Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 49-53

  Mondon, Matthias ^a   Ziegler, Christiane ^a,b,c  

^a Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

^b Ger Nanotechnology Competence C   (Germany)

^c Steinbeis Transfer Center   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHER; SILICON DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; WATER; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYMER; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; RESIN; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTACT ANGLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; HYDROPHILICITY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLYMERIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WETTABILITY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; HYDROPHOBICITY; IMPREGUM; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; VISCOSITY;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMERS; POLYVINYLS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; RHEOLOGY; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY; WATER; WETTABILITY;

EID: 0038644418     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. McCabe JF, Arikawa H. Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials before and during setting. J Dent Res 1998;77:1874-1880.
2. Kess RS, Combe EC, Sparks BS. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:98-102.
3. Lepe X, Johnson GH, Berg JC, Aw TC. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:495-502.
4. Boening KW, Walter MH, Schuette U. Clinical significance of surface activation of silicone impression materials. J Dent 1998;26:447-452.
5. Takahashi H, Finger WJ. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials. Dent Mater 1991;7:197-201.
6. Rupp F, Mondon M, Geis-Gersdörfer J, Ziegler C, Wurm EM, Reusch B. Dynamic contact angle measurements on two type 3 impression materials [abstract 2427]. J Dent Res 2000;79:447.
7. Mondon M, Reusch B, Ziegler CH. Surface wettability during the curing process of impression materials [abstract 618]. J Dent Res 2001;80:113.
8. Dentsply/DeTrey. Aquasil, Quadrofunctional Hydrophilic Siloxane [technical manual]. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply/DeTrey, 2000.
9. Jia W, Sorensen JA. Wet detail reproduction and dynamic contact angle of impression materials [abstract 1679]. J Dent Res 2001;80:245.
10. von Ritter A. Clinical Case Report - Porcelain Fused to Metal (PFM) Crown. 3M/ESPE Impregum Penta Soft Technical Product File. Seefeld, Germany: 3M/ESPE, 2001:28-29.
11. Seidel C. Erste praktische Erfahrungen mit Impregum Penta Soft. Zahnarztl Wirtschaft Prax 2000;6:143-147.
12. Schug T, Dumbach J. Oberkieferresektionsdefekt mit Obturatorprothese versorgt. Zahnarztl Mitt 1999;19:48-50.