Mediating academic research: The assessment reform group experience

Research Papers in Education

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 139-153

  Daugherty, Richard ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Reform; Research policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149173205     PISSN: 02671522     EISSN: 14701146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02671520701296072     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Assessment Reform Group (1999) Assessment for learning: beyond the black box (Cambridge, University School of Education).
2. Assessment Reform Group (2002a) Testing, motivation and learning (Cambridge, University School of Education).
3. Assessment Reform Group (2002b) Assessment for learning: 10 principles (Cambridge, University School of Education).
4. Assessment Reform Group (2006) The role of teachers in the assessment of learning (London, University Institute of Education).
5. Baker, E. (2003) From usable to useful knowledge: a design problem. CSA report 612 (Los Angeles, University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation).
6. Black, P. (1997) Whatever happened to TGAT, in: C. Cullingford (Ed.) Assessment vs. Evaluation (London, Cassell).
7. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998a) Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-73.
8. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b) Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment (London, King’s College School of Education).
9. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2003) In praise of educational research: formative assessment, British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623-637.
10. Broadfoot, P., Dockrell, B., Gipps, C., Harlen, W. & Nuttall, D. (1992) Policy issues in national assessment: BERA dialogues no. 7 (Clevedon, Multilingual Matters).
11. Daugherty, R. (1995) National Curriculum assessment: a review of policy 1987-1994 (London, Falmer).
12. Daugherty, R., Broadfoot, P., Gardner, J., Harlen, W., James, M. & Stobart, G. (2000) Assessment Reform Group: linking research to policy, Research Intelligence, 73, 19.
13. Daugherty, R. & Ecclestone, K. (2006) Constructing assessment for learning in the UK policy environment, in: J. Gardner (Ed.) Assessment and learning (London, Sage).
14. DES (1988) Task Group on Assessment and Testing: a report (London, Department of Education and Science).
15. Edwards, A. (2006) Working with users to develop educational research: review of what has been learned so far. Available online at: www.tlrp.org/themes (accessed 28 September 2006).
16. Edwards, T. (2000) Some reasonable expectations of educational research: UCET research paper No. 2 (London, Universities Council for the Education of Teachers).
17. Elliott, J. (1990) Educational research in crisis, British Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 3-18.
18. Furlong, J. & Oancea, A. (2006) Assessing quality in applied and practice-based research in educa-tion: a framework for discussion, Review of Australian Research in Education: Counterpoints on the Quality and Impact of Educational Research, 6, 89-104. Available online at: www.bera.ac.uk/ pdfs/Qualitycriteria.pdf (accessed 18 May 2006).
19. Furlong, J. & White, P. (2002) Educational research capacity in Wales: a review (Cardiff, University School of Social Sciences).
20. Gardner, J. (Ed.) (2006) Assessment and learning (London, Sage).
21. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (London, Sage).
22. Harlen, W. (1992) Task group on assessment, Research Intelligence, 44, 13.
23. Harlen, W. (Ed.) (1994) Enhancing quality in assessment (London, Paul Chapman).
24. Harlen, W. (2004a) A systematic review of the evidence of the reliability and validity of assessment by teachers for summative purposes (London, EPPI Centre, Institute of Education).
25. Harlen, W. (2004b) A systematic review of the evidence of the impact on students, teachers and the curriculum of assessment by teachers used for summative purposes (London, EPPI Centre, Institute of Education).
26. Harlen, W. & Deakin Crick, R. (2004) Opportunities and challenges of using systematic reviews of research in evidence-based policy in education, Evaluation and Research in Education, 18(12), 54-71.
27. Harlen, W., Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Gipps, C., James, M. & Stobart, G. (1998) BERA Policy Task Group on Assessment: final report, Research Intelligence, 64, 14.
28. Humes, W. & Bryce, T. (2001) Scholarship, research and the evidential basis of policy development in education, British Journal of Educational Studies, 49(3), 329-352.
29. Lawn, M. & Rees, G. (2007) Mapping education research in the UK: introduction, European Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 52-54.