Computational docking of biomolecular complexes with autodock

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Goodsell, David S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG RESEARCH; MOLECULAR DOCKING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 68349117038     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.prot5200     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Gschwend, D.A., Good, A.C., and Kuntz, I.D. 1996. Molecular docking towards drug discovery. J. Mol. Recognit. 9: 175-186.
2. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 2002. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins Struct. Fund. Genet. 47: 409-443.
3. Jackson, R.C. 1995. Update on computer-aided drug design. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6: 646-651.
4. Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M. 1996. Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6: 402-406.
5. Lybrand, T.P. 1995. Ligand-protein docking and rational drug design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5: 224-228.
6. Marrone, T.J., Briggs, J.M., and McCammon, J.A. 1997. Structure-based drug design: Computational advances. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37: 71-90.
7. Osterberg, F., Morris, G.M., Sanner, M.F., Olson, A.J., and Goodsell, D.S. 2002. Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 46: 34-40.
8. Rosenfeld, R., Vajda, S., and Delisi, C. 1995. Flexible docking and design. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol Struct. 24: 677-700.
9. Smith, G.R. and Sternberg, M.J.E. 2002. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 28-35.
10. Wlodawer, A. and Erickson, J.W. 1993. Structure-based inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62: 543-585.