The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan

Economics of Education Review

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 571-584

  Ni, Yongmei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Charter schools; Competitive effect; School efficiency

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); PRIMARY EDUCATION; PUBLIC SECTOR; SECONDARY EDUCATION;

MICHIGAN; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 68049139390     PISSN: 02727757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Addonizio M., Mills E., and Kearney C. Public school finance programs of the United States and Canada: 1998-99 (2000), NCES, Washington, DC
2. Arsen D., and Ni Y. The competitive effect of school choice policies on performance in traditional public schools (No. EPSL-0803-261-EPRU) (2008), Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University & Education and the Public Interest Center, University of Colorado, Tempe, AZ/Boulder, CO
3. Arsen D., and Plank D. Michigan school finance under Proposal A: State control local consequences (2003), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
4. Arsen D., Plank D., and Sykes G. School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter (1999), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
5. Bettinger E. The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review 24 2 (2005) 133-147
6. Bifulco R., and Ladd H.F. The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy 1 1 (2006) 50-89
7. Bohte J. Examining the impact of charter schools on performance in traditional public schools. The Policy Studies Journal 32 4 (2004) 501-520
8. Booker K., Gilpatric S., Gronberg T., and Jansen D. The effect of charter schools on traditional public schools (2005), National Center for the Study for the Privatization in Education, Teacher College, Columbia University, Washington, DC
9. Buddin R., and Zimmer R. Is charter school competition in California improving the performance of traditional public schools? (No. WR-297-EDU) (2005), RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
10. Carr M., and Ritter G. Measuring the competitive effect of charter schools on student achievement in Ohio's traditional public schools (No. 146) (2007), National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Columbia University, New York
11. Chubb J., and Moe T. Politics, markets and America's schools (1990), The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
12. Fiske E., and Ladd H. When schools compete: A cautionary tale (2000), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
13. Glomm G., Harris D., and Lo T.-F. Charter school location. Economics of Education Review 24 4 (2005) 451-457
14. Goldhaber D., Guin D., Henig J.R., Hess F.M., and Weiss J.A. How school choice affects students who do not choose. In: Betts J.R., and Loveless T. (Eds). Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (2005), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
15. Holmes G., DeSimone J., and Rupp N. Does school choice increase school quality? (No. W9683) (2003)
16. Hoxby C. School choice and school competition: Evidence from the United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review 10 (2003) 11-67
17. Hoxby C. School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats?. In: Hoxby C.M. (Ed). The economics of school choice (2003), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
18. Sass T. Charter schools and student achievement in Florida. Education Finance and Policy 1 1 (2006) 91-122
19. Wooldridge J. Introductory Econometrics: A modern approach (2000), South-Western College, Cincinnati, OH
20. Wooldridge J. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA