Converting the SF-12 into the EQ-5D: An empirical comparison of methodologies

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 491-505

  Chuang, Ling Hsiang ^a   Kind, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 12; SHORT FORM 36;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC;

EID: 68349106704     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: 11792027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200927060-00005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Costeffectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996
2. Ware JE, Sonw KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993
3. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scale: a user's manual. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New EnglandMedical Center, 1994
4. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bower D, et al. How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric, 2002
5. Mortimer D, Segal L. Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health states into QALYweights. Med Decis Making 2008; 28: 66-88
6. Bosch JR, Hunink MGM. The relationship between descriptive and valuation quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication. Med Decis Making 1996; 16: 217-225 (Pubitemid 26230572)
7. Franks P, Lubetkin EI, Gold MR, et al. Mapping the SF-12 to preference-based instruments: convergent validity in a low-income, minority population. Med Care 2003; 41 (11): 1277-1283
8. Franks P, Lubetkin EI, Gold MR, et al. Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D index in a national US sample. Med Decis Making 2004; 24 (3): 247-254 (Pubitemid 38656308)
9. Fryback DG, Lawrence WF, Martin PA, et al. Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Med Decis Making 1997; 17 (1): 1-9
10. Gray A, Rivero-Arias O, Clarke P. Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Med Decis Making 2006; 26: 18-29 (Pubitemid 43134124)
11. Lawrence WF, Fleishman JA. Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 health survey in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Making 2004; 24 (2): 160-169
12. Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson DG, et al. The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Med Decis Making 1999; 19 (2): 128-140 (Pubitemid 29318142)
13. Nichol MB, Sengupta N, Globe DR. Evaluating qualityadjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36. Med Decis Making 2001; 21 (2): 105-112 (Pubitemid 32318761)
14. Sengupta N, Nichol MB, Wu J, et al. Mapping the SF-12 to the HUI3 and VAS in a managed care population. Med Care 2004; 42 (9): 927-937 (Pubitemid 39456925)
15. Shmueli A. The SF36 profile and health-related quality of life: an interpretive analysis. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 187-195 (Pubitemid 28180037)
16. Shmueli A. The relationship between the visual analogue scale and the SF-36 scales in the general population: an update. Med Decis Making 2004; 24 (1): 61-63 (Pubitemid 38116858)
17. Shmueli A. Subjective health status and health values in the general population. Med Decis Making 1999; 19 (2): 122-127 (Pubitemid 29318141)
18. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V. Mapping the EQ-5D index form the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Making 2006; 26: 401-409 (Pubitemid 44050844)
19. Tesvat J, Solzan JG, Kuntz KM, et al. Health values of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus: relationship to mental health and physical function. Med Care 1996; 34: 44-57
20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Homepage [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/ [Accessed 2006 Mar 23]
21. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). MEPS HC-079: 2003 full year consolidated data file [online]. Available from URL: http://www.meps.ahrq. gov/ mepsweb/data-stats/download-data-files-detail.jsp?cboPuf Number=HC-079 [Accessed 2006 Mar 23]
22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel survey [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/ [Accessed 2006 Mar 23]
23. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. How to score the SF-12 physical & mental health summary scales. 3rd ed. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric, 1998
24. Brook R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72
25. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337-343 (Pubitemid 32675374)
26. Szenda A, Oppe M, Devlin N, editors. EQ-5D value sets: inventory, comparative review and user guide. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2007
27. Kind K, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005
28. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005; 43 (3): 203-220
29. Powell J. Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model. J Econometr 1984; 25: 303-325
30. Austin PC, Escobar M, Kopec JA. The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 901-910 (Pubitemid 32210184)
31. Austin PC. Bayesian extension of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status. Med Decis Making 2002; 22: 152-162
32. Austin PC. A comparison of methods for analyzing healthrelated quality-of-life measures. Value Health 2002; 5 (4): 329-337 (Pubitemid 36998745)
33. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Microeconometrics: methods and application. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005
34. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 9.2. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation, 2007
35. Bult JR, Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions. Med Decis Making 1996; 16: 226-233
36. Mortimer D, Segal L, HawthorneG, et al. Item-based versus subscale-based mapping form the SF-36 to a preferencebased quality of life measure. Value Health 2007; 10: 398-406 (Pubitemid 47481111)
37. Hollingworth W, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD, et al. The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain. Health Econ 2002; 11 (1): 71-85 (Pubitemid 34097623)
38. Kaplan RM, Groessl EJ, Sengupta N, et al. Comparison of measured utility scores and imputed scores from the SF-36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 2005; 43 (1): 79-87 (Pubitemid 40137617)
39. Lee TA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Comparison of directly elicited preferences to preferences derived from the SF-36 in adults with asthma. Med Decis Making 2003; 23 (4): 323-334 (Pubitemid 36899098)
40. McDonough CM, Grove MR, Tosteson TD, et al. Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived social health state values among Spine Patient Outcome Research Trial (SPORT) participants. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1321-1332
41. Lobo FS, Gross CR, Mattees BJ. Estimation and comparison of derived preference scores form the SF-36 in lung transplant patients. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 377-388
42. Sherbourne CD, Unutzer J, Schoenbaum M, et al. Can utility-weighted HRQoL estimate capture health effect of quality improvement for depression? Med Care 2001; 39: 1246-1259
43. Pickard AS, Wang Z, Walton SM, et al. Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3 (1): 1-11
44. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004; 42 (9): 851-859 (Pubitemid 39456916)
45. Kind P. York expert workshop in the social economic evaluation of medicines, model 3: quality of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2006
46. Chuang L-H. Homepage [online]. Available from URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/ inst/che/staff/chuang.htm [Accessed 2009 Feb 4]
47. Sugar CA, Srurm R, Lee TT, et al. Empirically defined health states for depression form the SF-12. Health Serv Res 1998; 33 (4): 911-928
48. Lenert LA, Sherbourne CD, Sugar CA, et al. Estimation of utilities for the effects of depression from the SF-12. Med Care 2000; 38 (7): 763-770