Student Perceptions of Hybrid Courses: Measuring and Interpreting Quality

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-12

  Jackson, Mary Jo ^a   Helms, Marilyn M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b DALTON STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

distance learning; higher education; hybrid; student perceptions; SWOT analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149106391     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.84.1.7-12     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu, 14, 39-48.
2. Kay, J. (1995). Foundations of corporate success: How business strategy adds value. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Almala, A. H. (2005). A constructivist conceptual framework for a quality e-learning environment. Distance Learning, 2(5), 9-12.
4. Banta, T. W. (2004). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. Review of Higher Education, 27, 577.
5. Beard, L. A., & Harper, C. (2002). Student perceptions of online versus on campus instruction. Education, 122, 658-663.
6. Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
7. Bullington, K. E. (2005, February). Supply environment analysis from a six sigma perspective. Inside Supply Management, 16, 10-14.
8. Carlson, S. (2004, November 26). Online education survey finds unexpectedly high enrollment growth. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, p. 30.
9. Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2006). Desperate technologists: Critical issues in e-learning and implications for higher education. Journal of Thought, 41(1), 95-119.
10. Glaister, K. W., & Falshaw, J. R. (1999). Strategic planning still going strong. Long Range Planning, 32(1), 107-116.
11. Guidera, S. G. (2004). Perception of the effectiveness of online instruction in terms of the seven principles of effective undergraduate education. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2/3), 139.
12. Hamzaee, R. G. (2005). A survey and a theoretical model of distance education programs. International Advances in Economic Research, 11, 215-229.
13. Hatfield, M. (2006, November 26). Off campus online: Distance learning becoming more popular among students who work, have families. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, p. 1.
14. Husmann, D. E., & Miller, M. T. (2001). Improving distance education: Perceptions of program administrators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(3). Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring41/husmann41.html http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring41/husmann41.html
15. The future of leaning: From e-learning to m-learning. Keegan, D. (2002). Hagen, Germany: Fern Universitat Institute for Research into Distance Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472435)
16. Klesius, J. P., Homan, S., and Thompson, T. (1997). Distance education compared to traditional education: The students' view. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24, 207-222.
17. Lai, C. A., & Rivera, J. C., Jr., (2006) Using a strategic planning tool as a framework for case analysis. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(2), 26-30.
18. Mackay, S. T., & Stockport, G. J. (2006). Blended learning: Classroom and e-learning. Business Review, 5(1), 82-88.
19. Miller, M. T., & Husmann, D. E. (1996). A holistic model for primary factors in the ecology of distance education course offerings. Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 101-110.
20. Noble, D. F. (2003). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.
21. Ortiz-Rodriguez, M., Telg, R. W., Irani, T., Roberts, T. G., & Rhoades, E. (2005). College students' perceptions of quality in distance education: The importance of communication. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 97-109.
22. U.S. News and World Report Pethokoukis, J. M. (2002, June 24). E-learn and earn: As dot coms mostly fade, online universities are proving that there's gold in them thar screens., 132(22), p. 36.
23. Plotrowski, C., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2000). Are the reported barriers to Internet-based instruction warranted? A synthesis of recent research. Education, 121, 48-53.
24. Ponzurick, T., France, K., & Logar, C (2000). Delivering graduate marketing education: An analysis of face-to-face versus distance education. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 180-187.
25. Porter, M. E. (1990). New global strategies for competitive advantage. Planning Review, 18(3), 4-14.
26. Ramsden, P., & Dodds, A. (1989). Improving teaching and courses: A guide to evaluation. Victoria, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
27. Quarterly Review of Distance Education Simonson, M. (2005). Entering the mainstream: Distance education and higher education., 6(1), VII.
28. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-115.
29. Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (2001). Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education. Communication Education, 50(3), 230-241.
30. Chamberlin, W. S. (2001). Face to face vs. cyberspace: Finding the middle ground. Syllabus, 15, 11.
31. Drago, W., Peltier, J. W., Hay, W., & Hodgkinson, M. (2005). Dispelling the myths of online education: Learning via the information superhighway. Management Research News, 28(7), 1-17.