Bukoski WJ, editors. Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
10. Fagen ZM, Mitchum R, Vezina P, McGehee DS (2007). Enhanced nicotinic receptor function and drug abuse vulnerability. J Neurosci 27:8771-8778.
11. Frieman J (2002). Learning and adaptive behavior. Belmont, California: WadsworthThomson Learning.
12. Gingras MA, Cools AR (1996). Analysis of thebiphasic locomotor response to ethanol in high and low responders tonovelty: a study in Nijmegen Wistar rats. Psychopharmacology(Berl) 125:258-264.
13. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smithy AD, Neill DB, Justice JB (1991). Individual differences in locomotoractivity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:467-470.
14. Jodogne C, Marinelli M, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (1994). Animals predisposed to develop amphetamineself-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextualconditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657:236-244.
15. Klebaur JE, Bevins RA, Segar TM, Bardo MT (2001). Individual differences inbehavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administrationin male and female rats. Behav Pharmacol 12:267-275.
16. Koob GF, Le Moal M (2001). Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24:97-129.
17. Liu X, Weiss F (2004). Nitric oxide synthesis inhibition attenuatedconditioned reinstatement of ethanol-seeking, but not the primaryreinforcing effects of ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28:1194-1199.
18. Liu X, Caggiula AR, Yee SK, Nobuta H, Poland RE, Pechnick R N (2006). Reinstatment of nicotine-seeking behavior bydrug-associated stimuli after extinction in rats. Psychopharmacology 184:417-425.
19. National ResearchCouncil (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratoryanimals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Nisell M, Nomikos GG, Svensson TH (1994). Systemic nicotine induced dopaminerelease in the rat nucleus accumbens is regulated by nicotinicreceptors in the ventral tegmental area. Synapse 16:36-44.
21. Paterson NE, Froestle W, Markou A (2005). Repeated administration of the GABAB receptor agonist CGP44532decreased nicotine self-administration, and acute administrationdecreased cue-induced reinstatement of nicotineseeking in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:119-128.
22. Pavlov IP (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
23. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989). Factors thatpredict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511-1513.
24. Reid M, Ho L, Berger S (1996). Effects of environmental conditioning on the development ofnicotine sensitization: behavioral and neurochemical analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 126:301-310.
25. Rose JE, Behm FM, Levin ED (1993). Role of nicotine dose and sensory cues in theregulation of smoke intake. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44:891-900.
26. Rosecrans JA (1971). Effects of nicotine onbehavioral arousal and brain 5-hydroxytryptamine function in femalerats selected for differences in activity. Eur J Pharmacol 14:29-37.
27. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J (2003). The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodologyand major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168:3-20.
28. Stolerman IP, Fink R, Jarvik ME (1973). Acute and chronictolerance to nicotine measured by activity in rats. Psychopharmacologia 30:329-342.
29. Suto N, Autin JD, Vezina P (2001). Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat'spropensity to self-administer nicotine. Psychopharmacology(Berl) 158:175-180.
30. Walter S, Kuschinsky K (1989). Conditioning of nicotine effects on motility and behaviour in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 339:208-213.
31. Zhu J, Bardo MT, Bruntz RC, Stairs DJ, Dwoskin LP (2007). Individualdifferences in response to novelty predict prefrontal cortex dopaminetransporter function and cell surface expression. Eur JPharmacol 26:717-728.
32. Zuckerman M (1994). Behavioralexpressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.