Residual herbicide weed control systems in peanut

Weed Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 560-567

  Grey, Timothy L ^c   Wehtje, Glenn R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Peanut injury; Peanut yield; Susceptibility to herbicides

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CONTROL; HERBICIDE; INJURY; NUT; WEED; WEED CONTROL;

ALABAMA; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; GEORGIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ACANTHOSPERMUM HISPIDUM; AMARANTHUS CAUDATUS; AMARANTHUS PALMERI; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; CYPERUS ESCULENTUS; EUPHORBIA PULCHERRIMA;

EID: 33748052040     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-247.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Askew, S. D., J. W. Wilcut, and J. R. Cranmer. 1999. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with flumioxazin preemergence. Weed Technol. 13:594-598.
2. Bailey, W. A., J. W. Wilcut, D. L. Jordan, C. W. Swann, and V. B. Langston. 1999a. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with diclosulam preemergence. Weed Technol. 13:450-456.
3. Bailey, W. A., J. W. Wilcut, D. L. Jordan, C. W. Swann, and V. B. Langston. 1999b. Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and selected weeds to diclosulam. Weed Technol. 13:771-776.
4. Bailey, W. A., J. W. Wilcut, J. F. Spears, T. G. Isleib, and V. B. Langston. 2000. Diclosulam does not influence yields in eight market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Weed Technol. 14:402-405.
5. Brecke, B., G. Wehtje, and K. Paudel. 2002. Comparison between diclosulam- and imazapic-based weed control systems in peanut. Peanut Sci. 29:52-57.
6. Brown, S. M. 1994. Peanut herbicides for Georgia: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia, College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences Bull. 1100. Athens, GA: Cooperative Extension Service.
7. Buchanan, G. A., D. S. Murray, and E. W. Hauser. 1982. Weeds and their control in peanuts. In H. E. Pattee and C. T. Young, eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 206-249.
8. Cardina, J. and B. J. Brecke. 1991. Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) growth and development in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 5:147-153.
9. Dotray, P. A., T. A. Baughman, T. A. Keeling, W. J. Gricahr, and R. G. Lemon. 2001. Effect of imazapic application timing on Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:26-29.
10. Dotray, P. A. and J. W. Keeling. 1997. Purple nutsedge control in peanut as affected by imazameth (AC 263,222) and imazethapyr application timing. Peanut Sci. 24:113-116.
11. Grey, T. L. and D. C. Bridges. 2000. Effect of emergence and herbicide application timing on Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) competition in peanut (Arachis hypogea). In Proceedings of American Peanut Research and Education Society 32:23.
12. Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, and B. J. Brecke. 2000. Response of seven peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 14:51-56.
13. Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, and E. F. Eastin. 2001. Influence of application rate and timing of diclosulam on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 28:13-19.
14. Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, E. F. Eastin, and G. E. MacDonald. 2002. Influence of flumioxazin rate and herbicide combinations on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 29:24-29.
15. Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, H. G. Hancock, and J. W. Davis. 2004. Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) weed control. Weed Technol. 18:619-625.
16. Grey, T. L., G. R. Wehtje, R. H. Walker, and K. P. Paudel. 1995. Comparison of imazethapyr and paraquat-based weed control systems for peanut. Weed Technol. 9:813-818.
17. Grichar, W. J. 1997. Influence of herbicides and timing of application on broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 11: 708-713.
18. Grichar, W. J. and A. E. Colburn. 1996. Flumioxazin for weed control in Texas peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 23:30-36.
19. Grichar, W. J. and P. R. Nester. 1997. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222 and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 11:714-719.
20. Grichar, W. J. and D. C. Sestak. 2000. Herbicide systems for golden crown-beard (Verbesina encelioides) control in peanut. Peanut Sci. 27:23-26.
21. Hancock, H. G. 1992. Weed spectrum of F6285 in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:49.
22. Hauser, E. W., G. A. Buchanan, and W. J. Ethredge. 1975. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts. I. Effects of periods of weed-free maintenance or weed competition. Weed Sci. 23:368-372.
23. Johnson, W. C. III and B. G. Mullinix, Jr. 1994. Use of F6285 for weed control in peanut: efficacy and crop injury. Peanut Sci. 21:65-68.
24. Jordan, D. L. 1999. Influence of adjuvants on efficacy of imazapic and 2,4-DB. Peanut Sci. 26:1-4.
25. [NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2003. National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Published Estimates Database. Washington, DC: NASS-USDA.
26. Newsom, L. J., D. R. Shaw, and T. F. Hubbard, Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 263,222 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 41:523-527.
27. Richburg, J. S. III, J. W. Wilcut, A. K. Cullbreath, and C. K. Kvien. 1995a. Response of eight peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars to the herbicide AC 263,222. Peanut Sci. 22:76-80.
28. Richburg, J. S. III, J. W. Wilcut, and G. L. Wiley. 1995b. AC 263,222 and imazethapyr rates and mixtures for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 9:801-806.
29. Teem, D. H., C. S. Hoveland, and G. A. Buchanan. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee sena (Cassia occidentalis) geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:68-71.
30. Warren, G. F. and 50 cooperating crop specialists. 1998. Spectacular increases in crop yields in the United States in the twentieth century. Weed Technol. 12:752-760.
31. Webster, T. M., J. W. Wilcut, and H. D. Coble. 1997. Influence of AC 263,222 rate and application method on weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 11:520-526.
32. Wehtje, G. R., B. J. Brecke, and N. R. Martin, Jr. 2000a. Performance and economic benefit of herbicides for broadleaf weed control in peanut. Peanut Sci. 27:11-16.
33. Wehtje, G. R., J. A. McGuire, R. H. Walker, and M. G. Paterson. 1986. Texas panicum control in peanuts with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34:308-311.
34. Wehtje, G. R., D. Padgett, and N. R. Martin, Jr. 2000b. Imazapic-based herbicide systems for peanut and factors affecting activity on Florida beggarweed. Peanut Sci. 27:17-22.
35. Wilcut, J. W., S. D. Askew, W. A. Bailey, J. F. Spears, and T. G. Isleib. 2001. Virginia market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivar tolerance and yield response to flumioxazin preemergence. Weed Technol. 15:137-140.
36. Wilcut, J. W., J. S. Richburg III, and G. L. Wiley. 1996. Postemergence AC 263,222 systems for weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 44:615-621.
37. Wilcut, J. W., A. C. York, W. J. Grichar, and G. R. Wehtje. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). In H. E. Pattee and H. T. Stalker, eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 207-244.
38. [WSSA] Weed Science Society of America. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Champaign, IL: WSSA.