Training teachers and serving students: Applying usability testing in writing programs

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 323-346

  McGovern, Heather ^a  

^a RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149125587     PISSN: 00472816     EISSN: 15413780     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/TW.37.3.f     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. S. Murphy, A Sociocultural Perspective on Teacher Response: Is There a Student in the Room? Assessing Writing, 7, pp. 79-90, 2000.
2. J. Dubinsky, More than a Knack: Techne and Teaching Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 11:2, pp. 129-145, 2002.
3. V. Nees-Hatlen, Collaborating on Writing Assignments: A Workshop with Theoretical Implications, Journal of Teaching Writing, 4:2, pp. 234-247, 1985.
4. J. W. May, A Comparison of Faculty and Student Course Evaluations in a Clinical Teaching Program, College Student Teaching Journal, 24, pp. 399-403, 1990.
5. S. Barr-Ebest, The Next Generation of WPAs: A Study of Graduate Students in Composition Rhetoric, Writing Program Administration, 22, pp. 65-84, 1999.
6. B. Selting, Conversations with Technical Writing Teachers: Defining a Problem, Technical Communication Quarterly, 11:3, pp. 251-266, 2002.
7. S. Rose and M. Finders, Learning from Experience: Using Situated Performances in Writing Teacher Development, Writing Program Administration, 22, pp. 32-52, 1998.
8. R. Iannone, Chaos Theory and Its Implications for Curriculum and Teaching, Education, 5:4, pp. 541-547, 1995.
9. S. Schneider, Usable Pedagogies: Usability, Rhetoric, and Sociocultural Pedagogy in the Technical Writing Classroom, Technical Communication Quarterly, 14:4, pp. 447-468, 2005.
10. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, 1993.
11. J. Dumas and J. Redish, A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, 1994.
12. L. Kastman Breuch, M. Zachry, and C. Spinuzzi, Usability Instruction in Technical Communication Programs: New Directions in Curriculum Development, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, pp. 223-240, 2001.
13. R. Molich, M. Ede, K. Kaasgaard, and B. Karyukin, Comparative Usability Evaluation, Behaviour and Information Technology, 23:1, pp.65-75, 2004.
14. T. M. Skelton, Testing the Usability of Usability Testing, Technical Communication, 39, pp. 343-359, 1992.
15. M. Salvo, Ethics of Engagement: User-Centered Design and Rhetorical Methodology, Technical Communication Quarterly, 10:3, pp. 273-290, 2001.
16. J. Phelps and R. Reynolds, Formative Evaluation of a Web-Based Course in Meteorology, Computers and Education, 32, pp. 181-193, 1999.
17. M. Hawkes and D. Coldeway, An Analysis of Team vs. Faculty-Based Online Course Development: Implications for Instructional Design, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3:4, pp. 431-441, 2002.
18. M. Crowther, C. Keller, and G. Waddoups, Improving the Quality and Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Instruction through Usability Evaluations, British Journal of Educational Technology, 35:3, pp. 289-304, 2004.
19. G. Brooks and S. Kahn, Evaluation of a Course in Gender and Cultural Issues, Counselor Education and Supervision, 30, pp. 67-76, 1990.
20. C. Boiarsky, Using Usability Testing to Teach Reader Response, Technical Communication, 39, pp. 100-102, 1992.
21. R. Grice and L. Ridgway, A Discussion of Modes and Motives for Usability Evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32:4, pp. 230-237, 1989.
22. R. Guillemette, Usability in Computer Documentation Design: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32:4, pp. 217-229, 1989.
23. P. Sullivan, Beyond a Narrow Conception of Usability Testing, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32:4, pp. 256-264, 1989.
24. K. Shriver, Dynamics in Document Design, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997.
25. S. Rosenbaum, Usability Evaluations Versus Usability Testing: When and Why? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32:4, pp. 210-216, 1989.
26. C. Spinuzzi, Grappling with Distributed Usability: A Cultural-Historical Examination of Documentation Genres Over Four Decades, Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, New Orleans, Louisiana, 12-14 September, 1999, Association for Computing Machinery Press, New York, 1999.
27. M. Hughes, Rigor in Usability Testing, Technical Communication, 46, pp. 488-494, 1989.
28. J. M. Clegg, What if You Cannot Test All Documents for Usability? Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, pp. 43-56, 1995.
29. J. Rubin, Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests, John Wiley, New York, 1994.
30. McGovern, H., Not Just Usability Testing: Remembering and Applying Non-Usability Testing Methods for Learning How Our Web Sites Function, Technical Communication, 52:2, pp. 175-186, 2005.
31. McGovern, H., Drafting a Teaching Philosophy Statement: Handling a Juggling Act, Lore: An E-Journal for Teachers of Writing, Fall 2004.
32. Sehmel, H., How a Small Environmental Group Uses the Web to Inform and Promote Action: A Content Analysis, in Environmental Online Communication, A. Scharl (ed.), Springer-Verlag London Ltd., London, pp. 45-52, 2004.
33. Sehmel, H., Websites and Advocacy Campaigns: Decision Making, Implementation, ?nd Audience in an Environmental Advocacy Group's Use of Websites as Part of its Communication Campaigns, Business Communication Quarterly, 65:2, pp. 100-106, 2002.