Campaign dynamics in battleground and nonbattleground states

Public Opinion Quarterly

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 119-129

  Panagopoulos, Costas ^a  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349150384     PISSN: 0033362X     EISSN: 15375331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfp010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bartels, Larry. 1985. "Resource Allocationin a Presidential Campaign." Journal of Politics47:928- 36.
2. Benoit, William, Glenn Hansen, and R. Lance Holbert. 2004. "Presidential Campaigns and Democracy." Mass Communication and Society 7:177-90.
3. Bergan, Daniel, Alan Gerber, Donald Green, and Costas Panagopoulos. 2005. "Grassroots Mobilization in the 2004 Presidential Election." Public Opinion Quarterly 69:760-77.
4. Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign. College Station, TX: A&M.
5. Crespi, Irving. 1988. Pre-election Polling: Sources of Accuracy and Error. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Erikson, Robert, Costas Panagopoulos, and Christopher Wlezien. 2004. "Likely (and Unlikely) Voters and the Assessment of Campaign Dynamics. Public Opinion Quarterly 68(4):588-601.
7. Erikson, Robert, and Karl Sigman. 2000a. "Gore Favored in the Electoral College." Unpublished manuscript. http://www.columbia.edu/ ∼ks20/Erik-sig-web-battleground.pdf (February 12, 2007).
8. Erikson, Robert, and Karl Sigman. 2000b. "Why Gore Was not Strongly Favored in the Electoral College under a Dead Heat Popular Vote." Unpublished manuscript. http://www.columbia.edu/ ∼ks20/deadheat-post.pdf (February 12, 2007).
9. Erikson, Robert, and Christopher Wlezien. 1999. "Presidential Polls as a Time Series: The Case of 1996." Public Opinion Quarterly 63:163-77.
10. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1993. "Why Are American Presidential Election Polls so Variable when Votes Are so Predictable?" British Journal of Political Science 23:409-51.
11. Holbrook, Thomas. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Johnston, Richard, Michael Hagen, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kenski, Kate. 2004. "Visualizing Data across the Campaign." In Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey: Design, Method, and Data, eds. Daniel Romer, Kate Kenski, Paul Waldman, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Lipsitz, Keena. 2004. "The Significance of Rich Information Environments: Voter Knowledge in Battleground States." Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
15. Panagopoulos, Costas. 2006. "Vested Interests: Interest Group Resource Allocation in Presidential Campaigns." Journal of Political Marketing 5:59-78.
16. Panagopoulos, Costas, and Peter Wielhouwer. 2008. "Polls and Elections: The Ground War 2000- 2004: Strategic Targeting in Grassroots Campaigns." Presidential Studies Quarterly 38:347-62.
17. Romer, Daniel, Kate Kenski, Paul Waldman, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey: Design, Method, and Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Shaw, Daron. 1999. "The Method Behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral Strategies, 1988- 1996." Journal of Politics 61:893-913.
19. Wlezien, Christopher, and Robert Erikson. 2002. "The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns." Journal of Politics 64:969-93.