Surfactant release from hydrophilized vinylpolysiloxanes

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 88, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 668-672

  Balkenhol, M ^a   Haunschild, S ^a   Lochnit, G ^a   Wostmann B ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contact angle; Elastomer; Experimental; Hydrophilicity; Impression material; MALDI TOF MS; Surfactant; Vinylpolysiloxane

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; SURFACTANT; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DIFFUSION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE TENSION; WETTABILITY;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DIFFUSION; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION-IONIZATION; SURFACE TENSION; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 68249159825     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034509339721     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anusavice KJ, editor (2003). Phillips' science of dental materials. St. Louis: Saunders.
2. Beier US, Grunert I, Kulmer S, Dumfahrt H (2007). Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients. Int J Prosthodont 20:270-274.
3. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Burgess JO, Mercante D, Hoist S (2005). Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material - a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 36:97-104.
4. Böning KW, Walter MH, Schuette U (1998). Clinical significance of surface activation of silicone impression materials. J Dent 26:447-452.
5. Chai JY, Yeung TC (1991). Wettability of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 4:555-560.
6. Chong YH, Soh G, Setchell DJ, Wickens JL (1990). Relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts. Dent Mater 6:162-166.
7. Cohen LH, Gusev AI (2002). Small molecule analysis by MALDI mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 373:571-586.
8. Cullen DR, Mikeseil JW, Sandrik JL (1991). Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts. J Prosthet Dent 66:261-265.
9. Grundke K, Michel S, Knispel G, Grundler A (2008). Wettability of silicone and polyether impression materials: Characterization by surface tension and contact angle measurements. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspect 317:598-609.
10. ISO, International Standardization Organization (2000). Dental materials: sciences and health care module 5: dentistry-elastomeric impression materials. BSEN ISO 4823:2001.
11. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Komatsu M (2007). Surface detail reproduction with new elastomeric dental impression materials. Quintessence Int 38:479-488.
12. Karas M, Bahr U (1990). Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Trends Anal Chem 9:321-325.
13. Kugel G, Klettke T, Goldberg JA, Benchimol J, Perry RD, Sharma S (2007). Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials. J Prosthodont 16:84-92.
14. Lee DY, Oh YI, Chung KH, Kim KM, Kim KN (2004). Mechanism study on surface activation of surfactant-modified polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. J Applied Polymer Sci 92:2395-2401.
15. Mandikos MN (1998). Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. Aust Dent J 43:428-434.
16. McCormick JT, Antony SJ, Dial ML, Duncanson MG Jr, Shillingburg HT Jr (1989). Wettability of elastomeric impression materials: effect of selected surfactants. Int J Prosthodont 2:413-420.
17. Mondon M, Ziegler C (2003). Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 16:49-53.
18. Nichols PV (1999). Hydrophilicity? Aust Dent J 44:285-286.
19. Norling BK, Reisbick MH (1979). The effect of nonionic surfactants on bubble entrapment in elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 42:342-347.
20. Oh YI, Lee DY, Hwang SY, Kim KN, Kim KM (2003). Effect of non-ionic surfactants on surface properties of hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Colloids Surf A-Physicochem Eng Aspects 229:9-17.
21. Pétrie CS, Walker MP, O'Mahony AM, Spencer P (2003). Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions. J Prosthet Dent 90:365-372.
22. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (1988). Impression materials: effect of hydrophilicity and viscosity on ability to displace water from dentin surfaces. Eur J Oral Sci 96:253-259.
23. Pratten DH, Craig RG (1989). Wettability of a hydrophilic addition silicone impression material. J Prosthet Dent 61:197-202.
24. Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, Ryan TN, Johnston WM (2000). Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Int J Prosthodont 13:214-220.
25. Rupp F, Axmann D, Jacobi A, Groten M, Geis-Gerstörfer J (2005). Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting. Dent Mater 21:94-102.
26. Seo J, Lee LP (2006). Effects on wettability by surfactant accumulation/depletion in bulk polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 119:192-198.
27. Stewardson DA (2005). Trends in indirect dentistry: 5. Impression materials and techniques. Dent Update 32:374-384.
28. Sumiya H, Lowell DW, Jacobi R, Brackett SE (1997). Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Shillinburg HT, editor. Chicago: Quintessence.
29. Takahashi H, Finger WJ (1991). Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials. Dent Mater 7:197-201.
30. Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP (1993a). Surface properties of elastomeric impression materials. J Dent 21:297-301.
31. Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP (1993b). Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2:29-33.