Using virtual reality to assess young adult smokers' attention to cues

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 373-378

  Traylor, Amy C ^b,c   Bordnick, Patrick S ^b   Carter, Brian L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MALE; ODOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; SMOKING; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PILOT PROJECTS; REFERENCE VALUES; SMOKING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68149124046     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0070     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Centers for Disease Control. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses-United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report CDC Surveillance Summary 2005; 54:625-8.
2. Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration. (2002) Results from the national household survey on drug abuse: vol. I. Summary of national findings. DHHS publication no. SMA 02-3758. Rockville, MD: Author.
3. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 2000; 55:469-80.
4. Arnett JJ. The myth of peer influence in adolescent smoking initiation. Health Education & Behavior 2007; 34:594-607.
5. Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 1999; 94:327-40.
6. Carter BL, Tiffany ST. The cue-availability paradigm: the effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology 2001; 9:183-90.
7. Waters AJ, Feyerabend C. Determinants and effects of attentional bias in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2000; 14:111-20.
8. Mogg K, Bradley BP, Field M, et al. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction 2003; 98:825-36.
9. Bradley BP, Mogg K, Wright T, et al. Attentional bias in drug dependence: vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2003; 17:66-72.
10. Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, et al. Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 2002; 67:185-91.
11. Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Sayette MA, et al. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychology 2003; 22:378-87.
12. Barkley RA. The ecological validity of laboratory and analogue assessment methods of ADHD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1991; 19:149-78.
13. Mogg K, Field M, Bradley BP. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology 2005; 180:333-41.
14. Herz RS. A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory, visual, and auditory stimuli. Chemical Senses 2004; 29:217-24.
15. Chu S, Downes JJ. Proust nose best: odors are better cues of autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition 2002; 30:511-8.
16. Bordnick PS, Graap KM, Brooks J, et al. (2004) Virtual reality-nicotine cue reactivity assessment system (VR- NCRAS). (Version 1.0) [PC]. Decatur, GA: Virtual Better, Inc.
17. Bordnick PS, Graap KM, Copp HL, et al. Virtual reality cue reactivity assessment in cigarette smokers. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2005; 8:487-92.
18. Bordnick PS, Graap KM, Copp HL, et al. Utilizing virtual reality to standardize nicotine craving research: a pilot study. Addictive Behaviors 2004; 29:1889-94.
19. Traylor AC, Bordnick PS, Carter BL. Assessing craving in young adult smokers using virtual reality. American Journal on Addictions 2008; 17:436-40.
20. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al. The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction 1991; 86:1119-27.
21. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ. The development and initial validation of a questionnaire of smoking urges. British Journal of Addiction 1991; 86:1467-76.
22. Martin GN, Apnea F, Chaudry Z, et al. The development of an attitude towards the sense of smell questionnaire (SoSQ) and a comparison of different professions' responses. North American Journal of Psychology 2001; 3:491-502.
23. Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 1999; 94:327-40.