Weed management using reduced rate combinations of diclosulam, flumioxazin, and imazapic in peanut

Weed Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 236-242

  Ducar, J Tredaway ^a,f   Clewis, S B ^b   Wilcut, J W ^b   Jordan, D L ^b   Brecke, B J ^c   Grichar, W J ^d   Johnson, W C ^e   Wehtje, G R ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^f AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Florida beggarweed; Herbicide rate; Ivyleaf morningglory; Peanut; Pitted morningglory; Sicklepod; Yellow nutsedge

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE; LEGUME; SEDGE; SEEDLING EMERGENCE; WEED CONTROL;

ALABAMA; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; GEORGIA; NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; CYPERUS; CYPERUS ESCULENTUS; DESMODIUM TORTUOSUM; IPOMOEA; IPOMOEA HEDERACEA; IPOMOEA LACUNOSA; SENNA; SENNA OBTUSIFOLIA;

EID: 68149161820     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-07-180.1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anonymous. 2001a. Cadre DG product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation.
2. Anonymous. 2001b. Strongarm product label. Indianapolis, IN: Dow Agro-Sciences LLC.
3. Anonymous. 2002. Valor product label. Walnut Creek, CA: Valent USA Corporation.
4. Askew, S. D., J. W. Wilcut, and J. R. Cranmer. 1999. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with flumioxazin preemergence. Weed Technol. 13:594-598.
5. Bailey, W. A. and J. W. Wilcut. 2002. Diclosulam systems for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.). Weed Technol. 16:807-814.
6. Bailey, W. A., J. W. Wilcut, D. L. Jordan, C. W. Swann, and V. B. Langston. 1999. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with diclosulam preemergence. Weed Technol. 13:450-456.
7. Bailey, W. A., J. W. Wilcut, J. F. Spears, T. G. Isleib, and V. B. Langston. 2000. Diclosulam does not influence yield in eight Virginia market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Weed Technol. 14:402-405.
8. Buhler, D. D., J. L. Gunsolus, and D. F. Ralston. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced rates of bentazon and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41:447-453.
9. Clewis, S. B., S. D. Askew, and J. W. Wilcut. 2002. Economic assessment of diclosulam and flumioxazin in strip-and conventional-tillage peanut. Weed Sci. 50:378-385.
10. DeFelice, M. S., W. B. Brown, R. J. Adrich, B. D. Sims, D. T. Judy, and D. R. Guethle. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with below-label rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365-374.
11. Devlin, D. L., J. H. Long, and L. D. Maddux. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:834-840.
12. Doll, J., R. Doersch, R. Proost, and P. Kivlin. 1992. Reduced Herbicide Rates: Aspects to Consider. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Cooperative Extension Publication A3563, Pp. 7-16.
13. Ducar, J. T., B. J. Brecke, and G. E. MacDonald. 2002. Weeds in the Sunshine: Weed Management in Peanuts-2002. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service SS-AGR-03.
14. Eadie, A. G., C. J. Swanton, J. E. Shaw, and G. W. Anderson. 1992. Banded herbicide applications and cultivation in a modified no-till corn (Zea mays) system. Weed Technol. 6:535-542.
15. Frans, R. E., R. Talbert, D. Marx, and H. Crowley. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices., 29-46. inN. D. Camper, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. Pp. 29-46.
16. Gebhart, M. R. 1981. Preemergence herbicides and cultivations for soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:165-168.
17. Green, J. M. 1991. Maximizing herbicide efficiency with mixtures and expert systems. Weed Technol. 5:894-897.
18. Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, and E. F. Eastin. 2001. Influence of application rate and timing of diclosulam on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 28:13-19.
19. Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, E. F. Eastin, and G. E. MacDonald. 2002. Influence of flumioxazin rate and herbicide combinations on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 29:24-29.
20. Grey, T. L. and G. R. Wehtje. 2005. Residual herbicide weed control systems in peanut. Weed Technol. 19:560-567.
21. Grichar, W. J., C. A. Gerngross, R. L. Lemon, S. A. Senseman, B. A. Besler, and V. B. Langston. 2001. Interaction of peanut variety, diclosulam rate, and temperature on seed germination. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:200.
