A Prospective Study of Symptom Distress and Return to Baseline Function After Open Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Urology

Volumn 182, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 956-966

  Dahl, Douglas M ^a   Barry, Michael J ^a   McGovern, Francis J ^a   Chang, Yuchaio ^a   Walker Corkery, Elizabeth ^a   McDougal, W Scott ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

laparoscopy; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHODIESTERASE V INHIBITOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CONTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; LYMPHOCELE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OPEN PROSTATECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENIS ERECTION; POSTAL MAIL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTICS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM DISTRESS SCALE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 68149159204     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.044     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Begg C.B., Riedel E.R., Bach P.B., et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 1138
2. Potosky A.L., Davis W.W., Hoffman R.M., et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 1358
3. Guillonneau B., Rozet F., Cathelineau X., et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167 (2002) 51
4. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 163 (2000) 418
5. Soulie M., Salomon L., Seguin P., et al. Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology 58 (2001) 899
6. Parsons J.K., and Bennett J.L. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 72 (2008) 412
7. Touijer K., Eastham J.A., Secin F.P., et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 179 (2008) 1811
8. McCorkle R., and Young K. Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nurs 1 (1978) 373
9. Katz J.N., Chang L.C., Sangha O., et al. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review?. Med Care 34 (1996) 73
10. Litwin M.S., Hays R.D., Fink A., et al. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care 36 (1998) 1002
11. Potosky A.L., Harlan L.C., Stanford J.L., et al. Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 91 (1999) 1719
12. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473
13. Ware J., Snow K., Kosinski M., et al. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Medical Outcomes Trust (1993), Nimrod Press, Boston
14. Elliott S.P., Meng M.V., Elkin E.P., et al. Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data from CaPSURE. J Urol 178 (2007) 529
15. Lepor H., Nieder A.M., and Ferrandino M.N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol 166 (2001) 1729
16. Romero-Otero J., Touijer K., and Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: contemporary comparison with open surgery. Urol Oncol 25 (2007) 499
17. Rozet F., Jaffe J., Guillaume B., et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 178 (2007) 478
18. Dahl D.M., He W., Lazarus R., et al. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. Urology 68 (2006) 1253
19. Burnett A.L., Aus G., Canby-Hagino E.D., et al. Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment. J Urol 178 (2007) 597
20. Tseng T.Y., Kuebler H.R., Cancel Q.V., et al. Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology 68 (2006) 1061