22. Hauser, E. W., G. A. Buchanan, A. Gale, R. L. Nichols, and R. M. Patterson. 1982. Effects of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. Weed Sci. 30:602-604.
23. Jensen, P. K. and P. Kudsk. 1988. Prediction of herbicide activity. Weed Res. 28:473-478.
24. Karnei, J. R., P. A. Dotray, J. W. Keeling, and T. A. Baughman. 2001. Diclosulam performance in Texas High Plains peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:37.
25. Karnei, J. R., P. A. Dotray, J. W. Keeling, and T. A. Baughman. 2002. Weed control and peanut response to diclosulam. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:32.
26. Klingman, T. E., C. A. King, and L. R. Oliver. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity.Weed Sci. 40:227-232.
27. Main, C. L., J. T. Ducar, and G. E. MacDonald. 2002. Response of three runnertype peanut cultivars to diclosulam. Weed Technol. 16:593-596.
28. Main, C. L., J. T. Ducar, E. B. Whitty, and G. E. MacDonald. 2003. Response of three runner-type peanut cultivars to flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 17:89-93.
29. Moseley, C. M. and E. S. Hagood, Jr. 1990. Reducing herbicide inputs when establishing no-till soybeans. Weed Technol. 4:14-19.
30. Murphree, T. A., Dotray, P. A., Keeling, J. W., Baughman, T. A., and Grichar, W. J. 2003. Response of five peanut varieties to diclosulam and flumioxazin in Texas peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:34.
31. Muyonga, C. M., M. S. DeFelice, and B. D. Sims. 1996. Weed control with reduced rates of four soil applied soybean herbicides. Weed Sci. 44:148-155.
32. [NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2007. National Agricultural Statistics Service U. S. Department of Agriculture 2006 Crop Production Summary. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/CropProdSu//2000s/ 2007/CropProdSu-01-12-2007.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2007.
33. Price, A. J., J. W. Wilcut, and C. W. Swann. 2002. Weed management with diclosulam in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 16:724-730.
34. Prostko, E. P. and J. P. Meade. 1993. Reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in conventional soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7:365-369.
35. Richburg, J. S., III, J. W. Wilcut, A. K. Culbreath, and C. K. Kevien. 1995. Response of eight peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) cultivars to the herbicide AC 263,222. Peanut Sci. 22:76-80.
36. Richburg, J. S., III, J. W. Wilcut, and G. R. Wehtje. 1994. Toxicity of AC 263,222 to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 42:398-402.
37. Rosales-Robles, E., J. M. Chandler, S. A. Senseman, and E. P. Prostko. 1999. Influence of growth stage and herbicide rate on postemergence johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Technol. 13:525-529.
38. Scott, G. H., S. D. Askew, and J. W. Wilcut. 2001. Economic evaluation of diclosulam and flumioxazin systems in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:360-364.
39. Steckel, L. E., M. S. DeFelice, and B. D. Sims. 1990. Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:541-545.
40. Troxler, S. C., J. A. Tredaway, D. L. Jordan, B. J. Brecke, S. D. Askew, and J. W. Wilcut. 2001. Weed management in peanuts with reduced rates of diclosulam, flumioxazin, and imazapic. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:36.
41. Warren, L. S., Jr. and H. D. Coble. 1999. Managing purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) populations utilizing herbicide strategies and crop rotation sequences. Weed Technol. 13:494-503.
42. Webster, E. P. 2001. Economic losses due to weeds in southern states: cotton, soybean, peanut, tobacco, and forestry. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:261-263.
43. Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey (most common and most troublesome): broadleaf crops subsection: cotton, soybean, peanut, tobacco, and forestry. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:249-250.
44. Wilcut, J. W., S. D. Askew, W. A. Bailey, J. F. Spears, and T. G. Isleib. 2001. Virginia market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivar tolerance and yield response to flumioxazin preemergence. Weed Technol. 15:137-140.
45. Wilcut, J.W., J. S. Richburg, III, G.Wiley, and F. R.Walls, Jr. 1996. Postemergence AC 263,222 systems for weed control in peanut. Weed Sci. 44:104-110.
46. Wilcut, J. W., A. C. York, and G. R. Wehtje. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:177-205.
47. Zhang, J., S. E. Weaver, and A. S. Hamill. 2000. Risks and reliability of using herbicides at below-labeled rates. Weed Technol. 14:106-115.